Read more.Apple's 13-inch MacBook Air with 256GB SSD also gets £50 sliced from the price.
Read more.Apple's 13-inch MacBook Air with 256GB SSD also gets £50 sliced from the price.
Oh how wonderous. I will now save 50 pounds on the 700 quid I am paying for nothing other than "cos it's apple".
Current specs:
CPU: Intel i5 3570k Overclocked @ 4.6Ghz GPU: MSI Twin Frozr 7850 @ 1000Mhz Cooler: Arctic Cooling Freezer 13 RAM: 16Gb Corsair Vengeance 1600Mhz
Motherboard: Gigabyte GA Z77X-D3H
Didn't realise there was a difference between 2.4GHz and 2.4GHz...The base model at £1,799 now features a 2.4GHz quad-core Intel Core i7 chip (up from 2.4GHz)...
----------------------------------------------
No I won't be buying an Apple laptop.
That's pretty good, the 13" now comes in £500 (25%) cheaper than the Sony VAIO equivalent.
It doesn't have the Blu-Ray writer the Sony has, but the Sony has a 1600x900 display Vs the 2560x1600 Retina
System:Atari 2600 CPU:8-bit 6507 (1.19MHz) RAM:128 bytes Colours: 16 (4 on screen) Resolution: 192x160Originally Posted by The Mock Turtle
This is just the beginning of the price cuts. The macbook range has been behind the competition in terms of screen resolution for years, until now of course. Apple's fixation with simply doubling resolutions means the only way they'll catch up is to push all their macbooks to "retina", not that it's a secret or anything. They know this needs to be done fairly quickly and there's no way they could get away with pushing all the MBP prices up so by next year I'd bet that even the entry models will be retina for the same price. As much as Apple likes to charge extortionate prices, their design choices and the need to keep up with the competition should result in more reasonable prices in the future.
I like to think that Cook has his head screwed on a bit better but maybe they'll always continue as the Jobs cult
Those who live by the sword get shot by those who don't
dont know about these macbooks - utilsing only HD400 graphics on a very high resolution display. what is apple thinking
my bad macbooks do have gpus just a mid range one though
This is still a complete rip off though isn't it. I mean really, £1000 and all you are doing is paying for screen real estate. I would go to say that the majority of people buying these, and I have no problem with those Apple users that do use them for photography and editing purposes, would not know the difference between these and a high end ultrabook. The only difference being that this has a lovely piece of fruit on the front and is running MAC OSX which is a quadrillion times faster than Windows (i don't believe this, what fanboys will tell you).
At the end of the day I can run applications as fast on my Toshiba Satelite R710 with an SSD. People need to see past the brushed aluminum and fashion appeal and start to see how much they are paying. Short sightedness costs a fortune, no wonder they are the only company making huge profits from hardware. The majority have no idea what they are buying.
So, if you compare a price of a pimped-up 'old' macbook 15" with the retina version the newer one actually comes cheaper! That's kind of stupid...
God Bless Apple
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)