Read more.And it will be releasing its first browser for Apple Mac, after 15 years of absence.
Read more.And it will be releasing its first browser for Apple Mac, after 15 years of absence.
...Mozilla engine could be a better option. Google will dominate.
Given the bad history between Netscape and Microsoft, I can't see them ever adopting the Gecko engine, which is a shame.
Still, all the more reason to use Firefox.
Embrace, extend, and extinguish.
I think this is an excellent move - with Microsoft contributing to the Open Source project that is Chromium, we may see further leaps in development which may really help optimise the browsers for efficiency.
XBOX Live - Sheep Sardine | Origin - MrRockliffe | Steam - MrRockliffe |
Add me
Well... I'd rather see them work with Mozilla but I suppose this does mean I don't need to install chrome (yes I know I could just get chromium) just check if a website works....
Having said that, half the problem is that websites are now being designed to take into account chrome only features (google earth for example ONLY works in chrome browser, yes I know it's a google property) which are not web standards.... got to love web devs who moaned like crazy about ie6 having it's own browser specific code and now we're seeing them using the same 'browser specific' code they hated so much for another browser, basically because it's from Google...
Last edited by LSG501; 07-12-2018 at 02:42 PM.
I thought this was more down to Google proposing a standard to W3, implementing it early in Chromium and then using it almost immediately rather than Microsoft 'custom' web (activeX ). Not perfect but at least others can implement and benefit from the new standards rather than just hijacking. Only risk is Google are increasingly writing the web standards however someone has too - The standards did get stale for a while.
Some of it might be that but there's also some code that dev's are tapping into that only works on Chrome from what I've read.
Luckily, at least on the sites I browse, I haven't seen anything that won't work well on firefox, although the 'new' google maps was a little lacking in features when it first came out unless I used chrome...
It seems like almost everyone seems to think that the only way to get a share of the popular browser pie is to follow Chrome's lead (as Firefox did) or become a Chromium rebrand, despite plenty of perfectly good technology being left behind as a result.
It seems that soon the only ones actually using a different technology will be the smaller independent browser makers, such as Pale Moon and others built on UXP (Unified XUL Platform).
Wow, has it really been 15 years since IE for OSX? Sheesh.....
I was wondering why I hadn't seen anyone use it in years
Main PC: Asus Rampage IV Extreme / 3960X@4.5GHz / Antec H1200 Pro / 32GB DDR3-1866 Quad Channel / Sapphire Fury X / Areca 1680 / 850W EVGA SuperNOVA Gold 2 / Corsair 600T / 2x Dell 3007 / 4 x 250GB SSD + 2 x 80GB SSD / 4 x 1TB HDD (RAID 10) / Windows 10 Pro, Yosemite & Ubuntu
HTPC: AsRock Z77 Pro 4 / 3770K@4.2GHz / 24GB / GTX 1080 / SST-LC20 / Antec TP-550 / Hisense 65k5510 4K TV / HTC Vive / 2 x 240GB SSD + 12TB HDD Space / Race Seat / Logitech G29 / Win 10 Pro
HTPC2: Asus AM1I-A / 5150 / 4GB / Corsair Force 3 240GB / Silverstone SST-ML05B + ST30SF / Samsung UE60H6200 TV / Windows 10 Pro
Spare/Loaner: Gigabyte EX58-UD5 / i950 / 12GB / HD7870 / Corsair 300R / Silverpower 700W modular
NAS 1: HP N40L / 12GB ECC RAM / 2 x 3TB Arrays || NAS 2: Dell PowerEdge T110 II / 24GB ECC RAM / 2 x 3TB Hybrid arrays || Network:Buffalo WZR-1166DHP w/DD-WRT + HP ProCurve 1800-24G
Laptop: Dell Precision 5510 Printer: HP CP1515n || Phone: Huawei P30 || Other: Samsung Galaxy Tab 4 Pro 10.1 CM14 / Playstation 4 + G29 + 2TB Hybrid drive
It will also have the chromiums ram management issues?
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)