Read more.Wearable smart band is available for $199 today in the US, in limited quantities.
Read more.Wearable smart band is available for $199 today in the US, in limited quantities.
First Microsoft product for ages that I think actually looks rather interesting.
Cost is about the same as my wife's Garmin, and looks to be better in functionality (specially the sunscreen warning). It would have to have a battery that can last the length of a marathon if it doesn't already.
Mind you, if it can track rapid wrist movements and heart rate then Microsoft could learn some interesting habits about it's users
MaddAussie (30-10-2014)
Now all we need a technical review of this and the Basis Peak (not a fashion review). I wonder which one has the better sensors...
I was thinking 40 miles duration when running, comfortably within the 26 miles needed for a marathon.
Have you seen how cross a runner gets if their Garmin dies half a mile from the finish line? Several hours of GPS data logging is quite battery intensive though, so I don't know if the technology is up to being in a device this small yet. Just a matter of time if it isn't though, such is the way of technology.
OTOH, people like my wife who do half marathons are probably a much bigger audience.
Haven't previously been at all interested in these bands, but for some reason this one is intriguing me... Sounds more like a decent smartwatch, just in band form. Plus I have a Lumia phone so would be a natural choice... tempting! If it ever comes to the UK, that is...
"I want to be young and wild, then I want to be middle aged and rich, then I want to be old and annoy people by pretending that I'm deaf..."
my Hexus.Trust
It's more that this is everything in one package, that is cross platform.
It's very compelling and I'm asking a mate of mine in the states if he can pick one up for me before he returns.
throw new ArgumentException (String, String, Exception)
Problem I find with tracking runs, apps using mobile GPS or dedicated hardware is that they have an all-or-nothing approach. If the battery fails at 90% then you have no data. If it failed, but I still had all that information it would be annoying, but not a wasted run. Not sure how you can avoid that beside hard logging to an SD card as you go or uploading to the cloud.
Probably could have done with some solar and/or motion powering to keep it going longer.
Main PC: Asus Rampage IV Extreme / 3960X@4.5GHz / Antec H1200 Pro / 32GB DDR3-1866 Quad Channel / Sapphire Fury X / Areca 1680 / 850W EVGA SuperNOVA Gold 2 / Corsair 600T / 2x Dell 3007 / 4 x 250GB SSD + 2 x 80GB SSD / 4 x 1TB HDD (RAID 10) / Windows 10 Pro, Yosemite & Ubuntu
HTPC: AsRock Z77 Pro 4 / 3770K@4.2GHz / 24GB / GTX 1080 / SST-LC20 / Antec TP-550 / Hisense 65k5510 4K TV / HTC Vive / 2 x 240GB SSD + 12TB HDD Space / Race Seat / Logitech G29 / Win 10 Pro
HTPC2: Asus AM1I-A / 5150 / 4GB / Corsair Force 3 240GB / Silverstone SST-ML05B + ST30SF / Samsung UE60H6200 TV / Windows 10 Pro
Spare/Loaner: Gigabyte EX58-UD5 / i950 / 12GB / HD7870 / Corsair 300R / Silverpower 700W modular
NAS 1: HP N40L / 12GB ECC RAM / 2 x 3TB Arrays || NAS 2: Dell PowerEdge T110 II / 24GB ECC RAM / 2 x 3TB Hybrid arrays || Network:Buffalo WZR-1166DHP w/DD-WRT + HP ProCurve 1800-24G
Laptop: Dell Precision 5510 Printer: HP CP1515n || Phone: Huawei P30 || Other: Samsung Galaxy Tab 4 Pro 10.1 CM14 / Playstation 4 + G29 + 2TB Hybrid drive
throw new ArgumentException (String, String, Exception)
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)