yeah, I must have got the runt of the litter :P
Printable View
yeah, I must have got the runt of the litter :P
http://img839.imageshack.us/img839/5120/ssdcx.png
lol mine is over 2 years old and it's at 80% but is still predicted to last longer than most of yours.......
Firmware 1.5 ? Did you flash it recently ?
@Infinite: Any reason for not upgrading to 1.6?
Harumffff. :(
It doesn\'t recognise SSD\'s in Raid 0.
Booooo!
The Intel drives seem to have less wear for the same number of hours than others it seems!
I don't trust this app's "health" measurement. Seems a bit BS to me. The most interesting part is the number of hours my SSD has been on.
Also according to mine, it's written more data than read which to my logic doesn't make sense. To be honest I don't trust this this at all.
>7000 hours, do I win a prize for leaving my PC on too much?
http://i361.photobucket.com/albums/o...23/SSDLife.png
This software is a load of crap IMHO.
SSD on the 17th after around three weeks of usage.
http://i559.photobucket.com/albums/s...TH/SSDLife.png
SSD tested today.
http://i559.photobucket.com/albums/s.../SSDLife-1.jpg
Indexing and defragmentation are switched off and the page file is on a hard disk.
It says 95% but whats with the bull**** 1 year 10 month value??
If anything if you look at the data values the SSD has had less use since the last time I ran SSDLife.
It really does seem that it comes up with weird lifespan values for OCZ Vertex drives.
Edit!!
This is interesting:
http://www.ocztechnologyforum.com/fo...ly-quot-expect
This is also interesting:
http://ssd-life.com/eng/ssdlife-faq-...questions.html
"I updated the firmware and the drive health fell dramatically. What's the matter?
This problem became widely known after firmware 1.5 for OCZ Vertex, Onyx drives had been released. A lot of users complained that, after they had updated the firmware, the drive health fell dramatically, for example, from 80% to 45%.
The thing is that OCZ decided to revise the maximum number of erasing operations for flash memory and reduced it by 50% from 10 000 to 5 000 (we think they did it just to be on the safe side). And since the reliability and wear of an SSD is calculated depending on these figures, the estimated lifetime in S.M.A.R.T. parameters changed as well. Honestly getting information over from the drive manufacturer to the user, SSDLife just showed this fact :)"
Like I said before, Under firmware 1.10 my drives health was 98% and when I flashed to 1.33 it changed to 100%. It does seem by reading your links that it is firmware dependant.
The only thing I'm not seeing is are the drives being restricted to 5000 erases by the firmware or will it just keep going until the transistor fails?