Results 1 to 14 of 14

Thread: Activist shareholder asks Intel to get rid of failed acquisitions

  1. #1
    HEXUS.admin
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    31,709
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    2,073 times in 719 posts

    Activist shareholder asks Intel to get rid of failed acquisitions

    And in other Intel news the firm reveals research into stacked nanosheet transistors.
    Read more.

  2. #2
    Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Location
    Helion Prime
    Posts
    152
    Thanks
    2
    Thanked
    6 times in 6 posts
    • fend_oblivion's system
      • Motherboard:
      • ASUS M5A78L-M/USB3
      • CPU:
      • AMD FX 4100 3.6 GHz Black Edition
      • Memory:
      • G.Skill RipJawsX 8 GB DDR3 @ 1600 MHz
      • Storage:
      • Western Digital Blue 1 TB
      • PSU:
      • Seasonic S1211 520 W
      • Case:
      • Cooler Master K380
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 7 Ultimate Edition 64-bit
      • Monitor(s):
      • Acer P166HQL

    Re: Activist shareholder asks Intel to get rid of failed acquisitions

    Intel has been having a bad time ever since AMD came up with Ryzen and Threadripper to be fair.

  3. #3
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Posts
    254
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    16 times in 14 posts

    Re: Activist shareholder asks Intel to get rid of failed acquisitions

    Failed acquisitions....... Better start with the management board first.

  4. #4
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2016
    Posts
    772
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    9 times in 9 posts

    Re: Activist shareholder asks Intel to get rid of failed acquisitions

    Kill off the suites... good start.

  5. #5
    RIP Peterb ik9000's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Posts
    7,741
    Thanks
    1,849
    Thanked
    1,442 times in 1,065 posts
    • ik9000's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Asus P7H55-M/USB3
      • CPU:
      • i7-870, Prolimatech Megahalems, 2x Akasa Apache 120mm
      • Memory:
      • 4x4GB Corsair Vengeance 2133 11-11-11-27
      • Storage:
      • 2x256GB Samsung 840-Pro, 1TB Seagate 7200.12, 1TB Seagate ES.2
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Gigabyte GTX 460 1GB SuperOverClocked
      • PSU:
      • NZXT Hale 90 750w
      • Case:
      • BitFenix Survivor + Bitfenix spectre LED fans, LG BluRay R/W optical drive
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 7 Professional
      • Monitor(s):
      • Dell U2414h, U2311h 1920x1080
      • Internet:
      • 200Mb/s Fibre and 4G wifi

    Re: Activist shareholder asks Intel to get rid of failed acquisitions

    Quote Originally Posted by QuorTek View Post
    Kill off the suites... good start.
    do you mean suits?

  6. Received thanks from:

    Sumanji (30-12-2020)

  7. #6
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    Wonderful Warwick!
    Posts
    3,919
    Thanks
    4
    Thanked
    183 times in 153 posts

    Re: Activist shareholder asks Intel to get rid of failed acquisitions

    Quote Originally Posted by ik9000 View Post
    do you mean suits?
    Obvs buying DFS was their downfall...
    Old puter - still good enuff till I save some pennies!

  8. Received thanks from:

    Sumanji (30-12-2020),Ttaskmaster (05-01-2021)

  9. #7
    Registered+
    Join Date
    Jun 2020
    Posts
    34
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    1 time in 1 post

    Re: Activist shareholder asks Intel to get rid of failed acquisitions

    Swan has sold off the smartphone modem business, replaced the Nervana NNP chips with Habana's versions, sold off the NAND and SSD product lines (except Optane products). I don't see Swan as having some fault of carrying products that are losing money. Seems like a bogus accusation, if that's what the hedge fund is claiming.

    Intel has 4 yrs of new record revenues under Swan, including the projected $75B for 2020.

    Swan also responded well to the capacity crunch, increasing capacity by 25% in 2019 and again in 2020.

    They have competition, but that was expected.
    They have pretty amazing 10sf and 10esf processing upgrades and are shipping 3D fabricated Lakefield chips before the competition.

  10. #8
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    Wonderful Warwick!
    Posts
    3,919
    Thanks
    4
    Thanked
    183 times in 153 posts

    Re: Activist shareholder asks Intel to get rid of failed acquisitions

    Quote Originally Posted by JayN View Post
    Swan has sold off the smartphone modem business, replaced the Nervana NNP chips with Habana's versions, sold off the NAND and SSD product lines (except Optane products). I don't see Swan as having some fault of carrying products that are losing money. Seems like a bogus accusation, if that's what the hedge fund is claiming.

    Intel has 4 yrs of new record revenues under Swan, including the projected $75B for 2020.

    Swan also responded well to the capacity crunch, increasing capacity by 25% in 2019 and again in 2020.

    They have competition, but that was expected.
    They have pretty amazing 10sf and 10esf processing upgrades and are shipping 3D fabricated Lakefield chips before the competition.
    10sf and 10esf that are delayed. Again? And 7nm that is delayed. Again.

    But it's ok cos we backported 10nm designs to 14nm++++++++++ so don't worry people
    Old puter - still good enuff till I save some pennies!

