Read more.This Fibre to the Premises (FTTP) service will cost £50 per month.
Read more.This Fibre to the Premises (FTTP) service will cost £50 per month.
Maybe they should focus on actually upgrading all the cabinets and exchanges so the areas like mine that were supposed to be upgraded to fibre 'around June 2012' and still haven't, instead of new package after new package.
Yep, me and 25% of the rest of the population will still be on < 3 MB/s while the "national average" skyrockets.
I wrote to my MP on exactly that point. Waiting for a reply....
Society's to blame,
Or possibly Atari.
My ISP is guilty of that BS. Promised us broadband (not even fiber, just plain old coaxial broadband) by 2010. 2011 rolled up and they reneged, claiming the infrastructure was too expensive. So here I am in 2013, still stuck on ADSL, slower than 98% of the country, while they keep dreaming up faster and faster services and ignoring us out here. Yes, I'm bitter. But I own this house and I'm not moving.
Releasing this package doesn't necessarily need any/much extra infrastructure (depending on uptake); the GPON network already supports ~2Gbps downstream, 1Gbps upstream per node, so it's more a case of 'why not' than diverting funds from elsewhere.
Well it certainly wasn't helped by the insane subsidy of rural broadband.
Have a look at how FTTP exchanges have been chosen:
http://blog.networkunion.co/blog/bid...-map-and-costs
(scroll to the map).
Basically tax payers money, paid for fewer people to get a good service. Sure, people on these rural exchanges get a better service now, all 15 of them. Meanwhile in large city areas very large numbers of people get terrible highly congested speeds. Yey for subsidies!
throw new ArgumentException (String, String, Exception)
...traffic shaped down to 2.3Mbps and capped at 30GB per month.BT Infinity to launch 300Mbps "supercharged" broadband
probably
Not even as good as that. I live in a small town ~6k people, and are 'officially designated' as rural. We now have the luxury of ADSL2, but we are not even on the plans for any rollout of anything in the forseeable future.
Society's to blame,
Or possibly Atari.
With this FTTP will it still require a phone line though? Currently I have BT Infinity and its costing me about £40 a month due to line rental and internet.
Also, 300mbit down and only 20mbit up? Surely they could make it 300/100!
Anything that travels over antique copper phonelines ain't broadband.
Broadband is a speed definition not a technology. If you get ADSL at 100kbs is it still broadband ?
TBF there are no clear defitions - although clearly the government don't have a clue.
http://www.publications.parliament.u...ni/41/4106.htm
"First, it has to be said that in a field quite so riddled with jargon and industry branding as broadband, it has been singularly unhelpful for the Government to use a term as vague as 'superfast,' and in so doing, to give it quite such a flexible meaning. By our count, they have used three varying definitions:
· In its early guidance to local authorities, the meaning was clear: "BDUK has defined superfast broadband as having a potential headline access speed of at least 20Mbps";[59]
· Later, in the glossary of its delivery model, "BDUK defines superfast broadband infrastructure as infrastructure capable of delivering speeds higher than 24Mbps, in line with the Ofcom definition";[60]
· More recently, in its guidance on state aid, this definition has shifted to "infrastructure capable of delivering superfast broadband speeds (meaning speeds of 30 Mbps or in any event more than 24 Mbps)";[61]
· Furthermore, the BT Infinity product used to deliver 'superfast' in Cornwall only guarantees a minimum of 15Mbps. "
Society's to blame,
Or possibly Atari.
Main PC: Asus Rampage IV Extreme / 3960X@4.5GHz / Antec H1200 Pro / 32GB DDR3-1866 Quad Channel / Sapphire Fury X / Areca 1680 / 850W EVGA SuperNOVA Gold 2 / Corsair 600T / 2x Dell 3007 / 4 x 250GB SSD + 2 x 80GB SSD / 4 x 1TB HDD (RAID 10) / Windows 10 Pro, Yosemite & Ubuntu
HTPC: AsRock Z77 Pro 4 / 3770K@4.2GHz / 24GB / GTX 1080 / SST-LC20 / Antec TP-550 / Hisense 65k5510 4K TV / HTC Vive / 2 x 240GB SSD + 12TB HDD Space / Race Seat / Logitech G29 / Win 10 Pro
HTPC2: Asus AM1I-A / 5150 / 4GB / Corsair Force 3 240GB / Silverstone SST-ML05B + ST30SF / Samsung UE60H6200 TV / Windows 10 Pro
Spare/Loaner: Gigabyte EX58-UD5 / i950 / 12GB / HD7870 / Corsair 300R / Silverpower 700W modular
NAS 1: HP N40L / 12GB ECC RAM / 2 x 3TB Arrays || NAS 2: Dell PowerEdge T110 II / 24GB ECC RAM / 2 x 3TB Hybrid arrays || Network:Buffalo WZR-1166DHP w/DD-WRT + HP ProCurve 1800-24G
Laptop: Dell Precision 5510 Printer: HP CP1515n || Phone: Huawei P30 || Other: Samsung Galaxy Tab 4 Pro 10.1 CM14 / Playstation 4 + G29 + 2TB Hybrid drive
There's a downlaodable file of min/Avg/Max speeds by postcode from Ofcom here.
http://maps.ofcom.org.uk/broadband/
My postcode has average speed ranges from 0.4mbs to 16.8mbs. However a lot of outliers have been excluded as insufficient data. So tough biscuits if you live in a group of houses/new development just outside town.
Society's to blame,
Or possibly Atari.
"Fiber to the x (FTTX) is a generic term for any broadband network architecture using optical fiber to replace all or part of the usual metal local loop used for last-mile telecommunications. The term is a generalization for several configurations of fiber deployment, ranging from FTTN (fiber to the neighborhood) to FTTD (fiber to the desk)."
Sounds like a hybrid.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)