Originally Posted by
scaryjim
Realistically, you won't notice any real world difference between a fast SSD bottlenecked by a SATAII interface and a fast SSD on SATA3. The sequential figures look impressive on benchmark charts, but it's the much faster random access that really makes a difference compared to mechanical drives, and any SSD will be a massive upgrade. Unless you're planning on upgrading to a SATA3-sporting motherboard soon, *and* you care about e-peen enhancing benchmarks, you may as well stick with a SATAII SSD.
Given that, bought through ebuyer, the Kingston V+100 finally breaks the £1/GB mark, I'd be inclined to go for that. If you're going to fill 96GB then you're going to fill 128GB and you'll need some mechnical storage anyway. The difference in price is not insignificant: you can get the 96GB Kingston + a 1TB mechanical drive for less than any 128GB SSD...