Read more.We take a look at the newest member of the Radeon 5-series family and then strap a second one in for good measure.
Read more.We take a look at the newest member of the Radeon 5-series family and then strap a second one in for good measure.
It's worse than that - a 512MB XFX 5750 (albeit not in stock) has a scan list price of £87 - cheaper than the 5670.The better-performing Radeon HD 5750 costs just a little more
It's a real shame that the price isn't significantly lower. These cards *should* be £50 - £70, making them genuinely price-competitive against the 4670 and the GT240 / 9600GT. With a starting price of £70 for a card that can't outperform a 9800GT *and* doesn't have Eyefinity or CrosfireX support, they're a huge waste of money, and if you move up the range to get those features you're solidly into 5750 territory. I just don't get it...
Most of the 9800GT 512MB cards available at around £70 are the Green Edition versions which have lower clockspeeds. It would have been useful if this review compared the 512MB version of the HD5670 to this.
There is a mistake? "and the HD 4670 can be purchased for around £50, making it much cheaper than the HD 4670" On system setup .
Also, how about testing this card without AA at 1200 res? My friend uses a 9600 and never uses AA.... This card seems to dislike AA so without it you may see it overtakes a bit more!.
The 1gb isnt worth it though imo.
Yes exactly, the expected launch price is very wrong.
Held off buying the 4670 as these should slot in as replacements at the same/lower price point but the 4670 has been held at an artificially high price for a long time too (compared to relative performance).
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)