Read more.Is it worth forking out an €82 premium over the identically clocked GTX 970 SC GAMING card?
Read more.Is it worth forking out an €82 premium over the identically clocked GTX 970 SC GAMING card?
According to Jays2cents it is
Seems like overkill? I didn't think the 970 ran particularly warm?
Steam - ReapedYou - Feel free to add me!!
Maybe for some specialist SFF scenarious but on the whole - no
As someone who is considering a low end 970 this just seems pointless with 970 - A 390 maybe as it runs a lot hotter but not the 970. Seems like 'big spoiler on a corsa' scenario to me. More about showing off than giving any advantage.
is this another watercooler that will be sued? :<
So they increased the power consumption(extra fan and pump) and size just to keep it at 40°C? Why?
Pointless useless bling tats, the 'hardcore gamers' will love it !
msi 970 here doing 1550mhz every day at 73 degrees....why do people need this?
And another thing. Why is there a fan already on the card when its being liquid cooled? If AMD can find a way to do it with fury x, it should be a standard. do 970's really run so hot they need both?
i liked watercooler the best sistem
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)