350+400D are very small without a battery grip - mind u i can't use any of the non-pro Canon DSLR's without the battery grip as my fingers fall off the bottom..
350+400D are very small without a battery grip - mind u i can't use any of the non-pro Canon DSLR's without the battery grip as my fingers fall off the bottom..
| Photographer |
LOL even with my 30D my finger fall off the bottom, but battery grip make it a pain to shoot for long, quite heavy
Primary kit:
Fuji S5 Pro - Nikkor AF 50/1.8 - Nikkor AF 85/1.8
Epson RD-1
Film Kit:
Leica M3 - Summicron 50/2 DR - Zeiss ZM 25/2.8 - M-Rokkor 40/2
Olympus OM2n - Zuiko 50/2 Macro - Zuiko 50/1.4 - Zuiko 35/2.8
I'd guess a lot of it is what you're used to, and after 35 years of normal-sized SLRs, I'm certainly not used to the smaller ones. And I fully agree, personally, about the battery grip - as well as it putting an extra shutter release right where I want it for portrait-oriented use.
Also, I find the smaller cameras feel badly unbalanced with larger lenses. But that probably isn't an issue in this case, at least, not for a while yet, and it's a personal thing, which is why trying them out (if at all possible) is a good idea. It seems it's academic in this case anyway, now.
Oh, and I know people that have bought 300D/350D/400D and upgraded to a 10D/20D/30D/40D because of size, but I also know people with the smaller cameras that have tried the larger-bodied models and not liked the larger size ..... or weight.
Horses for courses, I guess.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)