Results 1 to 1 of 1

Thread: SD/CF via ZIF adapter vs. 1.8" ZIF HDD

  1. 23-03-2014, 05:06 PM #1
    Bonebreaker777
    Bonebreaker777 is offline
    Senior Member Bonebreaker777's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Location
    Herts, UK
    Posts
    2,035
    Thanks
    55
    Thanked
    203 times in 186 posts
    • Bonebreaker777's system
      • Motherboard:
      • MSI H97I AC
      • CPU:
      • Xeon 1225 v3 + Freezer 11 L
      • Memory:
      • 2 x 4GB 1600Mhz 1T-8-8-8-20 1.35V Crucial BallistiX Tactical VLP
      • Storage:
      • 128GB CRUCIAL MX100///XPEnology server + 3 x WD Purple 3TB
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Intel HD 4600
      • PSU:
      • be quiet! L8 300W PSU BN220
      • Case:
      • Cooler Master Elite 120
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 10 Pro 64bit
      • Monitor(s):
      • Samsung SyncMaster 226BW
      • Internet:
      • Virgin 100Mb

    SD/CF via ZIF adapter vs. 1.8" ZIF HDD

    I couldn't find any tests or comparisons to see differences between a classical 1.8" HDD (4200RPM) and SD or CF card via adapter.

    Previously was suggested that I/O via cards would be really really bad, but against a classical HDD and 4200RPM at that..?

    Anybody tried? Cause the reason to ask was me having a DELL Latitude D420 and SSD would be a waste but I have a number of big SD and CF cards and the current 60GB 4200RPM is not really fast.

    EDIT: AS SSD, HD Tach and HD Tune results comming.





    P.S.: It couldn't be the CPU holding it back, right?
    Last edited by Bonebreaker777; 23-03-2014 at 09:54 PM.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Forum Rules