Results 1 to 9 of 9

Thread: Reviews - Gigabyte Radeon R9 290X WindForce OC

  1. #1
    HEXUS.admin
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    31,709
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    2,073 times in 719 posts

    Reviews - Gigabyte Radeon R9 290X WindForce OC

    AMD's finest gets the WindForce OC treatment.
    Read more.

  2. #2
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Manchester
    Posts
    1,731
    Thanks
    59
    Thanked
    141 times in 110 posts
    • Percy1983's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Gigabyte x570 Aorus Pro
      • CPU:
      • AMD 5900x + Cooler Master Nepton 140XL
      • Memory:
      • 64GB (4x16GB ) Corsair Vengence 3200mhz @ 3600mhz CL16
      • Storage:
      • 1tb SP US75 Boot + Fast 4tb SP XS70 + Slow Raid 0 4tb (2tbx2) with 100gb NVME cache
      • Graphics card(s):
      • RX6800 16GB (XFX SWFT 319)
      • PSU:
      • 875w Thermaltake Toughpower XT
      • Case:
      • Thermaltake Level 10 GT Snow Edition
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 11 Pro 64bit
      • Monitor(s):
      • 24" Acer UHD x2
      • Internet:
      • Vodafone

    Re: Reviews - Gigabyte Radeon R9 290X WindForce OC

    I will say I have the windforce 7950 and the cooler is amazing, would interested to see how this would go on a 290.

  3. #3
    Registered+
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Posts
    26
    Thanks
    2
    Thanked
    0 times in 0 posts

    Re: Reviews - Gigabyte Radeon R9 290X WindForce OC

    Sorry , but even WITH the excellent cooler its not going to help since the price is overly inflated atm . Amd is going to keep shooting itself if does not get a handle on pricing and availability . By the time Amd does correct the situation it probably will be too little too late and they will have already lost their market share to the Ti (at the going price) .

    *edited: Its a shame too , as I was (fairly) interested and willing to give Amd a nice try again (even at retail pricing) after years of Nvidia ; but not even going there with the current inflated market price . Guess I'll just keep my 780 for now .

    Thx for the review Hexus.
    Last edited by stereo55; 13-01-2014 at 03:19 AM.

  4. #4
    Registered+
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    Jakarta
    Posts
    36
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    0 times in 0 posts
    • clovy's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Gigabyte P67A-UD3R B3
      • CPU:
      • i5 2500K
      • Memory:
      • Corsair Vengeance 8GB Dual Kit 1600Mhz
      • Storage:
      • Seagate 250Gb + 500GB Sata III
      • Graphics card(s):
      • MSI GTX 660 Twin Frozr III
      • PSU:
      • Corsair TX650
      • Case:
      • Cooler Master HAF 912 Advanced
      • Operating System:
      • Win 7 Ultimate
      • Monitor(s):
      • Samsung
      • Internet:
      • Up to 2Mbps

    Re: Reviews - Gigabyte Radeon R9 290X WindForce OC

    This product is great, but i concern with the price..

  5. #5
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    406
    Thanks
    3
    Thanked
    13 times in 13 posts
    • Agrippa's system
      • Motherboard:
      • ASRock X299 Taichi XE
      • CPU:
      • Intel i7 7820X @ 4.8GHz (delid)
      • Memory:
      • 4x8GB G.Skill TridentZ DDR4-3200 C14 @ 3600 CL15
      • Storage:
      • Samsung SM961 256GB, 850 EVO 1TBx2, 850 EVO 250GB, 840 512GB, Seagate 1TB, 2TB, 8x8TB
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Asus GTX 1080 Ti RoG Strix
      • PSU:
      • Corsair RM1000x
      • Case:
      • Lian Li D8000
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 10 Pro x64
      • Monitor(s):
      • Acer Predator Z35P
      • Internet:
      • 500/500 Fiber

    Re: Reviews - Gigabyte Radeon R9 290X WindForce OC

    To be honest, the most striking thing about this review and the included graphs is how close the Sapphire 290 Tri-X comes in terms of performance and for a fair bit less money. I'm sure the 290X will become a better and better deal as time rolls on, but for now there's no way I'd buy one. That 290 Tri-X however....

  6. #6
    F.A.S.T. Butuz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Wales
    Posts
    4,708
    Thanks
    51
    Thanked
    72 times in 59 posts
    • Butuz's system
      • Motherboard:
      • MSI Z77 MPOWER
      • CPU:
      • I7 3770K @ 4.6
      • Memory:
      • 16GB Corsair XMS 1866
      • Storage:
      • Sandisk SSDs
      • Graphics card(s):
      • 3xR9 290
      • PSU:
      • be quiet! Dark Power Pro 10
      • Case:
      • Inwin H Frame
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 7

    Re: Reviews - Gigabyte Radeon R9 290X WindForce OC

    It looks to be a good cooler - one thing to note is, you don't really need to keep the R290/X at 75 degrees as it's designed to run in the 90s and the VRMS run cooler than the 79x0 series. I would use MSI Afterburner to create a custom fan profile to keep the card at about 80-85 degrees and lower the noise considerably. It suddenly becomes a winner on your benchmarks at 85 degrees and (my estimate) ~38db.

    Be interesting if hexus could try it out and add it to the review!!

  7. #7
    Registered User
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Posts
    4
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    0 times in 0 posts

    Re: Reviews - Gigabyte Radeon R9 290X WindForce OC

    290x with current prices is not good deal. There is whole range of factory overclocked 780s that are fast as it if not faster, cooler, more quiet and less expensive. Miners totally ruined 290 GPUs. Mantle wont help either exp. in BF4 but thats only one game and who knows what and when follows..

  8. #8
    Banhammer in peace PeterB kalniel's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    31,038
    Thanks
    1,878
    Thanked
    3,379 times in 2,716 posts
    • kalniel's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Gigabyte Z390 Aorus Ultra
      • CPU:
      • Intel i9 9900k
      • Memory:
      • 32GB DDR4 3200 CL16
      • Storage:
      • 1TB Samsung 970Evo+ NVMe
      • Graphics card(s):
      • nVidia GTX 1060 6GB
      • PSU:
      • Seasonic 600W
      • Case:
      • Cooler Master HAF 912
      • Operating System:
      • Win 10 Pro x64
      • Monitor(s):
      • Dell S2721DGF
      • Internet:
      • rubbish

    Re: Reviews - Gigabyte Radeon R9 290X WindForce OC

    Quote Originally Posted by roki977 View Post
    290x with current prices is not good deal. There is whole range of factory overclocked 780s that are fast as it if not faster, cooler, more quiet and less expensive.
    Well not really - at higher resolutions the 290X really is a much much better card than an overclocked 780. But yes, the 780 can be quieter, if that's your primary concern.

    Mantle wont help either exp. in BF4 but thats only one game
    +thief
    +star citizen
    +Dragon Age: Inquisition
    +mirrors edge
    +future need for speed
    +future mass effect
    etc.

  9. #9
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    West Sussex
    Posts
    1,722
    Thanks
    199
    Thanked
    243 times in 223 posts
    • kompukare's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Asus P8Z77-V LX
      • CPU:
      • Intel i5-3570K
      • Memory:
      • 4 x 8GB DDR3
      • Storage:
      • Samsung 850 EVo 500GB | Corsair MP510 960GB | 2 x WD 4TB spinners
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Sappihre R7 260X 1GB (sic)
      • PSU:
      • Antec 650 Gold TruePower (Seasonic)
      • Case:
      • Aerocool DS 200 (silenced, 53.6 litres)l)
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 10-64
      • Monitor(s):
      • 2 x ViewSonic 27" 1440p

    Re: Reviews - Gigabyte Radeon R9 290X WindForce OC

    Quote Originally Posted by Butuz View Post
    It looks to be a good cooler - one thing to note is, you don't really need to keep the R290/X at 75 degrees as it's designed to run in the 90s and the VRMS run cooler than the 79x0 series.
    The power consumption should a bit worse at those higher temps though. 70-70C vs 90-95C can be around 30W or more. That's going by those DIY Arctic Cooling reviews done by HT4U.net and Tom's. But it is hard to see that with different custom reviews since
    • a) it's not the same chip (Silicon lottery and ASIC quality has a big bearing on leakage current etc.
    • b) it's not the same card (look at the recent discussion on motherboard power consumption figures in the AMD - Piledriver chitchat thread: uk.hardware.info found the difference between the most efficient AM2+ board and the least efficient was 51W; or in other words at Cinebench 11.5 full load the worst board used 47% more.



    Also, despite what AMD spec I would prefer not to run at those temperatures. While I do believe that AMD actually do proper testing (unlike Nvidia who messed up big time with their 65nm parts, aka bumpgate) I would still be more comfortable at 75-80C.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •