Hi all - below is an email I sent to Thecus support on the 15th of November (no response yet - whee)
Short story is that we get really awful network performance out of our N5200 for read operations using windows file copy. Oddly enough write operations are speedy (the reverse of what I would expect). All is well over FTP in both directions so we have determined there is no issue with other network components.
If someone from Thecus support reads this could you reply to my original email please? It's been rather a while and this is our second attempt at getting answers on this issue.
The original email had the config bin attached
-------------------------------------
email to thecus support:
-------------------------------------
We have an N5200 which we're having some issues with. Generally it's well behaved but copying files over the network via the windows file system (ie just dragging files into folders) is really slow.
Copying a single 45MB file from the N5200 to my desktop takes around 60 seconds and gives me approximately 4 to 8% network utilisation (measured by windows task manager). By contrast copying the same 45MB file TO the N52000 (from my desktop) uses more like 80% of my bandwidth and takes around 5 seconds.
If I perform the same operations FTP I get around 10MB/sec in both directions (ie both read and write take around 5 seconds).
I've tried the operation with similar results on several different computers on my network, including:
- windows XP (10/100 nic)
- windows 2000 SBS server (gigabit nic)
Here are the things we've looked at and done to diagnose/fix the problem already:
- checked the RAID array (it's intact and healthy)
- upgraded firmware to the latest one (N5200upgrade.2.00.01.bin)
- enabled and disabled windows firewall (no difference)
- disabled all other applications including antivirus (no difference)
- Copying to and from a windows server on the same network is full speed. The NAS is connected to the same switch as the windows server.
- We've tried swapping the Ethernet cable with the one connected to the fast server (no difference)
We're out of ideas now. Could you tell me if this is a problem that can be fixed?