Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 17 to 19 of 19

Thread: Homelab storage upgrade

  1. #17
    Splash
    Guest

    Re: Homelab storage upgrade

    Quote Originally Posted by Moby-Dick View Post
    is the SSD for ZIL and L2ARC?
    ZIL. I actually have another disk that I'd put in for L2ARC, but the 6x2.5" bay I have in the optical bay is full now (4 from the P410, 1 from the SATA and one from the eSATA) and I can't see how I'd squeeze any extra ports out of the server without a fresh build (the other PCI-E slot has an Intel Gb NIC in it) and extra expenditure which the missus would likely murder me for. I was seriously considering the ML110 G6 that _spoon had for sale, but... see previous sentence.

    On re-reading - I considered splitting the SSD into 2 VMDKs, but assumed that the performance hit would be too high - am I wrong on this? Happy to tinker, as it's obviously just a home lab.

  2. #18
    Administrator Moby-Dick's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    There's no place like ::1 (IPv6 version)
    Posts
    10,665
    Thanks
    53
    Thanked
    385 times in 314 posts

    Re: Homelab storage upgrade

    Ah you run your Nexenta as a VM ? I've a colleague who runs is ZFS storage on bare metal - the NIC is his rate limiting step.
    my Virtualisation Blog http://jfvi.co.uk Virtualisation Podcast http://vsoup.net

  3. #19
    Splash
    Guest

    Re: Homelab storage upgrade

    yep, still need the overhead of the extra RAM on the Microserver. Once I can stretch to another NUC I'll go baremetal I think.

    Moved from RDM for ZIL to splitting the disk into 2 VMDKs for ZIL and VMDK (20Gb each, with a little extra for hostcache) and got about 5-6% performance increase.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •