Yes. They fund an improved service.
No. An unnecessary motorist tax, abolish it now!
Originally Posted by Advice Trinity by Knoxville
Depends where you're going. Some places, and traffic-dependent, and how much of a hurry I'm in, MAYBE. But the last few trips have been London-Stoke, and for that the M6 isn't necessary at all. Depending on quite how I set my SatNav, and on prevailing traffic, it tends to route me M1-A50-A500-A34, which is motorway, then dual-carriageway for all but about the last two miles. And it's a route I've yet to catch serious delays on, whereas several times in the last month, the M6 has had lane-closing incidents causing serious delays.
Personally, for some routes (Coventry, Brum, etc) I prefer M1-M45-A45, or even A-roads coming up through Leamington, etc. The M6 is okay when it works, but too often I've got caught up, and often before I even get to the toll bit, in which case, it doesn't work for me. But some places there might be no obvious or practical way round it. For Stoke, there sure is.
The idea behind the M6 Toll was to relieve congestion on the M6, which it has spectacularly failed to do due to the fact that not many people (and in part almost no trucks) use it.
Saracen, I've been stuck on the A500 a few times, it can get bad at rush hour and if any incident occurs it pretty much just snarls up immediately (2 lanes and no hard shoulder will do that).
So much for the "we'll cancel the toll once the bridge has paid for itself".
It paid for itself a long time ago and they have realised it is easy money.
When I first moved to the area in 2000 the toll was £1 each way, now £2.50 each way.
Can you think of anything else that has gone up 150% in 14 years. Not even petrol went up that fast, and we've had road blocks and strikes over that.
As has been said before, even Dick Turpin was honest enough to use a gun when he was robbing you.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)