Much more recent for me: the LG 8120 from three. It just goddamn refused to do its job: make phone calls. Rubbish
Printable View
Much more recent for me: the LG 8120 from three. It just goddamn refused to do its job: make phone calls. Rubbish
Motorola!
...oh and NEC's suck might buttocks too
The v60i, had a v60, which rocked, and the text input is fantastic whatever anyone says, then got a v60i as upgrade, which was pap, basically same phone, java functionality was completely pointless cos of slow processor, screen was pap, and i managed to break the aerial off 3 times in a year just with it in my pocket. Then my v600 was ace, and now im tempted by a v6, but im loving windows smartphones too much at the moment, solitare in lectures rocks
probably the motorola A835 when 3 had really cheap deals going. Huge for a "modern" phone, utterly useless battery (light-moderate useage meant it was dead before the end of the day) and crashed a fair bit. Ugly too. :)
p.s. Have to say I like my Moto Razr V3 :P
Motorola Razr V3 Black. It was ugly, sluggish, Jammed up, the battery lasted 1 day, It didn't have a video camera, the buttons were awful to use.. I gave it up for a Nokia, and after it I wish I'd never left them in the first place
I agree with Swafe - T610
very slow - mine kept crashing. And everyone had one, they did not encourage phone envy....
Nokia 3220, 6230 and other similar phones.
Mainly due to the hard-to-use enter key (which also double as left, right, up and down keys.) Which takes some getting use to.
it's not too bad once you adjust to it, and it cause me any grief.Quote:
Originally Posted by Workaholic
*Doesn't cause me any griefQuote:
Originally Posted by mhs.internet
Sorry about the double post, but for some reason the edit button isn't working at the moment
Another bad phone:
Nokia 7600.
Where the h*** are the buttons split across both sides of the screen. It takes less time writing a letter then typing a text.
I really wanted one of them actually. I always thought they looked really cool. And once again it'd be something you'd get used to.Quote:
Originally Posted by Workaholic
I've grown to love mine, I only used it cos I got it for free and needed a 3 phone to use my free '3' minutes on, anyway, it beat the pants off the NEC range.Quote:
Originally Posted by Workaholic
Once your used to the keypad, its great, I remember when amazon was selling these (And the CPW) for 30 quid a go, taking into account this was 18 months ago and it had a superb quality VGA camera, Video recorded for 50 minutes and had proper bluetooth it was a real bargain, still now, 18 months later I doubt even on ebay they'd sell for as low as 30 quid great features for the money.
Defo a winner in my book, value, style, and something different, shame it took me a few months to get to grips with, but now I can knock a txt out mega style :D
However for its price it is a fairly good phone, includes the data cable so saving over £20. However the so called carry case is only a "clothe bag."Quote:
Originally Posted by Swafe
Bosch 509. Only had it about 2 days before switching to Nokia 702
8210 for me. it worked fine, until the screen broke, then you'd have to get it repaired, until it broke again
mine broke 8 times in a year. talk about design flaw.
(edit : nokia 8210..)
I'd have to say the sharp gx10 is the worst phone i have used. It just wouldn't let you do anything, you couldn't add ringtones, wallpapers, or anything plus the wireles and teh gps only worked when it suited them.
I now have a lg 8210 and i really like it. Can't say that i have come accross any of the problems mentioned earlier.