good summary, pretty much spot on - tho even Eccleston wasn't 100% 'the Dr' imo given the tendency to gurn/mug too much..Originally Posted by Cozwin
my suggestion for the role -
roy cropper from corrie - not with the 'lovely Hayley' as sidekick tho, maybe...
Last edited by sammyc; 17-04-2008 at 06:20 PM.
Dude, seriously, no, that would suck lol.good summary, pretty much spot on - tho even Eccleston wasn't 100% 'the Dr' imo given the tendency to gurn/mug too much..
my suggestion for the role -
roy cropper from corrie - not with the 'lovely Hayley' as sidekick tho, maybe...
^^ 21 mins is not long enough to have seriously considered it. give it more thought you'll see i'm right...
It seems just about the entire fanbase hates Tate - I've seen a thread like this repeated on other forums.
Billie Piper was the best, I think, Freema was great, too and Tate is just horrible.
I gave off an audible gasp of glee when it showed Billie at the end of Episode one and was ecstatic to see Martha playing a main role in the last two episodes.
Next episode with the Doctor's daughter looks interesting
Even taking into account that the "new" Dr Who is totally unrelated to the original series other than the names of the stars/monster (and a tiny part of the backstory), Tate just doesn't fit the role..at least not at the moment.
Billie and Freema both took a few episodes to get into the role, and once they did they both started to play the part well, and fitted in pretty well with the new dr who imo
Its possible that tate will start to fit in better in a few episodes time, but the thing is, the other two had their looks to fall back on - tate clearly doesnt (if your under 50 anyway)
Dr Who sucks!
*runs*
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks
Reply With Quote
