Budget and Requirments:
I have a budget of £2000 to spend on a a new system which will will run Avid Express HD Pro. I will also be using Adobe after effects and Photoshop. This computer will solely be used as a workstation and will not be used to play games. I want to use all of the 2k budget as I have set this money aside and want the system to be as fast as possible to future proof it.
My research so far:
PC or Mac:
My first issue was PC vs Mac. I have decided to go PC as I think I can get more for my money. In the past Mac were better for video/photo work but now that they are both running intel chips and windows has "matured" I believe that Apple no longer holds the advantage. Are these assumptions correct?
Which PC:
So having chosen to got the PC route I bought the latest version of PC PRO, went to their A List section and saw the Mesh Elite Extreme QXG80 which comes in at £2249. Hexus.net also reviewed this computer and were impressed by the performance. But to me it seems that it is aimed towards high end gamers, and the graphics card maybe optimised in the wrong way for what I want to do. The reviews can be found here:
http://www.pcpro.co.uk/reviews/97726...eme-qxg80.html
http://www.hexus.net/content/item.php?item=7682
Further investigation into Avid:
According to the website the minimium specifications are:
Minimum PC System Specifications for Avid Xpress Pro
* Windows XP Professional with Service Pack 2
* QuickTime 7.1 or later; Windows Media Player 10 (with version 9.5 codecs)
* 1 GB system memory minimum, 2 GB recommended for HD or high-stream count SD projects
* One of the following processors: (minimum speed listed)
o Xeon 2.4 Ghz (single or dual core)
o Intel Core 2 Duo 2.13 Ghz
o Intel Core Duo 1.67 Ghz
o Pentium 4 1.8 Ghz
o Pentium M 1.8 Ghz (mobile)
o Pentium D 1.7 Ghz (mobile)
* Qualified graphics card (per model, as supported by system vendors)
* Qualified IEEE-1394 FireWire port (integrated or add-in card; Avid Mojo is not supported on notebook systems with PCMCIA cards of any kind)
* 40 GB or larger internal drive
* DVD-ROM or DVD+RW drive
The following specific graphics cards have been tested by Avid:
Graphics Cards (Workstations)
* NVIDIA QuadroFX 3500 PCI Express
* NVIDIA QuadroFX 3450 PCI Express
* NVIDIA QuadroFX 3400 PCI Express
* NVIDIA QuadroFX 1500 PCI Express
* NVIDIA QuadroFX 1400 PCI Express
* NVIDIA QuadroFX 1300 PCI Express
* NVIDIA QuadroFX 560 PCI Express
* NVIDIA QuadroFX 550 PCI Express
* NVIDIA QuadroFX 3000 AGP 8X
* NVIDIA QuadroFX 1100 AGP 8X
* NVIDIA QuadroFX 500 AGP 8X
There will be no problem matching the cpu/ram/hd but the graphics cards are not ones that I have heard of before
Avid and Vista
After a quick google it seems that Avid does in fact not run on Vista, so it looks like the system will have to be XP PRO with service pack 2.
http://www.avid.com/exchange/forums/...howThread.aspx
Dual Screens:
I would like to go dual screen in the future but this is not necessary straight away and is something which I can add later (assuming I have an appropriate gfx card). I have never worked on dual screens before so I don't know how useful they are.
However, I am not sure which size and or spec I should be looking at. Can anyone advise me on a model which is suitable for this kind of work?
System:
I have found a system from scan which is tailored for video editing. It is called the the Intel Slipstream Core 2 Duo as shown here:
http://3xs.scan.co.uk/ShowSystem.asp?SystemID=525
which is priced at £1,602.12 inc VAT
In terms of upgrades to take it to my 2k budget I could go for the Intel Core 2 Quad-Core Pro Q6600, 775, 2.40 GHz, 1066MHz FSB, 8MB Cache, Retail at £453.59 extra. As far as I know this is one of the fastest cpus out there but would this greatly benefit the system?
I am only really looking at this system as I stumbled across it via google and it seems to fit the bill. Are there any other companies I should be looking at?
Have I missed any important things in my research?
I know there are a lot of questions, but I am a bit lost and really appreciate any help that I can get.
Thanks,
Ollie