Results 1 to 5 of 5

Thread: Reviews - WD Sentinel DX4000

  1. #1
    HEXUS.admin
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    31,709
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    2,073 times in 719 posts

    Reviews - WD Sentinel DX4000

    Up to 16TB of centralised storage for your small -business needs.
    Read more.

  2. #2
    Chaos Monkey Apex's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Huddersfield
    Posts
    4,706
    Thanks
    1,139
    Thanked
    284 times in 203 posts
    • Apex's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Asus Z87M-PLUS
      • CPU:
      • Intel i5-4670K
      • Memory:
      • 32 GiB
      • Storage:
      • 20 TiB
      • Graphics card(s):
      • PowerColor Radeon RX 6700 Fighter 10GB OC
      • PSU:
      • 750
      • Case:
      • Core View 21
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 10 pro
      • Monitor(s):
      • Dell S2721DGFA
      • Internet:
      • 200Mb nTL Cable

    Re: Reviews - WD Sentinel DX4000

    The rebuild / build times on this is somewhat a worrying issue (price seems decent but the lack or certain features makes this a no go)

  3. #3
    Jay
    Jay is offline
    Gentlemen.. we're history Jay's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Jita
    Posts
    8,365
    Thanks
    304
    Thanked
    568 times in 409 posts

    Re: Reviews - WD Sentinel DX4000

    RAID 5 and 16TB is probably a really really bad idea, the chance of data loss is quite high.
    □ΞVΞ□

  4. #4
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    1,894
    Thanks
    92
    Thanked
    84 times in 64 posts
    • miniyazz's system
      • CPU:
      • Acer Aspire 8920G
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 7 Pro
      • Monitor(s):
      • Optoma HD700X projector @ c. 90"
      • Internet:
      • Really, really ****

    Re: Reviews - WD Sentinel DX4000

    Quote Originally Posted by Jay View Post
    RAID 5 and 16TB is probably a really really bad idea, the chance of data loss is quite high.
    Yeah, raid 6 or 51 should be a minimum at this level.

  5. #5
    Registered+
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Posts
    15
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    1 time in 1 post

    Re: Reviews - WD Sentinel DX4000

    Quote Originally Posted by miniyazz View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Jay View Post
    RAID 5 and 16TB is probably a really really bad idea, the chance of data loss is quite high.
    Yeah, raid 6 or 51 should be a minimum at this level.
    Definitely - It would be madness to use RAID0 for 16TB, even if it was just a temporary video framestore - I feel the review should have made this much clearer, especially as the benchmarks were testing RAID5. Unfortunately with the limited number of bays it makes level 6 or 51 somewhat pointless/unfeasible.

    Rebuild time is not surprising and inevitable given the amount of data that has to transferred across the bus, especially in this case with a consumer-level SAS/SATA backplane and controller. I have an 8 x 4TB array at home and about 6 days is what it took to build.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •