Read more.1.6 million cores and 1.6 petabytes of memory help the Sequoia chug along.
Read more.1.6 million cores and 1.6 petabytes of memory help the Sequoia chug along.
There must be a typo because 372/500 is not 47.5% :S ("However 372 of the top 500 supercomputers do use Intel processors (47.5 per cent)")
So, if we scaled that up linearly to an exaflop, we'd be using 484MW of power.
Or, to put it another way, it'd cost nearly $500M a year to run.
So you can see why the HPC community has a target of exaflop in 20MW.
Platinum (18-06-2012)
"Compared to the leading machine on the first supercomputer chart compiled in 1993 (the Thinking Machines CM-5/1024) the Sequoia is an incredible 273,930 times faster."
So much for Moore's Law...
Do those Power chips share any kinship with the PowerPc of old? I still remember the amusing advertising of 'Performance Optimisation With Enhanced RISC' starring Hagar the Horrible (in Byte magazine IIRC) *sigh*
Wonder why they couldn't compete in the consumer/business market (eg with Apple, before they forsook them for Intel)? Or was it all Motorola's fault...?
------------------
Valar Morghulis
Pleiades (18-06-2012)
Yes, they're direct descendants of those and cousins/brothers of the Power7 chips in IBM's current product lines. If you're bored check out https://www.power.org/events/PowerWe..._Dr._Luigi.pdf
And I wouldn't say that they couldn't compete in the consumer market, remember the Cell processor in the PS3 has a Power processor core, and the "Broadway" process that drives the Wii is a Power processor. Oh and IBM does very nicely in the business market with Power-based systems, plus the processors are widely used in embedded applications, like printers.
Nah, because the Sequoia runs ... Linux
Pleiades (18-06-2012)
...Meh. (acting cool but actually screaming in my head)
Can't wait until one of these PCs draws 1.21 Gigawatts...
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)