http://www.whatcar.com/News_Article....=214791&EL_ID=
i'm dissapointed. no 1000bhp and no 1000 torquey things. surely when you've got up to 950 the extra 50 isnt *much* more effort?
http://www.whatcar.com/News_Article....=214791&EL_ID=
i'm dissapointed. no 1000bhp and no 1000 torquey things. surely when you've got up to 950 the extra 50 isnt *much* more effort?
hughlunnon@yahoo.com | I have sigs turned off..
Limited by temperature problems and reliability, vw made it pass exactly the same endurance and reliabilty tests as its passats/golfs and the like, something most hypercars would ever be put through.
The flip side to your question is, when you have 987bhp and 0-200 in 14ish seconds (maclaren F1 did that in around 25secs) do you need that extra 14bhp
Still better looking than the enzo tbh
Weeeeeeeeak.... it's lost so much of it's marketing appeal without the 1000HP thing.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)