Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 16 of 21

Thread: Highway Code

  1. #1
    Now with added sobriety Rave's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    SE London
    Posts
    9,948
    Thanks
    501
    Thanked
    399 times in 255 posts

    Highway Code

    I nearly got run over at lunchtime by some stupid B***h turning right into a side road that I was crossing. Just to make sure I was in the right I thought I'd see if the highway code can be found online. It can, and I was. Thought I'd post it here, it's always good to refresh your memory once in a while.

    http://www.highwaycode.gov.uk/

    Proof that I'm right and she's a tw*t:

    http://www.highwaycode.gov.uk/16.shtml <---rule 146 point 2.

    Rich :¬)

  2. #2
    www.5lab.co.uk
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Posts
    6,406
    Thanks
    1
    Thanked
    0 times in 0 posts
    yeah, so if you get run over its technically her fault, however its still a good idea to look out lol
    hughlunnon@yahoo.com | I have sigs turned off..

  3. #3
    Now with added sobriety Rave's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    SE London
    Posts
    9,948
    Thanks
    501
    Thanked
    399 times in 255 posts
    I know matey. With the speed she was going, it wouldn't have made much difference. As it was, I spotted her out of the corner of my eye about half a second before she hit me. Someone on the pavement shouted as well, that probably helped.

    Rich :¬)

  4. #4
    One skin, two skin......
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Durham
    Posts
    1,705
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    1 time in 1 post
    The highway code isn't law IIRC.

    TBH, I think that 'rule' should be changed. Roads should be for cars, lorries, buses, motorbikes and pedal cycles. Pedestrians should only have priority on the FOOTPATH and horses should be confined to fields or designated exercising areas.

  5. #5
    HEXUS.social member Allen's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    Brighton
    Posts
    8,536
    Thanks
    363
    Thanked
    262 times in 168 posts
    • Allen's system
      • Motherboard:
      • ASUS Maximus VIII Gene
      • CPU:
      • Intel Core i5 6600K
      • Memory:
      • 2 x 8GB Kingston HyperX Predator DDR4-3000
      • Storage:
      • 256GB Samsung 950 PRO NVMe M.2 (OS) + 2 x 512GB Samsung 960 EVO in RAID 0 (Games)
      • Graphics card(s):
      • ASUS ROG Strix GeForce GTX 1080 Ti OC
      • PSU:
      • XFX P1-650X-NLG9 XXX 650W Modular
      • Case:
      • Fractal Design Node 804
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 10 Home 64-bit
      • Monitor(s):
      • 27" BenQ XL2730Z + 23" Dell U2311H
      • Internet:
      • Virgin Media 200Mbps
    WTF? If pedestrians have already started crossing then they should stop and go back if a car comes flying round the corner?? LMAO! I bet you wouldn't say that if you weren't a driver!

    Anyway, most drivers these days don't follow the Highway Code so why bother changing anything?

    I agree about the horses though...

  6. #6
    www.5lab.co.uk
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Posts
    6,406
    Thanks
    1
    Thanked
    0 times in 0 posts
    highway code IS law

    the fact that most drivers dont follow it doesnt affect that. if a pedestrian doesnt want to move out of the way of a car then it is his choice. the car should be travelling slow enough to stop in time for a ped anyways. the law wont be changed. why should people not be allowed to ride their horses on roads? roads are not purely for the use of drivers, and those who believe they are are selfish. roads are a method of getting from a-b, and as much as people are allowed to drive thier cars for entertainment rather than transport. so people are allowed to ride horses
    hughlunnon@yahoo.com | I have sigs turned off..

  7. #7
    Will work for beer... nichomach's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Preston, Lancs
    Posts
    6,137
    Thanks
    564
    Thanked
    139 times in 100 posts
    • nichomach's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Gigabyte GA-870A-UD3
      • CPU:
      • AMD Phenom II X6 1055T 95W
      • Memory:
      • 16GB DR3
      • Storage:
      • 1x250GB Maxtor SATAII, 1x 400GB Hitachi SATAII
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Zotac GTX 1060 3GB
      • PSU:
      • Coolermaster 500W
      • Case:
      • Coolermaster Elite 430
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 10
      • Monitor(s):
      • Dell 20" TFT
      • Internet:
      • Virgin Media Cable
    Quote Originally Posted by Big RICHARD
    The highway code isn't law IIRC.

    TBH, I think that 'rule' should be changed. Roads should be for cars, lorries, buses, motorbikes and pedal cycles. Pedestrians should only have priority on the FOOTPATH and horses should be confined to fields or designated exercising areas.

    I vehemently disagree; pedestrians HAVE to cross roads all the time, and there isn't always a controlled crossing anywhere near. The rule doesn't state that if they haven't started to cross you have to stop and let them past, it's stating that if they've already started to cross (i.e. are already in the road) they shouldn't have to play Frogger cause there's a car coming.

  8. #8
    One skin, two skin......
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Durham
    Posts
    1,705
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    1 time in 1 post
    Quote Originally Posted by Big_Al
    WTF? If pedestrians have already started crossing then they should stop and go back if a car comes flying round the corner?? LMAO! I bet you wouldn't say that if you weren't a driver!

    Anyway, most drivers these days don't follow the Highway Code so why bother changing anything?

    I agree about the horses though...

    But the speed limits should be sensible enough so that cars don't have to speed in 30 limits. I.E. out of town speed limit 60, unless absolutely necessary. People would be less likely to speed in a 30 limit if the speed limits were done sensibly. By doing this then pedestrians could cross the road safely and wouldn't be surprised by cars turning up a 45 in a 30 limit and expecting them to be out of the way. Pedestrians should also be encouraged to be more careful when crossing roads. (Not that I am saying Rave wasn't here!)

    If you'd thought sensibly before replying, you wouldn't have needed to LYAO!

  9. #9
    Fun not Frags Geist's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Scotland
    Posts
    658
    Thanks
    34
    Thanked
    27 times in 24 posts
    Just give me a T-shirt with "I dont have insurance." printed on the frount and back

    Thats the thing tho most drivers dont seem to think it is law or even bother reading the thing...
    - Cantankerous -
    - GSV - MarlinsUK - TNGC -

  10. #10
    Will work for beer... nichomach's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Preston, Lancs
    Posts
    6,137
    Thanks
    564
    Thanked
    139 times in 100 posts
    • nichomach's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Gigabyte GA-870A-UD3
      • CPU:
      • AMD Phenom II X6 1055T 95W
      • Memory:
      • 16GB DR3
      • Storage:
      • 1x250GB Maxtor SATAII, 1x 400GB Hitachi SATAII
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Zotac GTX 1060 3GB
      • PSU:
      • Coolermaster 500W
      • Case:
      • Coolermaster Elite 430
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 10
      • Monitor(s):
      • Dell 20" TFT
      • Internet:
      • Virgin Media Cable
    Quote Originally Posted by Big RICHARD
    But the speed limits should be sensible enough so that cars don't have to speed in 30 limits. I.E. out of town speed limit 60, unless absolutely necessary. People would be less likely to speed in a 30 limit if the speed limits were done sensibly. By doing this then pedestrians could cross the road safely and wouldn't be surprised by cars turning up a 45 in a 30 limit and expecting them to be out of the way. Pedestrians should also be encouraged to be more careful when crossing roads. (Not that I am saying Rave wasn't here!)

    If you'd thought sensibly before replying, you wouldn't have needed to LYAO!
    1. Cars don't HAVE to speed in 30 limits anyway, and most 30 limits are in populated areas.
    2. The rule regarding pedestrians has naff-all to do with speed limits, and everything to do with the fact that a pedestrian has a right to cross the road, is vulnerable while doing so, and as such the onus is on you the driver to avoid hitting them.
    3. Yes, pedestrians should be careful when crossing roads but careful won't help you when a car comes flying round a bend at 45+ in a 30 limit, ignoring a pedestrian crossing and nearly kills you. A pedestrian crossing in front of you won't kill you. You hitting a pedestrian because "they should have got out of the way" will kill them.

    A pedestrian is, through force of circumstance, as much a road user as youand has as much right to be there, they are just more vulnerable.

  11. #11
    HEXUS.social member Allen's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    Brighton
    Posts
    8,536
    Thanks
    363
    Thanked
    262 times in 168 posts
    • Allen's system
      • Motherboard:
      • ASUS Maximus VIII Gene
      • CPU:
      • Intel Core i5 6600K
      • Memory:
      • 2 x 8GB Kingston HyperX Predator DDR4-3000
      • Storage:
      • 256GB Samsung 950 PRO NVMe M.2 (OS) + 2 x 512GB Samsung 960 EVO in RAID 0 (Games)
      • Graphics card(s):
      • ASUS ROG Strix GeForce GTX 1080 Ti OC
      • PSU:
      • XFX P1-650X-NLG9 XXX 650W Modular
      • Case:
      • Fractal Design Node 804
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 10 Home 64-bit
      • Monitor(s):
      • 27" BenQ XL2730Z + 23" Dell U2311H
      • Internet:
      • Virgin Media 200Mbps
    Quote Originally Posted by Big RICHARD
    But the speed limits should be sensible enough so that cars don't have to speed in 30 limits. I.E. out of town speed limit 60, unless absolutely necessary. People would be less likely to speed in a 30 limit if the speed limits were done sensibly. By doing this then pedestrians could cross the road safely and wouldn't be surprised by cars turning up a 45 in a 30 limit and expecting them to be out of the way. Pedestrians should also be encouraged to be more careful when crossing roads. (Not that I am saying Rave wasn't here!)

    If you'd thought sensibly before replying, you wouldn't have needed to LYAO!
    What has speed limits got to do with pedestrians crossing the road? Have you ever thought that there is no need to speed? Why do it? If you're in that much of a hurry then leave earlier.

    The limits are there for a reason! Have you ever seen what difference a 30mph car and a 40mph car can do to a human body? I have and it's NOT pretty. Limits of 45mph instead of 30mph would cause 100% more times deaths on the roads... now who's not sensible?

    Drivers should be more aware of pedestrians and cyclists because they are quite safe in their cars yet pedestrians aren't much more exposed to dangers on the road. And yes, I also agree that they have every right to cross the road. How would we get anywhere otherwise?

  12. #12
    One skin, two skin......
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Durham
    Posts
    1,705
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    1 time in 1 post
    Quote Originally Posted by 5lab
    highway code IS law

    the fact that most drivers dont follow it doesnt affect that. if a pedestrian doesnt want to move out of the way of a car then it is his choice. the car should be travelling slow enough to stop in time for a ped anyways. the law wont be changed. why should people not be allowed to ride their horses on roads? roads are not purely for the use of drivers, and those who believe they are are selfish. roads are a method of getting from a-b, and as much as people are allowed to drive thier cars for entertainment rather than transport. so people are allowed to ride horses

    The highway code is NOT law. The road traffic act is law. Hence highway 'CODE' not, highway 'LAW'!

  13. #13
    HEXUS.social member Allen's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    Brighton
    Posts
    8,536
    Thanks
    363
    Thanked
    262 times in 168 posts
    • Allen's system
      • Motherboard:
      • ASUS Maximus VIII Gene
      • CPU:
      • Intel Core i5 6600K
      • Memory:
      • 2 x 8GB Kingston HyperX Predator DDR4-3000
      • Storage:
      • 256GB Samsung 950 PRO NVMe M.2 (OS) + 2 x 512GB Samsung 960 EVO in RAID 0 (Games)
      • Graphics card(s):
      • ASUS ROG Strix GeForce GTX 1080 Ti OC
      • PSU:
      • XFX P1-650X-NLG9 XXX 650W Modular
      • Case:
      • Fractal Design Node 804
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 10 Home 64-bit
      • Monitor(s):
      • 27" BenQ XL2730Z + 23" Dell U2311H
      • Internet:
      • Virgin Media 200Mbps
    Quote Originally Posted by Big RICHARD
    The highway code is NOT law. The road traffic act is law. Hence highway 'CODE' not, highway 'LAW'!
    Do you consider yourself exempt from the rules of driving then whether they are the law or not? Coz you seem to be arguing about this a lot... Seems to me you might not be a safe driver as you obviously don't care much for the Highway Code.

    Why do you think the Highway Code exists? To promote SAFE driving! There is such a thing called consideration and courtesy to other road users you know, whether they are cars, lorries, motorbikes or even pedestrians...

  14. #14
    One skin, two skin......
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Durham
    Posts
    1,705
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    1 time in 1 post
    Quote Originally Posted by Big_Al
    Do you consider yourself exempt from the rules of driving then whether they are the law or not? Coz you seem to be arguing about this a lot... Seems to me you might not be a safe driver as you obviously don't care much for the Highway Code.

    Why do you think the Highway Code exists? To promote SAFE driving! There is such a thing called consideration and courtesy to other road users you know, whether they are cars, lorries, motorbikes or even pedestrians...
    I abide by the highway code! I don't speed, with the exception of the motorways (which statistically are the safest roads, even though most people speed on the motorway), I show more courtesy for other drivers than most other people. I am arguing that the roads should be for vehicles and footpaths for pedestrians. Designated crossing areas and/or signposting areas which allow pedestrians right of way on the road (IE town centres)would keep everyone happy.

  15. #15
    www.5lab.co.uk
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Posts
    6,406
    Thanks
    1
    Thanked
    0 times in 0 posts
    it wouldnt keep me happy. i want to be able to cross any road when i want - im not walking all the way to the end of my street then back up the other side just cos my cars parked over the road
    hughlunnon@yahoo.com | I have sigs turned off..

  16. #16
    www.5lab.co.uk
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Posts
    6,406
    Thanks
    1
    Thanked
    0 times in 0 posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Big RICHARD
    The highway code is NOT law. The road traffic act is law. Hence highway 'CODE' not, highway 'LAW'!

    actually, the road traffic act does not entirely cover the highway code - the highway code is covered by

    Functions of Traffic Wardens Order 1970 FTWO
    Highway Act 1835 or 1980 (as indicated) HA
    Horses (Protective Headgear for Young Riders) Regulations 1992 H(PHYR)R
    Motor Cycles (Protective Helmets) Regulations 1980 MC(PH)R
    Motorways Traffic (England & Wales) Regulations 1982 MT(E&W)R
    Motorways Traffic (Scotland) Regulations 1995 MT(S)R
    Motor Vehicles (Driving Licences) Regulations 1999 MV(DL)R
    Motor Vehicles (Wearing of Seat Belts) Regulations 1993 MV(WSB)R
    Motor Vehicles (Wearing of Seat Belts by Children in Front Seats)
    Regulations 1993 MV(WSBCFS)R
    Pedal Cycles (Construction & Use) Regulations 1983 PCUR
    Public Passenger Vehicles Act 1981 PPVA
    Road Traffic Act 1988 or 1991 (as indicated) RTA
    Road Traffic (New Drivers) Act 1995 RT(ND)A
    Road Traffic Regulation Act 1984 RTRAv
    Road Vehicles (Construction & Use) Regulations 1986 CUR
    Road Vehicles Lighting Regulations 1989 RVLR
    Road Vehicles (Registration & Licensing) Regulations 1971 RV(R&L)R
    Roads (Scotland) Act 1984 R(S)A
    Traffic Signs Regulations & General Directions 1994 TSRGD
    Vehicle Excise and Registration Act 1994 VERA
    Zebra, Pelican and Puffin Pedestrian Crossings Regulations and General Directions 1997 ZPPPCRGD
    hughlunnon@yahoo.com | I have sigs turned off..

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. £10 off £100 at PC WORLD voucher code?
    By bertie in forum Retail Therapy and Bargains
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 15-01-2004, 03:22 PM
  2. Help with stepping code
    By Donny John in forum PC Hardware and Components
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 03-12-2003, 05:24 PM
  3. vb/access code
    By blockers in forum Software
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 10-11-2003, 09:12 PM
  4. CPU code info
    By Lexeus in forum PC Hardware and Components
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 21-10-2003, 04:39 PM
  5. Stepping code question
    By Knoxville in forum PC Hardware and Components
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 04-09-2003, 03:46 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •