Read more.Wanting to take you away from GeForce lovin'.
Read more.Wanting to take you away from GeForce lovin'.
after a series of driver updates the 4GB memory in the Fury line of cards is more than enough! I wonder if they had 6GB just like the 980Ti....To Be Continued
AMD + Sapphire? Ew. I'll stick to the G1 980Ti
How long have Sapphire offered a three year warranty for? I seem to remember them only having a two-year warranty in the past?
Edit: jumped too soon, seen 390x in some of the benchmarks. nvm my comment haha
Last edited by ValkyrieTsukiko; 29-01-2016 at 05:28 PM. Reason: missed something
Until AMD and/or Nvidia get around to releasing a graphics card that can run something like the Witcher 3 at 4k at a decent frame rate and high settings at a decent frame rate, I will be only too happy to wait, until then my R9 290X will have to hold the fort.
At launch the performance was not that much faster than the GTX980 and now it's close enough to the X and Ti to not matter. This is pritty impressive for the Fury. The GTX980 looks very overpriced and lacking in features now.
Dumping ~250w of heat takes a certain volume of fins, there's not much that can be done about that - so if they made the cooler only as long as the card then either it'd have to be insanely thick or they'd have to lower the clocks of the card to take less power (and call it the fury nano ). Extending the pcb would add to the cost for little point, since fury takes up so little space on the card, and it probably helps with the cooling - the fins on the end will be cooling more efficiently since there's no pcb impeding air motion through the fins, so there will be more air flowing through that end section.
great card if you just want to keep it for a yr .. hbm 2 comming soon then i'll bite .. need a gpu to last 3 yrs then they go into the wifes pc ..
What does it matter now if men believe or no?
What is to come will come. And soon you too will stand aside,
To murmur in pity that my words were true
(Cassandra, in Agamemnon by Aeschylus)
To see the wizard one must look behind the curtain ....
To me the Sapphire Nitro PCB seems cut back on components vs Tri-X (ref PCB)
Nitro: Front Back
Tri-X: Front Back
I have currently 4x Sapphire cards (HD5850 Toxic/Tri-X 290 OC/Vapor-X 290X/ Tri-X Fury), so like the company.
I currently believe the Asus Fury Strix is best PCB a) solid chokes (perhaps no coil whine???) b) 12 phase VRM, even if don't push card more phases = load spread more = cooler running, etc. Strix PCB images Front Back
Last edited by gupsterg; 28-02-2016 at 03:19 PM.
i5 4690K @ 4.9GHz CPU@1.255v 4.4GHz Cache@1.10v - Archon SB-E X2 - Asus Maximus VII Ranger
Kingston HyperX Savage 16GB@2400MHz 1T - Sapphire R9 Fury X (1145/545 Custom ROM, ~17.7K 3DM FS)
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB - Cooler Master V850
R7 1700@3.8GHz - Archon IB-E X2 - Asus Crosshair VI Hero - G.Skill Trident Z 3200MHz C14 - Sapphire Fury X (1145/545 Custom ROM, ~17.2K 3DM FS)
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB - Cooler Master V850
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)