Read more.In current OLEDs only a quarter of the energy input goes into producing light.
Read more.In current OLEDs only a quarter of the energy input goes into producing light.
Anyone else worried by this line:
Is it just me, or is he basically saying that he doesn't know why this happens?“It appears that, in our OLEDs, the molecules can store electrical energy for significantly longer than is conventionally assumed,” said Chemistry Professor Sigurd Höger of the University of Bonn.
He knows why:
And now so do youOriginally Posted by the paper
The appears to thingy is probably because by doing so they're bypassing a convention on internal radiation conversion - they're not actually breaking it, they're working around it.
I always thought OLED was really efficient with its energy use ! I hope this new tech will apply to lcd, plasma etc
LEDs are not very efficient either, around the 25% range. They too lose the energy as heat. It will be interesting to see if this spills over to the huge LED lighting market, the more efficient the better.
Well you know why now, you just don't *understand* why
My guess: By storing charge longer, there's time for more of the magnetic moments flip to a beneficial arrangement that means less repelling and thus wasting of energy as heat.
heat? really?
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)