Results 1 to 11 of 11

Thread: HEXUS.beans :: DELL assaults the little guys

  1. #1
    HEXUS webmaster Steve's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Posts
    14,283
    Thanks
    293
    Thanked
    841 times in 476 posts

    HEXUS.beans :: DELL assaults the little guys

    Whilst in Old Taipei back in June, HEXUS learnt a lot of secret stuff, and one of the more interesting beans we collected was that DELL had apparently been requesting its suppliers to submit, for technical evaluation, a broad range of mainboards supporting AMD processors.
    http://www.hexus.net/content/item.php?item=6469
    PHP Code:
    $s = new signature();
    $s->sarcasm()->intellect()->font('Courier New')->display(); 

  2. #2
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    United Kingdom
    Posts
    367
    Thanks
    7
    Thanked
    0 times in 0 posts
    I really don't see why they need to do this at this time time; with Core 2 architecture being everyone's favourite for desktop (and soon, laptops), what is the point of breaking their relationship with Intel? I could understand a good few months back when AMD seemed to be king, but this seems a bad choice now.

  3. #3
    Sublime HEXUS.net
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    The Void.. Floating
    Posts
    11,819
    Thanks
    213
    Thanked
    233 times in 160 posts
    • Stoo's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Mac Pro
      • CPU:
      • 2*Xeon 5450 @ 2.8GHz, 12MB Cache
      • Memory:
      • 32GB 1600MHz FBDIMM
      • Storage:
      • ~ 2.5TB + 4TB external array
      • Graphics card(s):
      • ATI Radeon HD 4870
      • Case:
      • Mac Pro
      • Operating System:
      • OS X 10.7
      • Monitor(s):
      • 24" Samsung 244T Black
      • Internet:
      • Zen Max Pro
    They're not breaking their relationship with intel, they're adding AMD based machines to the inventory.

    All they've done is broaden the product range.
    (\__/)
    (='.'=)
    (")_(")

  4. #4
    Banhammer in peace PeterB kalniel's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    31,035
    Thanks
    1,876
    Thanked
    3,378 times in 2,715 posts
    • kalniel's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Gigabyte Z390 Aorus Ultra
      • CPU:
      • Intel i9 9900k
      • Memory:
      • 32GB DDR4 3200 CL16
      • Storage:
      • 1TB Samsung 970Evo+ NVMe
      • Graphics card(s):
      • nVidia GTX 1060 6GB
      • PSU:
      • Seasonic 600W
      • Case:
      • Cooler Master HAF 912
      • Operating System:
      • Win 10 Pro x64
      • Monitor(s):
      • Dell S2721DGF
      • Internet:
      • rubbish
    Quote Originally Posted by hexus
    We'd also argue that Dell's competitors need to play on their potential strengths, these being dynamism and speed to market,
    Dynamism, maybe. But you've got to be careful with speed to market when Dell often manage to start stockpiling parts before they're released in the mainstream.

    Quote Originally Posted by hexus
    In our view those PC companies which have already committed to putting their customer care and technical support in full view of the buying public should be trusted the most.
    Hexus would say that though, wouldn't they? Dell support forums have been online for ages - I don't know if you need to be a dell owner to access them, but I must admit I've been very impressed with Dells support - though that was based on experiences now a few years old.

    In my opinion what the competitors need to do is offer differentiation - the one thing Dells can never be, by definition, is unique. Offer the customer the chance to feel different, to feel that the system is tailored to their use, not a generic average user x100,000. But I've still yet to see that done well. How cool would it be to actually have honest, clear advice on what you do.. and more importantly, what you don't need for a system to do what you want it to do?

    edit: no you don't need to own a dell to view their forums:

    http://forums.us.dell.com/supportforums/
    Last edited by kalniel; 14-08-2006 at 01:44 PM.

  5. #5
    radix lecti dave87's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    England
    Posts
    12,806
    Thanks
    657
    Thanked
    931 times in 634 posts
    • dave87's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Asus
      • CPU:
      • i5 3470k under Corsair H80 WC
      • Memory:
      • 8gb DDR3
      • Storage:
      • 240gb SSD + 120gb SSD
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Asus HD7950
      • PSU:
      • XFX 600w Modular
      • Case:
      • Lian Li PC-A05FNB + Acoustipack
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 10 Pro
      • Monitor(s):
      • 2x Dell S2309W (1920x1080)
      • Internet:
      • BT Infinity Option 2
    Quote Originally Posted by Stoo
    They're not breaking their relationship with intel, they're adding AMD based machines to the inventory.

    All they've done is broaden the product range.

    Isn't that likely to damage their relationship with intel, resulting in higher prices for intel chips?

  6. #6
    Banhammer in peace PeterB kalniel's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    31,035
    Thanks
    1,876
    Thanked
    3,378 times in 2,715 posts
    • kalniel's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Gigabyte Z390 Aorus Ultra
      • CPU:
      • Intel i9 9900k
      • Memory:
      • 32GB DDR4 3200 CL16
      • Storage:
      • 1TB Samsung 970Evo+ NVMe
      • Graphics card(s):
      • nVidia GTX 1060 6GB
      • PSU:
      • Seasonic 600W
      • Case:
      • Cooler Master HAF 912
      • Operating System:
      • Win 10 Pro x64
      • Monitor(s):
      • Dell S2721DGF
      • Internet:
      • rubbish
    If it does, then Intel will be found in breach of anti-competitive laws and will get sued by AMD. Sort of like a certain current lawsuit that's in the works...

  7. #7
    Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Posts
    173
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    0 times in 0 posts
    about time tbh i actually thought they should have done it a lot earlier but meh, i guess annoying intel is a bad idea

  8. #8
    Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    A planet
    Posts
    77
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    0 times in 0 posts
    • DeathByDuke's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Gigabyte 970A-DS3P AM3+ AMD SB910/950 Chipset
      • CPU:
      • AMD FX-8320 8 Core "Vishera" Core Socket AM3+ CPU
      • Memory:
      • Corsair TWINX 8Gb DDR3-800 (2X 4Gb) CAS6
      • Storage:
      • 1x EVO 840 120Gb, 2x Samsung 1Tb, 1x Seagate 2Tb, 1x Samsung 750Gb
      • Graphics card(s):
      • MSi AMD Radeon R9 270 2Gb
      • PSU:
      • Thermaltake 680W
      • Case:
      • Antec Sonata 3
      • Operating System:
      • Microsoft Windows 10 Pro x64
      • Monitor(s):
      • DELL U2414H
      • Internet:
      • BT Infinity 2 Unlimited
    this is only happening cos of the lawsuit, if other countries hadn't started their own investigations against Intels alleged monopoly abuse, its possible Dell would stay Intel only. Intel have obviously cut off all the infringing 'deals' to avoid being caught red handed.

    I bet that was the plan of AMD in the first place. Scare Intel into letting them get a bigger foothold in PC makes. And its working. And its benefiting all of us

  9. #9
    Senior Member Rack's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    LonDon
    Posts
    775
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    0 times in 0 posts
    about time someone scared Intel too - though I doubt they are shaking in their boots. It's just good to see some competition in that sector.

  10. #10
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Posts
    251
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    6 times in 6 posts
    This will sound pretty negative but, I dont think this is good news for AMD.

    It annoys intel and stimulates competition, great. Will it annoy intel to the point where they have no option but to destroy the new AMD/ATI partnership, I think so.

    Whether you think the ATI merger was a good thing for AMD products or not isnt really relevent (I personally think it would have been a good thing but thats another thread) the financial position of AMD is considerably weaker now than it was three months ago. Intel knows that now is the time to go in for the kill as for the next twelve months AMD/ATI's restructuring will mean inefficiency for both AMD and ATI.

    Intel is in a position now to ally itself with Nvidia, Serverworks, Broadcom and even VIA (whos biggest market is AMD chipsets and AMD bought ATI to help develop what?) in order to gain a advantage. Thanks to its massive (in comparison to AMD) financial reserves Intel can get these companies onboard (and I think will) to develop, quite frankly a kick-ass CPU, chipset and anything else they wish that will put AMD products into the shadows.

    This might look good on the surface but everytime AMD gets a little victory like this its just like poking a giant - one day it will react and crush you, if intel are smart then they are about to awaken.

    Just my .02

  11. #11
    I spammed for classifieds access
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    80
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    0 times in 0 posts
    ye, there is a huge amd following that dell seem to think they are missing out on.

    i agree

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 37
    Last Post: 29-06-2005, 03:39 PM
  2. Replies: 1
    Last Post: 04-06-2005, 10:25 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •