Read more.The update should begin rolling out to Nexus devices today.
Read more.The update should begin rolling out to Nexus devices today.
Been playing with 5.1 on my Nexus 5 this morning (had to manually update it) and Device Protection does not work on the N5 which is a bit disappointing but not surprising I suppose. I presume it's using some kind of Knox lite implementation so I'm not sure why it wont work on the N5.
Nice incremental update, however, the problem continues. The updates are so slow to get to the consumer unless they are using a Nexus device you've forgotten about the benefits when it arrives!
Steam - ReapedYou - Feel free to add me!!
Main PC: Asus Rampage IV Extreme / 3960X@4.5GHz / Antec H1200 Pro / 32GB DDR3-1866 Quad Channel / Sapphire Fury X / Areca 1680 / 850W EVGA SuperNOVA Gold 2 / Corsair 600T / 2x Dell 3007 / 4 x 250GB SSD + 2 x 80GB SSD / 4 x 1TB HDD (RAID 10) / Windows 10 Pro, Yosemite & Ubuntu
HTPC: AsRock Z77 Pro 4 / 3770K@4.2GHz / 24GB / GTX 1080 / SST-LC20 / Antec TP-550 / Hisense 65k5510 4K TV / HTC Vive / 2 x 240GB SSD + 12TB HDD Space / Race Seat / Logitech G29 / Win 10 Pro
HTPC2: Asus AM1I-A / 5150 / 4GB / Corsair Force 3 240GB / Silverstone SST-ML05B + ST30SF / Samsung UE60H6200 TV / Windows 10 Pro
Spare/Loaner: Gigabyte EX58-UD5 / i950 / 12GB / HD7870 / Corsair 300R / Silverpower 700W modular
NAS 1: HP N40L / 12GB ECC RAM / 2 x 3TB Arrays || NAS 2: Dell PowerEdge T110 II / 24GB ECC RAM / 2 x 3TB Hybrid arrays || Network:Buffalo WZR-1166DHP w/DD-WRT + HP ProCurve 1800-24G
Laptop: Dell Precision 5510 Printer: HP CP1515n || Phone: Huawei P30 || Other: Samsung Galaxy Tab 4 Pro 10.1 CM14 / Playstation 4 + G29 + 2TB Hybrid drive
WRT the above (Jowsey) - are you using a non-Nexus device, and if so how have you found 5.0 (if you have it)?
See, I do have a Nexus 4 and Android 5.0 has been a massive headache for me; I'd happily trade that for waiting a few months for a more stable version. I started a thread about my experience with 5.0 so won't go over it all again, but I was getting ready to roll back to 4.4.4 if 5.1 didn't arrive soon, it's that bad.
I don't see the 5.1 images available for the Nexus 4 yet so hopefully they'll appear soon and be available OTA shortly thereafter, and not add any regressions.
I'll be sure to post an update when I've had a chance to test it.
Just to clarify, I have rooted my HTC One and I'm running a custom ROM ( still on 4.4.4, I think ). I mean the 80% of people who own an android device who haven't rooted there phone or haven't got a flagship phone and therefore are basically second class citizens for updates!
Re the nexus 4, my girlfriend has a N4, and 5.0 is fine on her phone, I have heard complaints though.
I have avoided 5.0 completely so far as I have heard so many people report really stupid bugs in the interface. I got the update on my Moto G today and just clicked, 'not right now'.
4.4.4 is incredibly stable and works well on all my devices, so I'm in no rush to upgrade. I'll see how things go with 5.1 but if they screw it up again it might be time to start considering how Windows Phone and iOS compare at the moment.
How odd....
I upgraded my M7 in December with an unofficial early leaked HTC ROM and the ONLY problems I have faced were the in-built alarm would fail 1 in 20 times and the in-built torch app would turn off when the display sleep timer was triggered. The later releases seems to have fixed those issues, although they were both very minor issues fixed with app downloads.
In early January I upgraded my Galaxy Tab 4 to Cyanogenmod 12 (nightly builds) and haven't had a single problem with that.
Both of them have better battery then before as well.
Perhaps I was lucky and both HTC and the Cyanogenmod team were extremely fast to fix the issues that were causing so many issues but so far I have found LP to be the best release to date.
Main PC: Asus Rampage IV Extreme / 3960X@4.5GHz / Antec H1200 Pro / 32GB DDR3-1866 Quad Channel / Sapphire Fury X / Areca 1680 / 850W EVGA SuperNOVA Gold 2 / Corsair 600T / 2x Dell 3007 / 4 x 250GB SSD + 2 x 80GB SSD / 4 x 1TB HDD (RAID 10) / Windows 10 Pro, Yosemite & Ubuntu
HTPC: AsRock Z77 Pro 4 / 3770K@4.2GHz / 24GB / GTX 1080 / SST-LC20 / Antec TP-550 / Hisense 65k5510 4K TV / HTC Vive / 2 x 240GB SSD + 12TB HDD Space / Race Seat / Logitech G29 / Win 10 Pro
HTPC2: Asus AM1I-A / 5150 / 4GB / Corsair Force 3 240GB / Silverstone SST-ML05B + ST30SF / Samsung UE60H6200 TV / Windows 10 Pro
Spare/Loaner: Gigabyte EX58-UD5 / i950 / 12GB / HD7870 / Corsair 300R / Silverpower 700W modular
NAS 1: HP N40L / 12GB ECC RAM / 2 x 3TB Arrays || NAS 2: Dell PowerEdge T110 II / 24GB ECC RAM / 2 x 3TB Hybrid arrays || Network:Buffalo WZR-1166DHP w/DD-WRT + HP ProCurve 1800-24G
Laptop: Dell Precision 5510 Printer: HP CP1515n || Phone: Huawei P30 || Other: Samsung Galaxy Tab 4 Pro 10.1 CM14 / Playstation 4 + G29 + 2TB Hybrid drive
Most of the issues I listed in the other thread are blanket problems i.e. affect everyone as they're clear software bugs/bad UI choices. However some are more variable e.g. terrible battery life vs 4.4.4, and some people have had some success by doing a factory reset.
TBH I'd say having to wait a while longer for what isn't a particularly special update isn't what I'd consider a big deal if it means it has been properly tested and fixed vs rushing obviously broken and untested software out of the door.
It's starting to seem par-for-the-course for some Google products sadly. A rather funny (though not for the huge amount of people affected) issue is Youtube essentially breaking on a huge number of Bay Trail based Chromebooks. In their infinite wisdom they've decided to force their VP9 codec on all (non-mobile) devices, including those without the ability to play it smoothly. Whereas h264 has hardware decode support on most new devices (including Bay Trail) so plays fine, VP9 is pretty much universally software-only and it takes quite a bit of grunt to do it. Apparently testing and usability are far down the ladder of concerns when an idea is pushed out. VP9 isn't ready for the Internet, and the Internet isn't ready for VP9. It's really quite frightening that no-one spotted that sort of issue in early development; anyone with a basic knowledge of video decoding would see that coming.
@shaithis: You're talking about manufacturer-tested and third-party ROMs, not the horribly broken stock images release by Google themselves, hence my point.
Last edited by watercooled; 10-03-2015 at 04:16 PM.
It's very likely. Right click on the video and select 'stats for nerds', it should tell you the codec used.
A 'fix' for the time being is, rather ironically, to use Firefox as it still uses Flash and hence h264 for Youtube.
Edit: The sad thing is, unless Google does the sensible thing and goes back to h264 for the time being, this problem isn't likely to go away any time soon as VP9 isn't even in the pipeline for hardware decode for Intel/AMD/Nvidia AFAIK, let alone in any products. I wonder how many people this is impacting in drastically reduced battery life on laptops, even for those with the ability to play it back smoothly?
Last edited by watercooled; 10-03-2015 at 04:24 PM.
Not all devices have decent encryption performance.
http://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2015/...es-by-default/
Full device encryption is yet another shining example of terrible execution, and quite comparable to the VP9 disaster. They both need hardware support to function effectively, and both are currently missing in the vast majority of devices.
Do you have the Flash plugin installed? If not, maybe FF now supports VP9 HTML5 video as a fallback?
Last edited by watercooled; 10-03-2015 at 04:34 PM. Reason: Reworded for clarity.
What is it with tech announcements today - first a distinctly "meh" one from Apple and now Google seem to be trying to match them for boredom.
Hmm, Motorola and LG were quite quick off the mark with KK to L updates. Unfortunately the downside was that the L update delivered was pretty dire - dire enough to make one start looking longingly at an iPhone. From what's been said on XDA though, it was Google wot done it, and the base OS was the problem, not Moto/LG's implementation.
That said, my G3 got "L mk 2" from LG and it's actually very usable.
Yep, Nexus folks are at the head of the queue, then this years flagship;
then this years midrange and last years flagships;
and if you're on budget or 18 months+ models then ... good luck!
Oh and if you're carrier-locked then you're a step behind where you would be - which is one reason why I buy SIM-free phones these days.
Irrespective of my objections to iOS, OS upgrades is just a place where Apple consistently gets it right and Google ends up looking stupid.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)