Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 16 of 32

Thread: Reviews - Asus PQ321Q 4K Gaming Tried and Tested: Titan, 780 and 7970

  1. #1
    HEXUS.admin
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    31,709
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    2,073 times in 719 posts

    Reviews - Asus PQ321Q 4K Gaming Tried and Tested: Titan, 780 and 7970

    What's it like gaming on a lush 4K monitor?
    Read more.

  2. #2
    Registered+
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Posts
    20
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    2 times in 2 posts

    Re: Reviews - Asus PQ321Q 4K Gaming Tried and Tested: Titan, 780 and 7970

    I would prefer to have a solid 120 FPS on every title rather than stupid-high resolution.

  3. #3
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Location
    North West, UK
    Posts
    584
    Thanks
    22
    Thanked
    38 times in 32 posts
    • big_hairy_rob's system
      • Motherboard:
      • ASUS Z170-A
      • CPU:
      • Intel I5 6600k
      • Memory:
      • 16GB DDR4 Corsair Vengence (3000mhz)
      • Storage:
      • Samsung 850 500GB, WD Blue 1TB
      • Graphics card(s):
      • MSI Radeon R9 275
      • PSU:
      • EVGA 550W (80 plus Gold)
      • Case:
      • Fractal Design S (Windowed)
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 10 64.
      • Monitor(s):
      • Iiyama ProLite E24B3HS 24", LG Flatron L1950SQ19"
      • Internet:
      • Plusnet (infinity)

    Re: Reviews - Asus PQ321Q 4K Gaming Tried and Tested: Titan, 780 and 7970

    Why is it, that the most popular games, are not those that necessarily look the best, but those that have the best game play. For me, this is a step too far. As for how much I'd pay? Well I won't pay what it costs to get your average 46" HD TV, so I probably wouldn't buy one, unless they were competitively priced with standard screens. I cannot even justify the cost to buy the top end GPU required to use it.

  4. #4
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    326
    Thanks
    20
    Thanked
    29 times in 24 posts

    Re: Reviews - Asus PQ321Q 4K Gaming Tried and Tested: Titan, 780 and 7970

    I'm still waiting for a decent 2,560x1,440 screen (pref IPS, a reasonable refresh rate and not too much lag) that doesn't break the bank.

  5. #5
    Spreadie
    Guest

    Re: Reviews - Asus PQ321Q 4K Gaming Tried and Tested: Titan, 780 and 7970

    It's going to be a looong time before I can afford a 4K screen, and even longer before I can justify buying one; especially as it would mean a heavy GPU investment.

    I'm happy as I am.

  6. #6
    Banhammer in peace PeterB kalniel's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    31,039
    Thanks
    1,880
    Thanked
    3,379 times in 2,716 posts
    • kalniel's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Gigabyte Z390 Aorus Ultra
      • CPU:
      • Intel i9 9900k
      • Memory:
      • 32GB DDR4 3200 CL16
      • Storage:
      • 1TB Samsung 970Evo+ NVMe
      • Graphics card(s):
      • nVidia GTX 1060 6GB
      • PSU:
      • Seasonic 600W
      • Case:
      • Cooler Master HAF 912
      • Operating System:
      • Win 10 Pro x64
      • Monitor(s):
      • Dell S2721DGF
      • Internet:
      • rubbish

    Re: Reviews - Asus PQ321Q 4K Gaming Tried and Tested: Titan, 780 and 7970

    Is screen tearing more noticeable on these massive displays? I definitely think ultra resolution is going to be nice for some kinds of slower movement game - Civ 5 at 4k would be lush But others (driving games etc.) probably would do better with better response times - anytime you get blur or pixel ghosting you've just killed any resolution advantage.

  7. #7
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    326
    Thanks
    20
    Thanked
    29 times in 24 posts

    Re: Reviews - Asus PQ321Q 4K Gaming Tried and Tested: Titan, 780 and 7970

    Quote Originally Posted by Tpyo View Post
    I'm still waiting for a decent 2,560x1,440 screen (pref IPS, a reasonable refresh rate and not too much lag) that doesn't break the bank.
    ...if they can do these resolutions on tiny tiny phone/tablet screens, why are most desktop/laptop offerings still stuck around my current [1920x1200 and (1366x768?), respectively] level?

  8. #8
    Banhammer in peace PeterB kalniel's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    31,039
    Thanks
    1,880
    Thanked
    3,379 times in 2,716 posts
    • kalniel's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Gigabyte Z390 Aorus Ultra
      • CPU:
      • Intel i9 9900k
      • Memory:
      • 32GB DDR4 3200 CL16
      • Storage:
      • 1TB Samsung 970Evo+ NVMe
      • Graphics card(s):
      • nVidia GTX 1060 6GB
      • PSU:
      • Seasonic 600W
      • Case:
      • Cooler Master HAF 912
      • Operating System:
      • Win 10 Pro x64
      • Monitor(s):
      • Dell S2721DGF
      • Internet:
      • rubbish

    Re: Reviews - Asus PQ321Q 4K Gaming Tried and Tested: Titan, 780 and 7970

    Quote Originally Posted by Tpyo View Post
    ...if they can do these resolutions on tiny tiny phone/tablet screens, why are most desktop/laptop offerings still stuck around my current [1920x1200 and (1366x768?), respectively] level?
    Much more expensive to scale up substrates to monitor/TV sizes, and a much smaller market to sell to.

  9. #9
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    326
    Thanks
    20
    Thanked
    29 times in 24 posts

    Re: Reviews - Asus PQ321Q 4K Gaming Tried and Tested: Titan, 780 and 7970

    Deleted: reason - Prev post now visible
    Last edited by Tpyo; 17-07-2013 at 02:08 PM.

  10. #10
    Headless Chicken Terbinator's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    7,670
    Thanks
    1,209
    Thanked
    727 times in 595 posts
    • Terbinator's system
      • Motherboard:
      • ASRock H61M
      • CPU:
      • Intel Xeon 1230-V3
      • Memory:
      • Geil Evo Corsa 2133/8GB
      • Storage:
      • M4 128GB, 2TB WD Red
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Gigabyte GTX Titan
      • PSU:
      • Corsair AX760i
      • Case:
      • Coolermaster 130
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 8.1 Pro
      • Monitor(s):
      • Dell Ultrasharp U2711H
      • Internet:
      • Virgin Media 60Mb.

    Re: Reviews - Asus PQ321Q 4K Gaming Tried and Tested: Titan, 780 and 7970

    My minor investigations into 4K and VRAM FWIW:
    http://forums.aria.co.uk/showthread....=1#post2371801
    Kalniel: "Nice review Tarinder - would it be possible to get a picture of the case when the components are installed (with the side off obviously)?"
    CAT-THE-FIFTH: "The Antec 300 is a case which has an understated and clean appearance which many people like. Not everyone is into e-peen looking computers which look like a cross between the imagination of a hyperactive 10 year old and a Frog."
    TKPeters: "Off to AVForum better Deal - £20+Vat for Free Shipping @ Scan"
    for all intents it seems to be the same card minus some gays name on it and a shielded cover ? with OEM added to it - GoNz0.

  11. #11
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Oxford
    Posts
    510
    Thanks
    8
    Thanked
    45 times in 34 posts
    • Roobubba's system
      • Motherboard:
      • MSI P55 GD60
      • CPU:
      • Intel i7 860 @ 3.58GHz (Megahalems + Apache)
      • Memory:
      • 8GB Patriot Viper DDR3
      • Storage:
      • 80GB Intel X25-M + bunch of HDDs
      • Graphics card(s):
      • ATI 5870 + Earplugs.
      • PSU:
      • TAGAN 800W
      • Case:
      • Lian Li V1110 (bit disappointing)
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 7 Pro
      • Monitor(s):
      • Samsung 24" LCD (TN)
      • Internet:
      • Virgin Media 20MBit

    Re: Reviews - Asus PQ321Q 4K Gaming Tried and Tested: Titan, 780 and 7970

    Higher pixel density is nice, but without 120Hz I'm afraid it's of no interest to me. I'm holding off for as long as I can until SOMEONE gets their act together on a 1440p 120Hz (out of the box) display. :/

  12. #12
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    Kingdom O Fife
    Posts
    288
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    15 times in 13 posts
    • zaph0d's system
      • Motherboard:
      • MSI X570-A Pro
      • CPU:
      • AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
      • Memory:
      • 48GB - 2X 32GB and 2X 16GB at 3200
      • Storage:
      • 480GB NVME (OS) 2TB 8 Drive sas Raid0 (Games)
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Geforce 1070
      • PSU:
      • 1000W Coolermaster
      • Case:
      • Lian Li PC-343B (Original Model)
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 10 Pro 64bit
      • Monitor(s):
      • 2X 55" Samsung 4k tv's
      • Internet:
      • Virgin 500Mb

    Re: Reviews - Asus PQ321Q 4K Gaming Tried and Tested: Titan, 780 and 7970

    I'm using a 37" lg 3dtv as my monitor, it sits 4ft in front of me on the desk, takes up as much desk space as a conventionally sized monitor (in terms of the stand), gives me a large viewing area which allows me to sit back in a nice comfy reclining armchair with keyboard on lap and mouse on the substantial arm of the chair. At that distance the pixel density is perfect for reading etc, large enough screen for peripheral vision to be used without the need for multiple screens and only uses about 30w to boot.
    I doubt I'll ever buy a screen with a higher pixel density as this is just fine for distance/size/density at 4ft.
    I will however get the Oculus Rift when that comes along in retail as then you'll have something with excelent apparant screen size, truly immersive 3d and good pixel density (they're deciding between 1080p,1440p and 1600p screen)

  13. #13
    jim
    jim is offline
    HEXUS.clueless jim's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Location: Location:
    Posts
    11,466
    Thanks
    614
    Thanked
    1,649 times in 1,310 posts
    • jim's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Asus Maximus IV Gene-Z
      • CPU:
      • i5 2500K @ 4.5GHz
      • Memory:
      • 8GB Corsair Vengeance LP
      • Storage:
      • 1TB Sandisk SSD
      • Graphics card(s):
      • ASUS GTX 970
      • PSU:
      • Corsair AX650
      • Case:
      • Silverstone Fortress FT03
      • Operating System:
      • 8.1 Pro
      • Monitor(s):
      • Dell S2716DG
      • Internet:
      • 10 Mbps ADSL

    Re: Reviews - Asus PQ321Q 4K Gaming Tried and Tested: Titan, 780 and 7970

    As soon as 4K panels become a bit more affordable, I'll definitely be buying one. I don't care about 120Hz, or FPS, or whatever - resolution is far and away the most important thing to me right now.

    I currently have 3840*1080, and I still feel like I'm peeking through a letterbox at webpages, documents and so on. More pixels just makes everything a heck of a lot easier, and more enjoyable.

    4K with two portrait 1080p panels either side would be perfect, I think

  14. Received thanks from:

    Pleiades (18-07-2013)

  15. #14
    Senior Member cptwhite_uk's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Posts
    4,457
    Thanks
    516
    Thanked
    689 times in 477 posts
    • cptwhite_uk's system
      • Motherboard:
      • ASUS TUF B650 Plus Wifi
      • CPU:
      • AMD Ryzen 7800X3D
      • Memory:
      • 32Gb DRR5 6400 C32 Team Group T-Create
      • Storage:
      • 4Tb Crucial P3 Plus
      • Graphics card(s):
      • RTX 4080 20Gb Gigabyte Gaming OC
      • PSU:
      • Silverstone 850W 80+ Gold
      • Case:
      • Fractal North Charcoal / Walnut
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 10 Pro
      • Monitor(s):
      • Gigabyte M28U (4K 144Hz)
      • Internet:
      • BT 500 Mbps

    Re: Reviews - Asus PQ321Q 4K Gaming Tried and Tested: Titan, 780 and 7970

    I'm thinking Red Alert 2 maps without the need to pan, at all

  16. #15
    jim
    jim is offline
    HEXUS.clueless jim's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Location: Location:
    Posts
    11,466
    Thanks
    614
    Thanked
    1,649 times in 1,310 posts
    • jim's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Asus Maximus IV Gene-Z
      • CPU:
      • i5 2500K @ 4.5GHz
      • Memory:
      • 8GB Corsair Vengeance LP
      • Storage:
      • 1TB Sandisk SSD
      • Graphics card(s):
      • ASUS GTX 970
      • PSU:
      • Corsair AX650
      • Case:
      • Silverstone Fortress FT03
      • Operating System:
      • 8.1 Pro
      • Monitor(s):
      • Dell S2716DG
      • Internet:
      • 10 Mbps ADSL

    Re: Reviews - Asus PQ321Q 4K Gaming Tried and Tested: Titan, 780 and 7970

    Even Generals/Zero Hour looks ridiculous on a modern high-res monitor, if you fiddle with the ini files to make the map display properly.

  17. #16
    Registered+
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Posts
    33
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    1 time in 1 post

    Re: Reviews - Asus PQ321Q 4K Gaming Tried and Tested: Titan, 780 and 7970

    I think I'll stick to my 2560x1440p monitor until the price goes down. GTX 780 SLI is going to be good enough to push most titles without dipping below 60 FPS.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •