Read more.These LGA 1150 compatible unlocked chips will be released during Q2, says report.
Read more.These LGA 1150 compatible unlocked chips will be released during Q2, says report.
So I can get a chip clocked at a lower speed than the i7-4770 with less cache and glued to a still useless piece of graphics hardware .... Wow where to I sign up.
I can see why they aren't really bothering till Skylake.
Less L3 cache perhaps, but far more cache total when you factor in the L4 which should be the same 128MB Crystalwell die as Haswell (although I have also seen the 64MB figure bandied about). And if you compare 4770R with 6MB L3 and Crystalwell to the standard or K-variant 4770 with 8MB L3 it seems more than a fair trade off.
4 Cores 4 Threads, Less L3 cache, Lower clocked speed. Is this an upgrade from i7 4790k? maybe it can do more with less like they said. Is this what i was waiting for?
Definitely underwhelmed. I'll be waiting for Skylake then...
Millennium (24-03-2015)
They released a bunch of spiel a way back, the productivity increase- 4% bit was well hidden by the trumping of the graphics improvements. Ivybridge to Haswell was very roughly 6%, so not impressive.
It's understandable to a degree though.....
Hardly anything is pushing the CPU these days but integrated graphics is the "in thing". In those 4 years, how much has the IGP increased?
Now, I would love a cheap mainstream desktop CPU that has 6 phat cores, instead of 4, but I doubt we are going to see that any time soon, hence I am sticking with ivybridge still. See that as an upshot of the situation, no need to upgrade for YEARS
Main PC: Asus Rampage IV Extreme / 3960X@4.5GHz / Antec H1200 Pro / 32GB DDR3-1866 Quad Channel / Sapphire Fury X / Areca 1680 / 850W EVGA SuperNOVA Gold 2 / Corsair 600T / 2x Dell 3007 / 4 x 250GB SSD + 2 x 80GB SSD / 4 x 1TB HDD (RAID 10) / Windows 10 Pro, Yosemite & Ubuntu
HTPC: AsRock Z77 Pro 4 / 3770K@4.2GHz / 24GB / GTX 1080 / SST-LC20 / Antec TP-550 / Hisense 65k5510 4K TV / HTC Vive / 2 x 240GB SSD + 12TB HDD Space / Race Seat / Logitech G29 / Win 10 Pro
HTPC2: Asus AM1I-A / 5150 / 4GB / Corsair Force 3 240GB / Silverstone SST-ML05B + ST30SF / Samsung UE60H6200 TV / Windows 10 Pro
Spare/Loaner: Gigabyte EX58-UD5 / i950 / 12GB / HD7870 / Corsair 300R / Silverpower 700W modular
NAS 1: HP N40L / 12GB ECC RAM / 2 x 3TB Arrays || NAS 2: Dell PowerEdge T110 II / 24GB ECC RAM / 2 x 3TB Hybrid arrays || Network:Buffalo WZR-1166DHP w/DD-WRT + HP ProCurve 1800-24G
Laptop: Dell Precision 5510 Printer: HP CP1515n || Phone: Huawei P30 || Other: Samsung Galaxy Tab 4 Pro 10.1 CM14 / Playstation 4 + G29 + 2TB Hybrid drive
If you want six Phat cores cheap you can get them - but it'll be an ex-server X5650 socket 1366 32nm chip though.
Plus sides include: Triple Channel memory, Great Performance/Price ratio (chips are about £50-70 on eBay) & It's pretty cool running, for example my old i7-920 could clock to 3.6GHz and would sit at 75C under full load, the X5650 will sit at 4GHz full load at 58 (both temps measured during summer with room temp of 24C)
Down sides include: It's a second hand server chip, it's a 32nm chip so it's not quite as efficient as newer models but was rated 95W-TDP @ 2.66GHz.
Still it's a good all-rounder. Mines is running @ 4GHz with all the power-saving and hyper-threading etc turned on. I'm still withing intel's specs for the voltage 1.31 of a max 1.35 if I remember correctly.
Plus if you want a cheap supercomputer you can get 2 of them and a workstation motherboard for £200-220 total, 12 Cores, 24 Threads and 96GB ram. OK so you can't overclock in a workstation board (unless you get the super ellusive SR-2) but it's still 12 cores... it'd make a great minecraft server-farm?
Millennium (24-03-2015)
My machine at work has a 6 phat cores (12 threads) Xeon which is 130W tdp: http://ark.intel.com/products/75780/...Cache-3_50-GHz
That is 22nm, rather expensive, and my point is that if Intel were not obsessed with "ultrabook" form factors to the point that their desktop offering here seems to be such a laptop device with the wick just turned up to 65W and no better, then they might produce something that made people sit up and think.
Technology improvements are supposed to make things either faster, or cheaper, not make them "meh"
Millennium (24-03-2015)
TBH the J2900 is a bit like a bike engine. Fine for light loads but for anything heavy it's pretty useless.
Probably just about passable, judging from the socket AM1 videos out there where people plug big video cards into their cheap motherboards and fire up games on them.
However ISTR that you only get 4 PCIe lanes on a J2900, so plugging in a graphics card disables anything else that might need PCIe in the system.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)