Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 16 of 22

Thread: Intel shifting to two year cycles for desktop with no Broadwell being released?

  1. #1
    Moosing about! CAT-THE-FIFTH's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Not here
    Posts
    32,039
    Thanks
    3,910
    Thanked
    5,224 times in 4,015 posts
    • CAT-THE-FIFTH's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Less E-PEEN
      • CPU:
      • Massive E-PEEN
      • Memory:
      • RGB E-PEEN
      • Storage:
      • Not in any order
      • Graphics card(s):
      • EVEN BIGGER E-PEEN
      • PSU:
      • OVERSIZED
      • Case:
      • UNDERSIZED
      • Operating System:
      • DOS 6.22
      • Monitor(s):
      • NOT USUALLY ON....WHEN I POST
      • Internet:
      • FUNCTIONAL

    Intel shifting to two year cycles for desktop with no Broadwell being released?


  2. #2
    Banhammer in peace PeterB kalniel's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    31,025
    Thanks
    1,871
    Thanked
    3,383 times in 2,720 posts
    • kalniel's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Gigabyte Z390 Aorus Ultra
      • CPU:
      • Intel i9 9900k
      • Memory:
      • 32GB DDR4 3200 CL16
      • Storage:
      • 1TB Samsung 970Evo+ NVMe
      • Graphics card(s):
      • nVidia GTX 1060 6GB
      • PSU:
      • Seasonic 600W
      • Case:
      • Cooler Master HAF 912
      • Operating System:
      • Win 10 Pro x64
      • Monitor(s):
      • Dell S2721DGF
      • Internet:
      • rubbish

    Re: Intel shifting to two year cycles for desktop with no Broadwell being released?

    *shrugs* Desktop PC market is saturated already. I've already skipped four generations (lynnfield, sandy b, ivy b, haswell) and still don't see any need to upgrade any time soon.

  3. #3
    Moosing about! CAT-THE-FIFTH's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Not here
    Posts
    32,039
    Thanks
    3,910
    Thanked
    5,224 times in 4,015 posts
    • CAT-THE-FIFTH's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Less E-PEEN
      • CPU:
      • Massive E-PEEN
      • Memory:
      • RGB E-PEEN
      • Storage:
      • Not in any order
      • Graphics card(s):
      • EVEN BIGGER E-PEEN
      • PSU:
      • OVERSIZED
      • Case:
      • UNDERSIZED
      • Operating System:
      • DOS 6.22
      • Monitor(s):
      • NOT USUALLY ON....WHEN I POST
      • Internet:
      • FUNCTIONAL

    Re: Intel shifting to two year cycles for desktop with no Broadwell being released?

    On the flip side it will probably give AMD a bit more breathing space in the desktop market.
    Last edited by CAT-THE-FIFTH; 17-09-2013 at 12:16 PM.

  4. #4
    Banhammer in peace PeterB kalniel's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    31,025
    Thanks
    1,871
    Thanked
    3,383 times in 2,720 posts
    • kalniel's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Gigabyte Z390 Aorus Ultra
      • CPU:
      • Intel i9 9900k
      • Memory:
      • 32GB DDR4 3200 CL16
      • Storage:
      • 1TB Samsung 970Evo+ NVMe
      • Graphics card(s):
      • nVidia GTX 1060 6GB
      • PSU:
      • Seasonic 600W
      • Case:
      • Cooler Master HAF 912
      • Operating System:
      • Win 10 Pro x64
      • Monitor(s):
      • Dell S2721DGF
      • Internet:
      • rubbish

    Re: Intel shifting to two year cycles for desktop with no Broadwell being released?

    Quote Originally Posted by CAT-THE-FIFTH View Post
    On the flip side it will probably give AMD a bit more breathing space in the desktop market.
    Yep, though arguably they've had that since Sandy Bridge, with Ivy B and Haswell giving such small outright performance improvements. Still waiting :/

  5. #5
    root Member DanceswithUnix's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    In the middle of a core dump
    Posts
    12,986
    Thanks
    781
    Thanked
    1,588 times in 1,343 posts
    • DanceswithUnix's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Asus X470-PRO
      • CPU:
      • 5900X
      • Memory:
      • 32GB 3200MHz ECC
      • Storage:
      • 2TB Linux, 2TB Games (Win 10)
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Asus Strix RX Vega 56
      • PSU:
      • 650W Corsair TX
      • Case:
      • Antec 300
      • Operating System:
      • Fedora 39 + Win 10 Pro 64 (yuk)
      • Monitor(s):
      • Benq XL2730Z 1440p + Iiyama 27" 1440p
      • Internet:
      • Zen 900Mb/900Mb (CityFibre FttP)

    Re: Intel shifting to two year cycles for desktop with no Broadwell being released?

    Quote Originally Posted by kalniel View Post
    Yep, though arguably they've had that since Sandy Bridge, with Ivy B and Haswell giving such small outright performance improvements. Still waiting :/
    If AMD are focusing on laptops as well, and I am very sure that they are, then it might be a bit of a wait.

    They are behind on process nodes so they have less transistors to use, but they insist on spending about 50% of those transistors on graphics cores. That's great for a laptop, but chocolate teapot territory for desktop users. I hope they do another desktop chip, but they bottled out of a new socket with Bulldozer which has hurt their performance for ages now, but I don't see them updating until forced to by DDR4 memory going mainstream. They really need to get those PCIe lanes on the CPU out to a graphics card. My worry is that they will update the APUs to FM3, and let AM3+ die off.

  6. #6
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Aberlour, NE Scotland
    Posts
    609
    Thanks
    16
    Thanked
    27 times in 26 posts
    • pastymuncher's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Gigabyte Z390 Aorus Pro
      • CPU:
      • i5 9600K @ 5Ghz
      • Memory:
      • 16Gb Gskill Trident 3866mhz
      • Storage:
      • 250Gb Samsung 970 Evo Polaris+960GB Corsair MP510
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Inno3D GTX1070 iChill Air Boss X3
      • PSU:
      • BeQuiet Straight Power 11 550w
      • Case:
      • Self built desk mod
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 10 Pro 64bit
      • Monitor(s):
      • Dell S2716DG Rev A04
      • Internet:
      • BT Fibre

    Re: Intel shifting to two year cycles for desktop with no Broadwell being released?

    The performance increases are so small these days it won't make a lot of difference anyhow. Sandy to Ivy was small and Ivy to Haswell was even smaller. Same thing with Sandy-E and Ivy-E.

  7. #7
    Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2013
    Posts
    143
    Thanks
    21
    Thanked
    14 times in 8 posts
    • ChinesePate's system
      • Motherboard:
      • MSI Z87-G45
      • CPU:
      • 4670k @ 4.2GHz
      • Memory:
      • 4x4GB G.Skill 1600MHz
      • Storage:
      • 256GB 840 EVO, 240GB ARC 100,4x2TB WD BLUE
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Sapphire R9 290 Tri-X
      • PSU:
      • OCZ 550W
      • Case:
      • HAF 922
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 8.1 Pro
      • Monitor(s):
      • 3x Dell S2740L
      • Internet:
      • [X]

    Re: Intel shifting to two year cycles for desktop with no Broadwell being released?

    Why invest billions in r&d when the competition is waaaay behind?
    I hope this kind of thinking will backfire at Intel some day

  8. #8
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    1,061
    Thanks
    10
    Thanked
    39 times in 38 posts

    Re: Intel shifting to two year cycles for desktop with no Broadwell being released?

    Quote Originally Posted by ChinesePate View Post
    Why invest billions in r&d when the competition is waaaay behind?
    I hope this kind of thinking will backfire at Intel some day
    Intel P4.

    The reason that the PC market is slowing is because of the lack performance incentive over the generation's.
    Intel have done very little to push performance since Core2 brought them out of the dark ages and AMD can only just about compete on price since then.

    If we had another A64 or Core2 moment the PC market would boom again so thats why Intel should spend millions on R&D.
    Last edited by jigger; 01-10-2013 at 02:16 PM.

  9. #9
    Senior Member ajones's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Hampshire
    Posts
    1,143
    Thanks
    64
    Thanked
    70 times in 53 posts

    Re: Intel shifting to two year cycles for desktop with no Broadwell being released?

    I would have thought they'd still be spending a similar amount in R&D, just not need to productise so often.

  10. #10
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    London (almost)
    Posts
    1,080
    Thanks
    20
    Thanked
    34 times in 28 posts

    Re: Intel shifting to two year cycles for desktop with no Broadwell being released?

    Consumers aren't demanding it and neither is the software.

  11. #11
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    1,061
    Thanks
    10
    Thanked
    39 times in 38 posts

    Re: Intel shifting to two year cycles for desktop with no Broadwell being released?

    There's always demand for faster hardware. If you build it the market will buy it.

  12. #12
    Gundam Infinite's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Southport
    Posts
    1,647
    Thanks
    150
    Thanked
    122 times in 93 posts
    • Infinite's system
      • Motherboard:
      • MSI GD80
      • CPU:
      • Intel i5 750
      • Memory:
      • Kingston 16GB
      • Storage:
      • 120GB OCZ Agility 3
      • Graphics card(s):
      • GTX 460 SLI
      • PSU:
      • Corsair HX 650W
      • Case:
      • Silverstone TJ09B-W
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 7 Pro - 64-bit
      • Monitor(s):
      • Dell S2309W
      • Internet:
      • Infinity

    Re: Intel shifting to two year cycles for desktop with no Broadwell being released?

    I was waiting for Skylake anyway, was going to jump on to Haswell but my Lynnfield is still "good enough".

  13. #13
    root Member DanceswithUnix's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    In the middle of a core dump
    Posts
    12,986
    Thanks
    781
    Thanked
    1,588 times in 1,343 posts
    • DanceswithUnix's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Asus X470-PRO
      • CPU:
      • 5900X
      • Memory:
      • 32GB 3200MHz ECC
      • Storage:
      • 2TB Linux, 2TB Games (Win 10)
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Asus Strix RX Vega 56
      • PSU:
      • 650W Corsair TX
      • Case:
      • Antec 300
      • Operating System:
      • Fedora 39 + Win 10 Pro 64 (yuk)
      • Monitor(s):
      • Benq XL2730Z 1440p + Iiyama 27" 1440p
      • Internet:
      • Zen 900Mb/900Mb (CityFibre FttP)

    Re: Intel shifting to two year cycles for desktop with no Broadwell being released?

