"Mice who had been soaked in Vaseline and had strings attached to their tails"

[TheAnimus]

Some viewers may find the text in the following link offensive:

http://law.rightpundits.com/?p=1473

I'm just in disbelief, I mean seriously, wtf?!

[Salazaar]

I mean seriously, wtf?!

That pretty much sums it up! Some people are just wrong in the head.

[malfunction]

Some people are just deeply messed up. Hopefully he'll be the one being buggered in prison soon. Assuming that he doesn't relish the prospect of course... (no horses for courses puns please...)

[matty-hodgson]

Some people are just deeply messed up. Hopefully he'll be the one being buggered in prison soon. Assuming that he doesn't relish the prospect of course... (no horses for courses puns please...)

"Sausage down a well" after a horse tbh.

[jim]

I know, I mean leave the poor guy in peace.

Political correctness gone mad

[Rob_B]

Judging by the comments I'm certainly not clicking that link from my work PC!

[Brucelles]

I know, I mean leave the poor guy in peace.

Political correctness gone mad

I know. I mean it says in the Bible that Man was given dominion over all the animals, right? It's OK to do whatever we want to them. It says so, right there in black and white.

Rob_B it is just a news link, I don't think it would trip your work filth filter, but it is pretty bloody icky.

[TheAnimus]

its SFW, but its NSFM (Mind)

[JPreston]

Interesting that it's perfectly acceptable to kill, butcher, publicly barbeque and then eat a cow, but if one were to engage in light (and for all anyone knows, consensual) foreplay with it then we "both have committed an abomination and will surely be put to death".

It seems the measure of harm that we (think we) normally apply when deciding what acts to proscribe is for some reason not relevant when it comes to the specific issue of sex with farmyard animals - alone out of all fields of human activity - doesn't it? Discuss...