  11. #9
    RIP Peterb ik9000's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Posts
    7,741
    Thanks
    1,849
    Thanked
    1,442 times in 1,065 posts
    • ik9000's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Asus P7H55-M/USB3
      • CPU:
      • i7-870, Prolimatech Megahalems, 2x Akasa Apache 120mm
      • Memory:
      • 4x4GB Corsair Vengeance 2133 11-11-11-27
      • Storage:
      • 2x256GB Samsung 840-Pro, 1TB Seagate 7200.12, 1TB Seagate ES.2
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Gigabyte GTX 460 1GB SuperOverClocked
      • PSU:
      • NZXT Hale 90 750w
      • Case:
      • BitFenix Survivor + Bitfenix spectre LED fans, LG BluRay R/W optical drive
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 7 Professional
      • Monitor(s):
      • Dell U2414h, U2311h 1920x1080
      • Internet:
      • 200Mb/s Fibre and 4G wifi

    Re: Activist shareholder asks Intel to get rid of failed acquisitions

    Quote Originally Posted by JayN View Post
    Swan has sold off the smartphone modem business, replaced the Nervana NNP chips with Habana's versions, sold off the NAND and SSD product lines (except Optane products). I don't see Swan as having some fault of carrying products that are losing money. Seems like a bogus accusation, if that's what the hedge fund is claiming.

    Intel has 4 yrs of new record revenues under Swan, including the projected $75B for 2020.

    Swan also responded well to the capacity crunch, increasing capacity by 25% in 2019 and again in 2020.

    They have competition, but that was expected.
    They have pretty amazing 10sf and 10esf processing upgrades and are shipping 3D fabricated Lakefield chips before the competition.
    Ah the intel fan boy is back again. You still haven't answered the question JayN. Are you in any way paid by, affiliated to, invested in, or receiving any payment/profit/benefit from Intel? It's a really simply question. Much simpler than them trying to shoehorn yet another chip design into 14nm++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

    Quote Originally Posted by 3dcandy View Post
    10sf and 10esf that are delayed. Again? And 7nm that is delayed. Again.

    But it's ok cos we backported 10nm designs to 14nm++++++++++ so don't worry people
    He does this in other threads too. I wouldn't worry too much about trying to debate with JayN, they only seem interested in pro-Intel propaganda. It's almost like they're paid by them or something. Hence the question above (as asked, and not answered, in other threads several times already)

  12. #10
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Location
    ATLANTIS
    Posts
    1,207
    Thanks
    1
    Thanked
    28 times in 26 posts

    Re: Activist shareholder asks Intel to get rid of failed acquisitions

    This is the MAJOR problem of the USA stock exchange. FAKE regulators and CEOs simply over-value a company and the LIES fly all over the planet but inside is the lack of innovation, corruption and intellectual theft. I am glad to see Asian companies taking the crown.

  13. #11
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    Wonderful Warwick!
    Posts
    3,919
    Thanks
    4
    Thanked
    183 times in 153 posts

    Re: Activist shareholder asks Intel to get rid of failed acquisitions

    Quote Originally Posted by ik9000 View Post
    Ah the intel fan boy is back again. You still haven't answered the question JayN. Are you in any way paid by, affiliated to, invested in, or receiving any payment/profit/benefit from Intel? It's a really simply question. Much simpler than them trying to shoehorn yet another chip design into 14nm++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

    He does this in other threads too. I wouldn't worry too much about trying to debate with JayN, they only seem interested in pro-Intel propaganda. It's almost like they're paid by them or something. Hence the question above (as asked, and not answered, in other threads several times already)
    no debate - he won't answer so it just makes him look an ass
    Old puter - still good enuff till I save some pennies!

  14. #12
    Registered+
    Join Date
    Aug 2018
    Posts
    36
    Thanks
    1
    Thanked
    0 times in 0 posts

    Re: Activist shareholder asks Intel to get rid of failed acquisitions

    Years of dominance in a market place with little competition and then all of a sudden they start to sell up. Seems like they should concentrate on developing the products better and worry less about shareholders!

  15. #13
    Senior Member Xlucine's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Posts
    2,162
    Thanks
    298
    Thanked
    188 times in 147 posts
    • Xlucine's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Asus prime B650M-A II
      • CPU:
      • 7900
      • Memory:
      • 32GB @ 4.8 Gt/s (don't want to wait for memory training)
      • Storage:
      • Crucial P5+ 2TB (boot), Crucial P5 1TB, Crucial MX500 1TB, Crucial MX100 512GB
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Asus Dual 4070 w/ shroud mod
      • PSU:
      • Fractal Design ION+ 560P
      • Case:
      • Silverstone TJ08-E
      • Operating System:
      • W10 pro
      • Monitor(s):
      • Viewsonic vx3211-2k-mhd, Dell P2414H
      • Internet:
      • Gigabit symmetrical

    Re: Activist shareholder asks Intel to get rid of failed acquisitions

    Quote Originally Posted by JayN View Post
    Swan has sold off the smartphone modem business, replaced the Nervana NNP chips with Habana's versions, sold off the NAND and SSD product lines (except Optane products). I don't see Swan as having some fault of carrying products that are losing money. Seems like a bogus accusation, if that's what the hedge fund is claiming.

    Intel has 4 yrs of new record revenues under Swan, including the projected $75B for 2020.

    Swan also responded well to the capacity crunch, increasing capacity by 25% in 2019 and again in 2020.

    They have competition, but that was expected.
    They have pretty amazing 10sf and 10esf processing upgrades and are shipping 3D fabricated Lakefield chips before the competition.
    Innovative groundbreaking manufacturing process! Ignore the dire performance and huge cost, those are secondary considerations. There's what, 2 lakefield design wins? One has an objectively better version with a snapdragon chip in the same chassis, the other is a folding tech demo (which does look neat, but not £2k neat)

  16. #14
    Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2018
    Posts
    113
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    1 time in 1 post

    Re: Activist shareholder asks Intel to get rid of failed acquisitions

    "Sell before it's too late", told you.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •