Results 1 to 5 of 5

Thread: ntfs corruption with linux?

  1. #1
    Senior Member SilentDeath's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Posts
    4,745
    Thanks
    38
    Thanked
    16 times in 11 posts

    ntfs corruption with linux?

    Hi,
    Im using openSUSE 11.1 on two pc's and had some strange problems over the last few days. these are fresh installs, and Im supprised to be having disk problems rather than drivers, which went 100% perfectly (including ati 8.5 drivers )

    So my vista install boots ok in safemode. I can set chkdsk and it will reboot in normal mode and have no problems getting to chkdsk, so it gets atleast that far..

    BUT If I try to boot normally, it bluescreens with "ntfs.sys" "page fault in non paged area". So I assume its not the ntfs.sys file, as that is used in safemode.

    I think some structure on the disk maybe wrong and making it crash? but chkdsk has no errors on a full scan

    I notice dolphin has wrote ".dolphin" files everywhere with folder settings etc... but that shouldnt annoy windows?

    Also a second thing (fixed) is the win2k bootsector got corrupted on the other pc, when installing grub ** to /boot partition on the other disk**. Putting grub on twice fixed though

    Thanks
    Mark
    Last edited by SilentDeath; 15-05-2009 at 12:21 AM.

  2. #2
    Senior Member SilentDeath's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Posts
    4,745
    Thanks
    38
    Thanked
    16 times in 11 posts

    Re: ntfs corruption with linux?

    Vista will now boot but not repeatedly. It will always bluescreen if the previous boot was not linux.


    this is crazy, any ideas?

    they are on seperate disks! the two partitions on the vista drive are mounted read only.

  3. #3
    The late but legendary peterb - Onward and Upward peterb's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Looking down & checking on swearing
    Posts
    19,378
    Thanks
    2,892
    Thanked
    3,403 times in 2,693 posts

    Re: ntfs corruption with linux?

    But there is still a common boot sector, and I guess you re using Grub as your boot loader. However I am at a loss to explain it as (AFAIK) nothing in the boot process writes to those areas of the disk so there shouldn't be any remnants from the previous boot left behind - at least not there.
    (\__/)
    (='.'=)
    (")_(")

    Been helped or just 'Like' a post? Use the Thanks button!
    My broadband speed - 750 Meganibbles/minute

  4. #4
    Comfortably Numb directhex's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    /dev/urandom
    Posts
    17,074
    Thanks
    228
    Thanked
    1,027 times in 678 posts
    • directhex's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Asus ROG Strix B550-I Gaming
      • CPU:
      • Ryzen 5900x
      • Memory:
      • 64GB G.Skill Trident Z RGB
      • Storage:
      • 2TB Seagate Firecuda 520
      • Graphics card(s):
      • EVGA GeForce RTX 3080 XC3 Ultra
      • PSU:
      • EVGA SuperNOVA 850W G3
      • Case:
      • NZXT H210i
      • Operating System:
      • Ubuntu 20.04, Windows 10
      • Monitor(s):
      • LG 34GN850
      • Internet:
      • FIOS

    Re: ntfs corruption with linux?

    Do you have BitLocker installed?

  5. #5
    Senior Member SilentDeath's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Posts
    4,745
    Thanks
    38
    Thanked
    16 times in 11 posts

    Re: ntfs corruption with linux?

    Nope I dont have Bitlocker or any encryption. Theres no common bootsector

    Heres my fstab
    Code:
    UUID=                swap                 swap       defaults              0 0
    UUID=464de31d-fb79-462c-bc92-2314f35ef487 /                    ext3       acl,user_xattr        1 1
    UUID=ec749a30-1fbc-4f3f-9e44-51872afad55c /boot                ext3       acl,user_xattr        1 2
    proc                 /proc                proc       defaults              0 0
    sysfs                /sys                 sysfs      noauto                0 0
    debugfs              /sys/kernel/debug    debugfs    noauto                0 0
    devpts               /dev/pts             devpts     mode=0620,gid=5       0 0
    /dev/disk/by-id/ata-Maxtor_6B200M0_B41CAX4H-part1 /home/kram/S200-2                ntfs-3g    ro,uid=1000,gid=100,umask=0007,locale=en_GB.UTF-8 0 0
    /dev/disk/by-id/ata-WDC_WD2500SB-01RFA0_WD-WMANK4358627-part2 /home/kram/IDE0-2    ntfs-3g    ro,uid=1000,gid=100,umask=0007,locale=en_GB.UTF-8 0 0
    /dev/disk/by-id/ata-WDC_WD2500SB-01RFA0_WD-WMANK4358627-part1 /home/kram/IDE0-FAT  vfat       uid=1000,gid=100,umask=0007,utf8=true 0 0
    /dev/disk/by-id/ata-Maxtor_6B250S0_B60RTQWH-part2 /home/kram/S250-Backup           ntfs-3g    ro,uid=1000,gid=100,umask=0007,locale=en_GB.UTF-8 0 0
    /dev/disk/by-id/ata-Maxtor_6B250S0_B60RTQWH-part1 /home/kram/S250-Xp               ntfs-3g    ro,uid=1000,gid=100,umask=0007,locale=en_GB.UTF-8 0 0
    /dev/disk/by-id/ata-Maxtor_6Y160M0_Y41XJYDE-part1 /home/kram/S160-Vista            ntfs-3g    ro,uid=1000,gid=100,umask=0007,locale=en_GB.UTF-8 0 0
    /dev/disk/by-id/ata-Maxtor_6Y160M0_Y41XJYDE-part2 /home/kram/S160-2                ntfs-3g    ro,uid=1000,gid=100,umask=0007,locale=en_GB.UTF-8 0 0
    Vista is on ata-Maxtor_6Y160M. that drive has two partitions (vista/backup) vista is set active and other than a repair done by the vista install cd is the original boot sector/mbr.

    Grub is on ata-Maxtor_6B200M0, with a /boot, swap, ext3 and a ntfs partition. My grub/menu.lst doesn't (yet) have a line for vista.

    I have the vista drive as default in bios, and press ESC and the bios gives me a menu to chose the other disks.


    I really don't understand this. I put linux on a completely separate drive to avoid these issues

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Linux - NTFS writing
    By Raz316 in forum Software
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 17-10-2007, 05:04 PM
  2. Replies: 15
    Last Post: 19-10-2006, 12:33 PM
  3. We heard your feedback on Newegg....
    By DR in forum General Discussion
    Replies: 33
    Last Post: 05-03-2005, 08:13 PM
  4. Replies: 0
    Last Post: 07-03-2004, 03:40 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •