LinkBack URL
About LinkBacksRead more.Three HBM graphics cards and the twin GPU equipped Project Quantum mini PC.
Read more.Three HBM graphics cards and the twin GPU equipped Project Quantum mini PC.
It'll be interesting to see the reviews but the pricing looks better than expected. Just hope its not on a 1-1 exchange rate.
Sorry to make one of the first posts a correction but the Fury X comparisons were made to the 290X, not the 390X.
Are you allowed to say when you'll be allowed to publish the reviews? The Nano looks very intriguing...
mtyson (16-06-2015)
The fury pricing is much better than I expected, but it's a shame about the 390X pricing - that'll have to be a lot better than a 290X to be worth it. The quantum looks really neat - I'd be really surprised if it sold at all, but I like the design
I'd expect them posted on the release dates, which is an annoying waitOriginally Posted by NightshadowUK
They look like beasts. They had one of the cards running a 5K screen with what looked like Sniper Elite at 45FPS.
The Fury Nano looks like a really good card.
Surprised they didn't go back in time and called the dual 'Fuji' setup Fury MAXX.
So the 390x is a Fury X???
Damn naming is all confusing, I wish they would make it clearer!!!!
The R9 390 looks the most tempting. Hopefully they don't put it at 1:1 exchange rate for UK.
No. R7 & R9 3xx are (I assume) are rebadged cards. New HBM lineup are Fury cards.
Hmm... I'm more curious about the mini pc (and nano by association) than I am about the full size pcie graphics cards.
Nooo, the 300 series cards are based on current architecture but the Fury models will be made with the new Fiji GPU.
EDIT: Beaten to it.
Well maybe. AMD didn't go into that much detail. Did they talk about a R9 380X? I think that was missing from the line up.
Am I the only one supremely worried by the statement of it being a lot smaller PCB usage than usual ?
Because if that's the case, then that MASSIVE cooling setup is purely to cool the GPU, which at 275w is just gonna be pumping out more heat than my bum after a curry.
It seems that to make this chip perform anywhere as good as nvidia they've had to ramp up the clock speeds...as usual...and we get another toasty chip
No mention of a 380X but then I'd expect the 380 to use a tweaked Tonga (R9 295) GPU so there may be no need for one.
Last edited by NightshadowUK; 16-06-2015 at 08:32 PM.
ftfy
NightshadowUK (16-06-2015)
Yawn!!!! Just looked through the page, lots of nice pictures of a card and as far as I'm concerned no graphs + no figures = no substance.
All I want to know is, is it beast enough yet? Forget the foreplay, just get down to the nitty gritty already.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
