LinkBack URL
About LinkBacksRead more.Three bits-per-cell on a 34 nm process equals more flash storage in smaller devices.
Read more.Three bits-per-cell on a 34 nm process equals more flash storage in smaller devices.
Making things smaller has gotten to the point where its just stupid how easy it is going to be to loose that.
Until it gets so small that no one will ever be able to find what you lostOriginally Posted by Breezey
Main PC: Asus Rampage IV Extreme / 3960X@4.5GHz / Antec H1200 Pro / 32GB DDR3-1866 Quad Channel / Sapphire Fury X / Areca 1680 / 850W EVGA SuperNOVA Gold 2 / Corsair 600T / 2x Dell 3007 / 4 x 250GB SSD + 2 x 80GB SSD / 4 x 1TB HDD (RAID 10) / Windows 10 Pro, Yosemite & Ubuntu
HTPC: AsRock Z77 Pro 4 / 3770K@4.2GHz / 24GB / GTX 1080 / SST-LC20 / Antec TP-550 / Hisense 65k5510 4K TV / HTC Vive / 2 x 240GB SSD + 12TB HDD Space / Race Seat / Logitech G29 / Win 10 Pro
HTPC2: Asus AM1I-A / 5150 / 4GB / Corsair Force 3 240GB / Silverstone SST-ML05B + ST30SF / Samsung UE60H6200 TV / Windows 10 Pro
Spare/Loaner: Gigabyte EX58-UD5 / i950 / 12GB / HD7870 / Corsair 300R / Silverpower 700W modular
NAS 1: HP N40L / 12GB ECC RAM / 2 x 3TB Arrays || NAS 2: Dell PowerEdge T110 II / 24GB ECC RAM / 2 x 3TB Hybrid arrays || Network:Buffalo WZR-1166DHP w/DD-WRT + HP ProCurve 1800-24G
Laptop: Dell Precision 5510 Printer: HP CP1515n || Phone: Huawei P30 || Other: Samsung Galaxy Tab 4 Pro 10.1 CM14 / Playstation 4 + G29 + 2TB Hybrid drive
they won't get any smaller, but the capacieties of already small drives and memory cards will go up. And hopefully costs will go down as well.
If these chips are also fast, I'm looking forward to cheaper SanDisk Extreme IV or even V CompactFlash and SD cards.
Also a 32GB microSD would be good.
Mate that (or my current 16GB microSD) with this and you are all set!
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote