Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst 1234
Results 49 to 51 of 51

Thread: Adventures in Hypermiling - Increasing MPGs

  1. #49
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Manchester
    Posts
    2,901
    Thanks
    67
    Thanked
    182 times in 136 posts
    • Butcher's system
      • Motherboard:
      • MSI Z97 Gaming 3
      • CPU:
      • i7-4790K
      • Memory:
      • 8 GB Corsair 1866 MHz
      • Storage:
      • 120GB SSD, 240GB SSD, 2TB HDD
      • Graphics card(s):
      • MSI GTX 970
      • PSU:
      • Antec 650W
      • Case:
      • Big Black Cube!
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 7

    Re: Adventures in Hypermiling - Increasing MPGs

    Quote Originally Posted by badass View Post
    My take on that image: With the normal imperfect mixing of any engine, 12.6:1 makes sure there's enough petrol to burn all of the oxygen. When running 15.4:1 there is enough oxygen to make sure all of the fuel is burnt. Side note: I'm not disagreeing at all BTW. The typed word can often lead to misunderstandings.
    Yes, I suspect with ideal mixing then stoichiometric would work out best, however it never is ideal so going a little leaner helps reduce rich pockets in the mixture.
    Also 12.6:1 gives more power mainly because there is more fuel and sufficient oxygen to burn it and power is largely determined by the amount of fuel.

  2. #50
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    4,945
    Thanks
    171
    Thanked
    388 times in 315 posts
    • badass's system
      • Motherboard:
      • ASUS P8Z77-m pro
      • CPU:
      • Core i5 3570K
      • Memory:
      • 32GB
      • Storage:
      • 1TB Samsung 850 EVO, 2TB WD Green
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Radeon RX 580
      • PSU:
      • Corsair HX520W
      • Case:
      • Silverstone SG02-F
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 10 X64
      • Monitor(s):
      • Del U2311, LG226WTQ
      • Internet:
      • 80/20 FTTC

    Re: Adventures in Hypermiling - Increasing MPGs

    Quote Originally Posted by Butcher View Post
    Yes, I suspect with ideal mixing then stoichiometric would work out best, however it never is ideal so going a little leaner helps reduce rich pockets in the mixture.
    Also 12.6:1 gives more power mainly because there is more fuel and sufficient oxygen to burn it and power is largely determined by the amount of fuel.
    Also that even incomplete combustion can be "complete" e.g. CO as a waste gas rather than CO2 still can completely use up all of the fuel and oxygen - but the CO can be further "burned" with oxygen to release more energy (it produces a blue flame!)
    "In a perfect world... spammers would get caught, go to jail, and share a cell with many men who have enlarged their penises, taken Viagra and are looking for a new relationship."

  3. #51
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Manchester
    Posts
    2,901
    Thanks
    67
    Thanked
    182 times in 136 posts
    • Butcher's system
      • Motherboard:
      • MSI Z97 Gaming 3
      • CPU:
      • i7-4790K
      • Memory:
      • 8 GB Corsair 1866 MHz
      • Storage:
      • 120GB SSD, 240GB SSD, 2TB HDD
      • Graphics card(s):
      • MSI GTX 970
      • PSU:
      • Antec 650W
      • Case:
      • Big Black Cube!
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 7

    Re: Adventures in Hypermiling - Increasing MPGs

    This is essentially what the catalyst does - burn off any CO and unburnt fuel. It's also why when you start some cars they are noticeably louder, the valve timing is altered on cold start to throw fuel down the exhaust to heat the catalyst.

Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst 1234

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 2 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 2 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •