Results 1 to 9 of 9

Thread: Windows ME- Which Seti client

  1. #1
    Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    East Yorkshire
    Posts
    53
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    0 times in 0 posts

    Windows ME- Which Seti client

    Does anyone have any experience of comparing the Windows and the command lines verisons of the seti client when using ME, or am I limited to the Windows version?

  2. #2
    cat /dev/null streetster's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    London
    Posts
    4,138
    Thanks
    119
    Thanked
    100 times in 82 posts
    • streetster's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Asus P7P55D-E
      • CPU:
      • Intel i5 750 2.67 @ 4.0Ghz
      • Memory:
      • 4GB Corsair XMS DDR3
      • Storage:
      • 2x1TB Drives [RAID0]
      • Graphics card(s):
      • 2xSapphire HD 4870 512MB CrossFireX
      • PSU:
      • Corsair HX520W
      • Case:
      • Coolermaster Black Widow
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 7 x64
      • Monitor(s):
      • DELL U2311
      • Internet:
      • Virgin 50Mb
    do you mean windows ME? or CE?... i would, personally, use the Command Line version of the client, matched with SetiDriver (have a look on google), as this is what i do, and the CL client gives best performance, and the setiDriver allows me to cache work units, and hide the command line client

    mark

  3. #3
    Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    East Yorkshire
    Posts
    53
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    0 times in 0 posts
    I mean ME. Both clients work but I haven't got the patience to find out which is quicker.

  4. #4
    Senior Member Russ's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Posts
    5,201
    Thanks
    11
    Thanked
    69 times in 44 posts
    you have no patience but u crunch?

  5. #5
    Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    East Yorkshire
    Posts
    53
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    0 times in 0 posts
    I can crunch in my sleep

  6. #6
    Senior Member joshwa's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Sheffield, UK
    Posts
    4,847
    Thanks
    126
    Thanked
    67 times in 62 posts
    • joshwa's system
      • Motherboard:
      • PC Chips M577 AT/ATX
      • CPU:
      • AMD K6-2 500Mhz
      • Memory:
      • 128mb PC100 SDRAM
      • Storage:
      • 8GB Fujitsu
      • Graphics card(s):
      • 3dfx Voodoo 3 3000 AGP (16mb)
      • PSU:
      • ATX 500watt
      • Case:
      • Midi Tower AT
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 98 SE
      • Monitor(s):
      • 22" TFT Widescreen
    the command line version is quicker than the graphical version. about 10% faster apparently.

    i use it with setispy

  7. #7
    HEXUS.social member Agent's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Internet
    Posts
    19,185
    Thanks
    739
    Thanked
    1,614 times in 1,050 posts
    Its a lot more than 10% Josh
    Quote Originally Posted by Saracen View Post
    And by trying to force me to like small pants, they've alienated me.

  8. #8
    Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    East Yorkshire
    Posts
    53
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    0 times in 0 posts
    Okay I have started to use the Command line client now but how can I get it to automatically close when I am closing Windows down?

  9. #9
    HEXUS webmaster Steve's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Posts
    14,283
    Thanks
    293
    Thanked
    841 times in 476 posts
    Seticommander, in my opinion, is the best seti cacher.

    http://seti.hfr.free.fr/seticommande...icmd2.34en.exe

    Comes with all you need.
    PHP Code:
    $s = new signature();
    $s->sarcasm()->intellect()->font('Courier New')->display(); 

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •