Read more.Removing the Blu-ray drive could slash the console price by a third.
Read more.Removing the Blu-ray drive could slash the console price by a third.
This would be me sorted, a machine just for Rare games. Sign me up, Just got too many consoles atm -_-
So, it is not disc-less, as it still have hard disk, just not optical disc (very expensive one though).
I watch BluRay rarely, but it is my only BR player.And I would say, the best one.
But, I assume 80% of the users do not use it, so why pay for something you do not use?
The more you live, less you die. More you play, more you die. Isn't it great.
Isn't a better idea to launch a disc-less One-X at the price of the S? If they are driving people to digital, surely that's a better way?
As someone who loves browsing used games stores and finding a hidden gem this is a sad day. Sure you can search the MS store / PSN / steam etc. but it just isn't quite the same. Also you can forget ever getting anything back for those games you've completed and will probably never play again.
I only bought one for the 4k bluray capability, as it was just as cheap as buying a stand alone player at the time (£179 for an S with 4 games), so not having that would mean I wouldn't have bought one.
I agree that this is sad, but it's inevitable. Digital content is where the tech is headed with no looking back. I would like them to eliminate the internal drive and just have it be streamed in some manner. I played Googles Project Stream with Assassin's Creed Odyssey, and it played very well on both my high-end gaming PC and my low-end laptop. I have read things about MS looking to do this as well so I am excited to see where this tech. will go.
Given all of this, I am embracing the idea of making consoles cheaper. I am a PC gamer that would only buy a console for a handful of exclusive titles. I have yet to buy into this generation (Xbox One, PS4, Switch) because it's hard to justify $300 for two to three games; let alone the need to buy more controllers, for $50+ each, to enjoy with friends and family.
This is to kill the second hand game market which they despise.
No this machine is basically meant for Minecraft/Roblox/Fortnite/Lego games as thats all kids play these days, for those games you do not need discs.
So cheapest price point for parents makes sense, same goes for casual buyers who will only buy one or two games thats it.
Disc's remain relevant to the premium market so removing discs from XB1X model would be a bad move.
My guess is yes. But not me.Originally Posted by Article
While I guess licence-only diskless games don't necessarily mean you can't transfer/sell games, as it all depends on what rights the lucence grants, my bet is that the specific licences will not. I mean, I do have some software that has no physical media, but yhe licence grants the right to transfer/sell the licence, but with similar conditions to when you have physical media, which is that all copies are transferred/deleted and any/all installed versions completely removed.
But I like physical copies. Always have, always will.
Besides, one of my gaming red lines is that I can install and play without any form of online validation after the initial install check, not least because I take hardware with me when I go away for protracted periods and when I do, there simply isn't a net connection ar all. That's half the point of going.
So no doubt it'll suit some users, but not me.
Last edited by Saracen999; 07-03-2019 at 02:04 AM.
There are definite benefits to having games on discs. Most notably the ability to sell your games on when you no longer play them and get some of the cost back, something you cannot do with digital.
Jon
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)