    Quote Originally Posted by jigger View Post
    There's always demand for faster hardware. If you build it the market will buy it.
    I don't think they could build faster hardware if they wanted to.

    Transistors used to get smaller and faster because the capacitance went down. Now the resistance goes up as much as the capacitance drops, so overall performance stays the same, and no "free" speed increase from a shrink. So they have to spend the extra transistors in a way that improves performance. Make buffers a bit deeper, SSE units wider, caches larger? It has all been done before, so returns are getting smaller. More instructions per clock? Harder than it sounds, thanks to about every 6th instruction being a conditional jump and predicting two jumps per clock is something I don't think has been solved yet.

    Meanwhile, Intel slips into second place after TSMC as biggest semi foundry, because TSMC make stuff people want.

    http://www.icinsights.com/news/bulle...World-In-2Q13/

  14. #14
    Anthropomorphic Personification shaithis's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    The Last Aerie
    Posts
    10,857
    Thanks
    645
    Thanked
    872 times in 736 posts
    • shaithis's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Asus P8Z77 WS
      • CPU:
      • i7 3770k @ 4.5GHz
      • Memory:
      • 32GB HyperX 1866
      • Storage:
      • Lots!
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Sapphire Fury X
      • PSU:
      • Corsair HX850
      • Case:
      • Corsair 600T (White)
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 10 x64
      • Monitor(s):
      • 2 x Dell 3007
      • Internet:
      • Zen 80Mb Fibre

    Re: Intel shifting to two year cycles for desktop with no Broadwell being released?

    *shrug* who upgrades CPU every year anyway?
    Main PC: Asus Rampage IV Extreme / 3960X@4.5GHz / Antec H1200 Pro / 32GB DDR3-1866 Quad Channel / Sapphire Fury X / Areca 1680 / 850W EVGA SuperNOVA Gold 2 / Corsair 600T / 2x Dell 3007 / 4 x 250GB SSD + 2 x 80GB SSD / 4 x 1TB HDD (RAID 10) / Windows 10 Pro, Yosemite & Ubuntu
    HTPC: AsRock Z77 Pro 4 / 3770K@4.2GHz / 24GB / GTX 1080 / SST-LC20 / Antec TP-550 / Hisense 65k5510 4K TV / HTC Vive / 2 x 240GB SSD + 12TB HDD Space / Race Seat / Logitech G29 / Win 10 Pro
    HTPC2: Asus AM1I-A / 5150 / 4GB / Corsair Force 3 240GB / Silverstone SST-ML05B + ST30SF / Samsung UE60H6200 TV / Windows 10 Pro
    Spare/Loaner: Gigabyte EX58-UD5 / i950 / 12GB / HD7870 / Corsair 300R / Silverpower 700W modular
    NAS 1: HP N40L / 12GB ECC RAM / 2 x 3TB Arrays || NAS 2: Dell PowerEdge T110 II / 24GB ECC RAM / 2 x 3TB Hybrid arrays || Network:Buffalo WZR-1166DHP w/DD-WRT + HP ProCurve 1800-24G
    Laptop: Dell Precision 5510 Printer: HP CP1515n || Phone: Huawei P30 || Other: Samsung Galaxy Tab 4 Pro 10.1 CM14 / Playstation 4 + G29 + 2TB Hybrid drive

  15. #15
    Member
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Posts
    168
    Thanks
    5
    Thanked
    5 times in 5 posts
    • minicale's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Asrock z87m OC Formula
      • CPU:
      • i5 4670k
      • Memory:
      • 8GB 2133mhz Vengence Pro
      • Storage:
      • 120gb m500 + 500gb samsung evo
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Evga 1.5GB Gtx 580
      • PSU:
      • 650W 80+ Bronze Seasonic M1211
      • Case:
      • Fractal Mini R2
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 7
      • Monitor(s):
      • 21.5" Asus LED 5ms
      • Internet:
      • BT Broadband

    Re: Intel shifting to two year cycles for desktop with no Broadwell being released?

    Not true the fx processors are great value the 8350 stands strong against the 4670k because you get an extra 4 cores and for a lot cheaper and its only slightly weaker

  16. #16
    Registered+
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    38
    Thanks
    4
    Thanked
    0 times in 0 posts
    • Haggard's system
      • CPU:
      • Amd Athlon XP 3000+
      • Memory:
      • 1408 MB DDR
      • Storage:
      • WD 200GB
      • Graphics card(s):
      • GeForce 7600 GS
      • PSU:
      • Raidmax 500W
      • Operating System:
      • Windows XP SP3

    Re: Intel shifting to two year cycles for desktop with no Broadwell being released?

    Broadwell will still come next year but with a Q delay.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •