I'm just after a quick opinion from Ye Olde Hexen Hexperts ... which replacement File Manager you prefer. Obviously, to replace the distinctly 3rd rate item that Windows includes. I mean, sure, I'm firmly n the "don't stuff loads of junk into Windows, I'll find my own" camp, ususally, but that's when MS insist on loads'a stuff that isn't really a core component of an OS, but aguably, managing files actually is.
So .... I know what I I'll probably use on this 'ere new (software) setup, and I've been sort-of using it for a while, without major issue. And that is FreeCommander. So far, I've been using the really free, openly available (32-bit) one, and could just continue doing s, but the advantage of "donating" is that you get access to the donor-ony 64-bit version and, of course, supporting the developer that's put loads of time into developing it. And, the publicly available (32-bit) version seems to get updated about once a year (-ish) ad the donor version rather more often.
So before I take the fairly inexpensive plunge and donate, anything good enough to firmly advcate over and above FreeCommander? And why?