Read more.And a senior DICE developer says there will be no microtransactions in the game.
Read more.And a senior DICE developer says there will be no microtransactions in the game.
Looking forward game performance reviews that prove 16GB of RAM provides a worthwhile benefit to gameplay.
I'm going to call it now. The EA forums are going to light up like Christmas with posts from people complaining about performance problems on low-end gaming computers.
Well that's me out. #needanewcomputer
just built a new PC specifically for star wars and fallout 4
https://uk.pcpartpicker.com/b/MrjcCJ
Dang, those are some hefty minimum system requirements.
lol, with those requirements it's almost as if EA doesn't want people to play their games anymore....
I did a double take the other day when i found out those requirements.... so much higher than BF4, why?
Also, its been stated elsewhere that there is no server browser, only quick match-making, so how are you supposed to play with mates? I do have a PC capable of playing this without any problems, but now it is no longer a definate must buy... i am now almost definately not going to buy... if the server management game joining process doesn't allow total freedom to choose which server i am joining.
Surprised that 970 is the recommended card considering how good the graphics look in videos that I have seen so far.
This is of course assuming that recommended does not translate to 'high' but not 'ultra' settings.
pre load initiated
hexus trust : n(baby):n(lover):n(sky)|>P(Name)>>nopes
Be Careful on the Internet! I ran and tackled a drive by mining attack today. It's not designed to do anything than provide fake texts (say!)
will see if i can run the beta may be cancelling the pre order
Main PC: Asus Rampage IV Extreme / 3960X@4.5GHz / Antec H1200 Pro / 32GB DDR3-1866 Quad Channel / Sapphire Fury X / Areca 1680 / 850W EVGA SuperNOVA Gold 2 / Corsair 600T / 2x Dell 3007 / 4 x 250GB SSD + 2 x 80GB SSD / 4 x 1TB HDD (RAID 10) / Windows 10 Pro, Yosemite & Ubuntu
HTPC: AsRock Z77 Pro 4 / 3770K@4.2GHz / 24GB / GTX 1080 / SST-LC20 / Antec TP-550 / Hisense 65k5510 4K TV / HTC Vive / 2 x 240GB SSD + 12TB HDD Space / Race Seat / Logitech G29 / Win 10 Pro
HTPC2: Asus AM1I-A / 5150 / 4GB / Corsair Force 3 240GB / Silverstone SST-ML05B + ST30SF / Samsung UE60H6200 TV / Windows 10 Pro
Spare/Loaner: Gigabyte EX58-UD5 / i950 / 12GB / HD7870 / Corsair 300R / Silverpower 700W modular
NAS 1: HP N40L / 12GB ECC RAM / 2 x 3TB Arrays || NAS 2: Dell PowerEdge T110 II / 24GB ECC RAM / 2 x 3TB Hybrid arrays || Network:Buffalo WZR-1166DHP w/DD-WRT + HP ProCurve 1800-24G
Laptop: Dell Precision 5510 Printer: HP CP1515n || Phone: Huawei P30 || Other: Samsung Galaxy Tab 4 Pro 10.1 CM14 / Playstation 4 + G29 + 2TB Hybrid drive
From Nvidia :-
Based on our own testing, Electronic Arts' recommendation of a GeForce GTX 970 will give gamers 60 frames per second and above at 1920x1080, with medium detail settings, in the Walker Assault's 40-player battles. Higher detail levels will require more powerful GPUs, such as the GeForce GTX 980 and 980 Ti, as will higher resolutions.
Jon
Vorlon99 (07-10-2015)
Surely these are pre-optimisation specs? No way the recommended specs can be R9 290/GTX 970 level. My rig with a ****ing R9 280X and a Phenom II 955 has ran everything (including Crysis) on just about Ultra so far and you're telling me my PC won't manage this very well? Hmmm..
Having said that, it would be nice if games started pushing the boundaries of hardware limits again because lets face it, there's not many games that bring the mid-high level cards to their knees which kind of renders high-end stuff superfluous.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)