Results 1 to 3 of 3

Thread: Analysis - Qualcomm?s European mobile TV challenge

  1. #1
    HEXUS.admin
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    31,709
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    2,073 times in 719 posts

    Analysis - Qualcomm?s European mobile TV challenge

    FLO TV has taken-off in the US, but in this exclusive interview Qualcomm reveals it?s another matter entirely to bring it over here.
    Read more.

  2. #2
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    Norfolk
    Posts
    13
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    0 times in 0 posts

    Re: Analysis - Qualcomm?s European mobile TV challenge

    I'd far prefer content on demand, especially with the interruptions that come with mobile viewing.

  3. #3
    Does he need a reason? Funkstar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Aberdeen
    Posts
    19,874
    Thanks
    629
    Thanked
    962 times in 813 posts
    • Funkstar's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Gigabyte EG45M-DS2H
      • CPU:
      • Intel Core2Quad Q9550 (2.83GHz)
      • Memory:
      • 8GB OCZ PC2-6400C5 800MHz Quad Channel
      • Storage:
      • 650GB Western Digital Caviar Blue
      • Graphics card(s):
      • 512MB ATI Radeon HD4550
      • PSU:
      • Antec 350W 80+ Efficient PSU
      • Case:
      • Antec NSK1480 Slim Mini Desktop Case
      • Operating System:
      • Vista Ultimate 64bit
      • Monitor(s):
      • Dell 2407 + 2408 monitors
      • Internet:
      • Zen 8mb

    Re: Analysis - Qualcomm?s European mobile TV challenge

    Quote Originally Posted by Chem Assayag
    "Traditional DVB-T technology is not designed for mobility as it ideally requires a roof-top antenna, so you need a special technology"
    And FLO TV doesn't require "special technology"? That sounds exactly what FLO TV is to me. Special technology heavily licensed and controlled by Qualcomm.

    So FLO TV isn't part of the mobile network, and it isn't the same as DVB-T, so what broadcast technology and frequency does it use then?

    If it's in an unregulated band, it's going to need new equipment to broadcast it.
    If it's in the TV band it's going to need regulatory approval.
    If it's in the Radio band it's going to need regulatory approval.
    If it's in the mobile band but separate from the mobile network it's going to need new equipment.

    What about DVB-H, how does it compare?

    Seems to be very little substance to that press release, in my opinion.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 19
    Last Post: 06-10-2009, 05:09 PM
  2. Replies: 0
    Last Post: 12-06-2009, 11:27 AM
  3. Analysis - BT mobile broadband lacks breadth
    By HEXUS in forum HEXUS News
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 09-05-2008, 10:25 AM
  4. Replies: 0
    Last Post: 14-09-2005, 05:48 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •