Results 1 to 2 of 2

Thread: Supplementary SSD

  1. #1
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Chichester, West Sussex
    Posts
    288
    Thanks
    16
    Thanked
    43 times in 39 posts
    • Skulltrail's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Asus Sabertooth X58
      • CPU:
      • Intel Core i7 920 @ 4.2GHz
      • Memory:
      • 12GB (3x4GB) Mushkin Blackline DDR3-1603 CAS8
      • Storage:
      • 120GB OCZ Agility 3 (Windows & Apps), 60GB OCZ Vertex 2E (VMs), 2x 3TB Seagate Barracuda 7200.14
      • Graphics card(s):
      • 2GB Gigabyte GeForce GTX 670 (3x Windforce fans)
      • PSU:
      • Corsair HX750 (modular)
      • Case:
      • Fractal Design R3
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 7 Ultimate (64-bit) and Windows Server 2008 R2 Enterprise
      • Monitor(s):
      • 24" Dell Ultrasharp U2412M 1920x1200
      • Internet:
      • BT Infinity 76Mbps @ 64Mbps / 17Mbps

    Supplementary SSD

    I've had my OCZ Vertex 2E 60GB for a month or two now, and while very good indeed, it is a tad small in terms of capacity, so I have decided to purchase a second SSD. I have ruled out the Crucial C300 due to my lack of SATAIII (no room for an expansion card), and the Intel 80GB as too expensive (£140 or so max), leaving another 60GB Sandforce or the older Indilinx Barefoot based OCZ Vertex in 96GB form.

    The 96GB Vertex looks very attractive in terms of price to capacity and at the time got very positive reviews, but my question is whether it is still a player?

    My second question is how Sandforce compression friendly are Windows system files and general program files used by Office, Adobe and games? Would it be worth swapping the Windows instillation to the Indilinx drive or keep them on the Sandforce?

    Thanks in advance!

  2. #2
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Posts
    1,731
    Thanks
    230
    Thanked
    151 times in 132 posts
    • Sputnik's system
      • Motherboard:
      • J&W 790GX Extreme
      • CPU:
      • AMD Phenom II 720be
      • Memory:
      • OCZ DDR2-6400
      • PSU:
      • Enermax

    Re: Supplementary SSD

    Well, I would not rule out the Crucial C300 because it works pretty well on SATA2, The price is quite good and if you do change to a SATA3 motherboard in the future you will be able to squeeze that little bit extra read speed from it.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Which PCI Sata Card for an SSD ???
    By Hermann in forum Storage
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 19-09-2011, 11:18 AM
  2. Kingston v+ ssd vs intel x25m g2 ssd
    By howareu in forum Storage
    Replies: 25
    Last Post: 05-07-2010, 08:42 PM
  3. Anyone tried the new SSD "boost" / caching device ?
    By mikerr in forum Help! Quick Relief From Tech Headaches
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 02-03-2010, 02:15 PM
  4. SSD Now or later this year?
    By Ulti in forum Storage
    Replies: 22
    Last Post: 01-03-2010, 09:51 PM
  5. SSD Benefits and Usefullness
    By Champman99 in forum Storage
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 21-10-2009, 04:49 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •