Yeah Right, 160MPH...Whatever...

[[GSV]Trig]

Aye, classic one that, didnt know anyone outside of GSV used it..

I was playing on our CS server and someone started TK'ing and being a general nub I kicked him n he came back n called me said nugget of cockness, I kicked him again n made note of said insult

[Vimeous]

Originally posted by Big RICHARD
Yeah!

Clio 2.0 16v - 172 bhp
Clio 3.0 v6 - 230 bhp

Yeah, he can beat a rear wheel drive mid engined 3.0 v6 RENAULT in his peugeot! BOLLOX!

Sorry to say but this is totally true. The Clio V6 weighs near 1400kg and that's at huge disadvantage. I can't give you Autocars official figures but they're the ones that found it out first. The Sport version of the 172 is even faster and cost £1k less cos they have taken all the heavy goodies out.
The MK2 V6 has 250bhp and is a much quicker motor

Edit : Oops. Overstated the case for the 172 a bit, it is a touch slower than the 230bhp V6, though not by much. Autocars headline figures are:

• Sport Clio : 172 | V6 (MK1)
  Top Speed : 137 | 146
  0-60 : 7.1 | 6.6
  0-100 : 17.9 | 17.1
  Bhp : 172 | 230
  lb/ft : 148 | 221
  Kg : 1059 | 1340

Gives -
Power to Weight (per tonne) : 162.4 | 171.6
The V6 MK2 at their recent handling day has 255bhp on 1400kg to give 182 bhp per tonne.

[[GSV]Trig]

1400, Jesus thats near 200kg's fatter than my cav!!!

[Creature]

omfg its at 11 pages now

lol

[fondie]

There is a simple saying boys - you can't polish a turd.

legendary!

[IainB]

LOL - just read the whole of that thread......
£1200 for a set of 4 pistons....... LOL LOL LOL
I can get a 'proper' racing std forged set for a V8 for £1200....
Nugget..... high compression and throttle bodies DO NOT make your car do 160...