Read more.Can a £1,100 gaming laptop deliver the requisite thrills?
Read more.Can a £1,100 gaming laptop deliver the requisite thrills?
What's the point in reviewing a gaming laptop, without benchmarking any games?
Crazy loud, poor battery, sub-par screen. It's easy to see where the corners have been cut.
Edit: Given the benchmark suite listed on the second page (where games are listed), I assume you've mucked up the page order or something and managed to accidently omit them?
We're transitioning to a new gaming suite and have thus benchmarked this in isolation. The bottom of page four has the pertinent details:
'It is in the gaming department that things get interesting, with 3DMark Time Spy suggesting that the 75W RTX 3060 isn't a million miles away from an 80W RTX 3070. How does the synthetic score translate to real-world gaming? We're in the midst of migrating to a new suite of games and have a few titles in contention.
DIRT 5 averages 61fps using the high-quality preset with raytraced shadows enabled. F1 2020 is silky smooth at 100fps with everything cranked to maximum, Final Fantasy XIV: Shadowbringers (cross-comparable with older results) returns 113fps via the maximum preset, and Gears Tactics, with ultra-quality settings, is able to hit an average of 89fps. There's enough power here to ensure in excess of 60fps in all the tested titles, but a higher-power RTX 3060 would be preferable to make the most of the 144Hz display.'
cptwhite_uk (12-05-2021),Pleiades (13-05-2021)
Thanks for the clarification, hadn't spotted that
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)