Read more.Chip giant to introduce range-topping Clarkdale CPU and a new low-power Lynnfield.
Read more.Chip giant to introduce range-topping Clarkdale CPU and a new low-power Lynnfield.
So the i7 870s is going to be slower than the i7 860? That numbering scheme makes sense then.
I believe the idea is to have a lower base clock so the powersaving stuff can reduce speeds even lower when idle, but to have a similar peak speed via turbo-boost or whatever. Still seems a bit iffy to me, but I think that's intel's plan.
no more 32nm parts? i would have thought that the i5 would have used 32nm
oh right another "too expensive to be of any use" clarkdale (AMT KVM is alright but not worth it). I thought it was 45nm because of the GPU. Cheap 32nm is what's needed here (lynnfield type preferably) but that 45nm fab capacity has to be put to use somewhere i guess
The CPU *is* 32nm. The on-die northbr... sorry, GPU is 45nm.
I assume the new i7 is still on 45nm, as I'm pretty sure they could run a 32nm quad @ a higher clock speed than that while keeping the tdp down? As I understand it retaping from 45nm to 32nm isn't entirely straight forward, so while they've got 45nm capacity to use there's no good reason to transfer to 32nm wholesale - they'll move across a bit at a time.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)