Daily Mail - Good News: Idiotic Readers (well, most of them)

So, the Daily Mail has been known to attract the utter idiots of the Unted Kingdom to their website in the masses, but it's a shame because they are one of a few news websites that produce so many internet article on a daily basis.

But the comments below the articles baffle me, and to think that people actually think that their opinions are "right" and what's worse, the MAJORITY of the craziest comments you have ever read are positive (the little green arrow thing like YouTube), but not 5 or 6, but 500 or 600 clicks!

Take one article I have just been reading.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...ic-images.html

So, naked Brooke Sheilds at 10, big deal?, no not really, nothing bad IMO, what you going to do about Nudiest Beaches with families of all ages then? Make them all illegal?

But the comments are actually ROFL status, and supported in the hundreds, one of them.

Quote:

---

Oh.My.God. And we wonder why adult men want to get with CHILDREN!!!! Whether its in a night club, on the internet or an art gallery. Stop giving the perverted creeps images, it's brainwashing them to think it's okay.

---

So one women, in Devon, is stating that every adult man in the UK will become or is already a peadophile because they see a naked girl, LOL. Have these people not been to beaches or waterparks before? They are two places that you will see children of all ages in the nude.

And it's the whole website filled with crap like that, and one of the comments states that this is the problem of the, wait for it...

Labour Party.

Haha.

Quote:

---

Whether its in a night club,

---

What exactly are underage girls doing in a nightclub eh?

Quote:

---

on the internet

---

If a paedo thinks he's speaking to a 10 year old girl on the net, its probably a 43 year old man

Quote:

---

or an art gallery.

---

Erm... ITS ART! There has been many more f'd up forms of art, this isn't much new. I did last night however see something on B3ta links about some artist who's building a 'Rape Tunnel'. Anyone who goes through the tunnel, he says he'll rape them. Now THAT is pretty messed up

Quote:

---

Stop giving the perverted creeps images

---

People who want to so these things will find ways of doing them. Same as piracy. If someone wants something, nothing's going to stop them.

Quote:

---

Stop giving the perverted creeps images

---

Because of course a single artistic image, displayed in a public place, is a far more lucrative prospect for paedophiles than the scores of the stuff I imagine they can already get their hands on... :rolleyes:

Although it seems that the commenters have missed the potential benefits of such an exhibition; if all sex offenders will make a beeline for the room containing the picture, then they will be trapped in a confined space, where amassed Daily Mail readers can exact justice!

Quote:

---

So one women, in Devon, is stating that every adult man in the UK will become or is already a peadophile because they see a naked girl

---

That said, I would just like to raise the point of the following:


http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2009/...80_224x423.jpg

And, while I do not dispute the claims of that one woman from Devon, I do wish to thank Brook Shields for helping me to not become a peadophile after looking at her half-naked 14 year old body, by being fugly.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by BlackDwarf

If a paedo thinks he's speaking to a 10 year old girl on the net, its probably a 43 year old man

---

EVERYONE on the internet is a 43-year-old man. It's scientific fact!

http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3091/...3936d7.jpg?v=0

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by BlackDwarf

Same as piracy. If someone wants something, nothing's going to stop them.

---

which piracy y'all be talking about

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3AzpByR3MvI

Back on topic, I am fairly liberal on those things, and not particularly offended by it. But there has to be a line somewhere even in edgy arts, and while I am not sure where mine lies, I do find it entirely understandable that this is taking too far for some.

A nudist beach is a poor comparison, I doubt children in nudist beach would wear make up to make them look like (more) like a woman (well, at least shoulder up), 'oiled', and making direct eye contact with the viewer.

that doesn't answer the question

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by TooNice

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3AzpByR3MvI

---

This link is HIGHLY inappropriate - it features a child and therefore is as good as child pornography to a paedophile viewing it.

Don't get me wrong, child molestation is one of the absolute worst and most despicable crimes, but idiots such as those on the Daily Mail site just undermine the credibility of more intelligent and better-reasoned arguments for tough measures against paedophiles.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jItz-uNjoZA

Paedo theme song.

Well... http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/entertain...re/8284213.stm

Quote:

---

Tate pulls nude child star image

A nude photo of actress Brooke Shields aged 10 has been removed from a major exhibition at the Tate Modern, following a police pornography probe.

---

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by EvilWeevil

Well... http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/entertain...re/8284213.stm

---

all i can say is:


AAAARARAGHAHAJKDNAP OFJAPVNA{ODFNG{V!


when will political correctness stop and when will common sense prevail?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by directhex

EVERYONE on the internet is a 43-year-old man. It's scientific fact!

---

I am this close to sigging that. Unfortunately I'm older than that !

I think people need to remember *why* child pornography is wrong and bad. It's because to make it requires exploiting a child who doesn't know any better and doesn't have the power to defend themselves. The image of Brook Shields *may* fall under that catagory, depending on how much protection she got from her parents and her agent at the time.

Quote:

---

If a paedo thinks he's speaking to a 10 year old girl on the net, its probably a 43 year old man

---

More likely a policeman - or a potential blackmailer...