What is the difference between the two?
and which is better? (in your oppinion)
What is the difference between the two?
and which is better? (in your oppinion)
DTS is generally considered to be a cleverer compression format, and on films such as Gladiator, it can be noticeably good.
But as with lots of things, it's often hard to tell on vanilla kit.
But DTS is the answer in my opinion
Originally Posted by Advice Trinity by Knoxville
I find the following is a good guide to the differences between the 2 ;
http://www.audioholics.com/techtips/...digitaldts.php
As for use - I use dolby as that's what my dvd playback software supports and I didn't want the platinum pack
DTS is higher bit-rate. Dolby Digital is 448kbps and DTS is either 768kbps (sometimes referred to as half bitrate) or 1.5mbps (sometimes referred to as full bitrate).
The general consensus is that DTS is better, although Zak's right, you won't be able to tell a huge difference on cheap-ish kit, it can just sound louder.
Last edited by Howard; 02-08-2005 at 07:06 PM.
Home cinema: Toshiba 42XV555DB Full HD LCD | Onkyo TX-SR705 | NAD C352 | Monitor Audio Bronze B2 | Monitor Audio Bronze C | Monitor Audio Bronze BFX | Yamaha NSC120 | BK Monolith sub | Toshiba HD-EP35 HD-DVD | Samsung BD-P1400 BluRay Player | Pioneer DV-575 | Squeezebox3 | Virgin Media V+ Box
PC: Asus P5B | Core2duo 2.13GHz | 2GB DDR2 PC6400 | Inno3d iChill 7900GS | Auzentech X-Plosion 7.1 | 250GB | 500GB | NEC DVDRW | Dual AG Neovo 19"
HTPC: | Core2Duo E6420 2.13GHz | 2GB DDR2 | 250GBx2 | Radeon X1300 | Terratec Aureon 7.1 | Windows MCE 2005
Laptop: 1.5GHz Centrino | 512MB | 60GB | 15" Wide TFT | Wifi | DVDRW
Originally Posted by directhex
Yes it is. It's just a higher bit-rate.
Home cinema: Toshiba 42XV555DB Full HD LCD | Onkyo TX-SR705 | NAD C352 | Monitor Audio Bronze B2 | Monitor Audio Bronze C | Monitor Audio Bronze BFX | Yamaha NSC120 | BK Monolith sub | Toshiba HD-EP35 HD-DVD | Samsung BD-P1400 BluRay Player | Pioneer DV-575 | Squeezebox3 | Virgin Media V+ Box
PC: Asus P5B | Core2duo 2.13GHz | 2GB DDR2 PC6400 | Inno3d iChill 7900GS | Auzentech X-Plosion 7.1 | 250GB | 500GB | NEC DVDRW | Dual AG Neovo 19"
HTPC: | Core2Duo E6420 2.13GHz | 2GB DDR2 | 250GBx2 | Radeon X1300 | Terratec Aureon 7.1 | Windows MCE 2005
Laptop: 1.5GHz Centrino | 512MB | 60GB | 15" Wide TFT | Wifi | DVDRW
Has nothing to do with how loud it goes, due to having a lower compression ratio
in theory more information about the music is stored.
This allows for wider dynamics and greater resolution of the perceived audio.
For instance.. imagine if your voice only had 2 levels off and on quite and loud
not much good Then increase that to say 4 levels still not much good but
maybe good enough with a varible frequency to understand some words.
scale it up more and more detail is present... same with music / sound effects
and allows those quiter things to have more detail without being swamped out by the noise of other effects.
Does not change the max volume as thats the output of the digital to analog convertor that defines its to volume level.
i find that dts generally has a little more sound going to the rear speakers, but on my cheapish (£300/set) speakers/amp which do both, i cant really tell the difference
hughlunnon@yahoo.com | I have sigs turned off..
A lot of the time the difference can't be noticed (by me, anyway), but the soundtracks that I think sound a lot different are the Lethal Weapon & Die Hard series and Saving Private Ryan.
Even on a cheap (Sherwood) amp these films demonstrate the difference between DD and DTS - in particular when it comes to explosions.
It's not just more volume, the sound does appear more "crisp" and "has more balls" as my dad put it succinctly
Whenever possible I go for a transfer with a DTS soundtrack if it has been done well - there are some DVD transfers where the DTS track sounds "flat" and is just a waste of space on the disc.
~ I have CDO. It's like OCD except the letters are in alphabetical order, as they should be. ~
PC: Win10 x64 | Asus Maximus VIII | Core i7-6700K | 16GB DDR3 | 2x250GB SSD | 500GB SSD | 2TB SATA-300 | GeForce GTX1080
Camera: Canon 60D | Sigma 10-20/4.0-5.6 | Canon 100/2.8 | Tamron 18-270/3.5-6.3
and in a different way. Better thing to compare it to is a PS2 and a Gamecube.Originally Posted by Howard
Totally different route to a similar experinence.
Originally Posted by Advice Trinity by Knoxville
Well yes it's a different codec
Home cinema: Toshiba 42XV555DB Full HD LCD | Onkyo TX-SR705 | NAD C352 | Monitor Audio Bronze B2 | Monitor Audio Bronze C | Monitor Audio Bronze BFX | Yamaha NSC120 | BK Monolith sub | Toshiba HD-EP35 HD-DVD | Samsung BD-P1400 BluRay Player | Pioneer DV-575 | Squeezebox3 | Virgin Media V+ Box
PC: Asus P5B | Core2duo 2.13GHz | 2GB DDR2 PC6400 | Inno3d iChill 7900GS | Auzentech X-Plosion 7.1 | 250GB | 500GB | NEC DVDRW | Dual AG Neovo 19"
HTPC: | Core2Duo E6420 2.13GHz | 2GB DDR2 | 250GBx2 | Radeon X1300 | Terratec Aureon 7.1 | Windows MCE 2005
Laptop: 1.5GHz Centrino | 512MB | 60GB | 15" Wide TFT | Wifi | DVDRW
dts is not compressed like dolby ac3
but dolby is more diffuse in dvd movie
DTS is compressed. Honest. Just at a higher bit rate.
Home cinema: Toshiba 42XV555DB Full HD LCD | Onkyo TX-SR705 | NAD C352 | Monitor Audio Bronze B2 | Monitor Audio Bronze C | Monitor Audio Bronze BFX | Yamaha NSC120 | BK Monolith sub | Toshiba HD-EP35 HD-DVD | Samsung BD-P1400 BluRay Player | Pioneer DV-575 | Squeezebox3 | Virgin Media V+ Box
PC: Asus P5B | Core2duo 2.13GHz | 2GB DDR2 PC6400 | Inno3d iChill 7900GS | Auzentech X-Plosion 7.1 | 250GB | 500GB | NEC DVDRW | Dual AG Neovo 19"
HTPC: | Core2Duo E6420 2.13GHz | 2GB DDR2 | 250GBx2 | Radeon X1300 | Terratec Aureon 7.1 | Windows MCE 2005
Laptop: 1.5GHz Centrino | 512MB | 60GB | 15" Wide TFT | Wifi | DVDRW
What many people forget when comparing DTS and DD tracks on DVDs is that they are often different mixes and so not comparable!
If the mixes are the same to begin with, depending on the material, DTS has the potential to be better, but you still need a pretty decent system (and hearing) to tell.
BTW, DTS is compressed, as others have mentioned. Howard almost got it right with:
"DTS is higher bit-rate. Dolby Digital is 448kbps and DTS is either 768kbps (sometimes referred to as half bitrate) or 1.5mbps (sometimes referred to as full bitrate)."
DD is often 384kbps too for surround mixes. 192kbps is common for DD stereo tracks. I've yet to come across a stereo track in DTS though, other than DTS 24/96, but that's not very common and for another discussion.
If you really want to get into it there are detailed technical papers on both DTS and DD websites saying why their codec is better.
Last edited by Daneel; 13-08-2005 at 06:32 PM.
the bad thing about dts is that you have to go into yer dvd menu and select 'dts' everyone sitting round you is like 'wtf are you doing that for' - if you say 'its better quality' they just give you the *look*
hughlunnon@yahoo.com | I have sigs turned off..
Or you just hit 'Audio' on your DVD remote while the opening credits are starting, lol.
G4 PowerMac - Tiger 10.4 - 512MB RAM
MacBook - 2Ghz - 1GB RAM - 120GB HDD
Rotel RC970BX | DBX DriveRack |2x Rotel RB850
B&W DM640i | Velodyne 1512
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)