Read more.High-end successors to 5870 and 5850 to land in late November?
Read more.High-end successors to 5870 and 5850 to land in late November?
Slide is a fail.. AMD would not be stupid enough to get the units wrong on memory speed. 6Gbps is several orders of magnitude out.
I thought the 6970 was the new 5970? Wasnt the 5970 sort of a 5870x2?
Surely 1GB of memory is a bit low for a dual card?
Currently studying: Electronic Engineering and Artificial Intelligence at the University of Southampton.
it's set to be a single GPU card supposedly.
I really have no faith at all in these slides, why would AMD spend the whole time having meetings with dubiously trustworthy workers instead of doing any actual work?
"I want to be young and wild, then I want to be middle aged and rich, then I want to be old and annoy people by pretending that I'm deaf..."
my Hexus.Trust
ah yes, i did read about the 5870 becoming the 6970 - noob comment, sorry
so does that mean the 6970 x2 will be the 6990?
Currently studying: Electronic Engineering and Artificial Intelligence at the University of Southampton.
heres another of the slides:
http://www.techpowerup.com/img/10-10-14/71f.jpg
so whats a GTX450 again
calliing fake
and if you look the badwidth is mentioned as Gpbs - thats Giga Bits Per Second , ......
erm... current memory speed on a 5870 is 4.8Gbps (x 256/8 bytes = whatever the ridiculous bandwidth is actually available!).
I believe they started using Gbps instead of MHz with the 5 series due to the differences between clock speed, transfers and bitrate for GDDR5 memory. Basically it'll be GDDR5 clocked at 1500MHz. Nothing wrong with the slide there...
Given that both of these slides come from an August OEM briefing, prior to either the dropping of the ATI brand or the release of the GTS450; and given that they contain very little in the way hard facts (remember the < 300W TDP on the GTX480 that turned out to be 250W? And quelle surprise! that AMD are targeting the new card ranges to perform just above the nvidia equivalents!) I hardly think they'd be worth faking. In fact, in news terms this whole thing is a bit of a non-event.
The only question is whether the Juniper core will get a touch up or whether they'll just directly rename the 5750 / 5770 to 6750 / 6770.
Last edited by scaryjim; 14-10-2010 at 03:23 PM. Reason: heavy editing after reading the slides properly ;)
You sure? So you can reach the speed of ultra fast DDR5 VRAM with a few SSDs in RAID?
SATA 2 is 3Gbps.
I thought the 5870 mem speed was 153.6GBps, so about 1500Gbps.
edıt: or I could actually read.. sorry. okay, makes sense consıderıng the x256 /bytes thing. Speed, not bandwidth. So hard to compare until we know the bus width.
Last edited by kalniel; 14-10-2010 at 03:34 PM.
No worries, does my head in most days (I'm just particularly lucid this week apparently ). Bus width is 256bit apparently, so these cards are going to be heavy on bandwidth and pixel fill rate, but a little light on shading power. Should make for interesting benchmarks when we get some official ones
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)