Aoccdrnig to rscheearch at Cmabrigde Uinervtisy....

[AD-15]

...it deosn't mttaer in waht oredr the ltteers in a wrod are, the olny iprmoetnt tihng is taht the frist and lsat ltteer be at the rghit pclae. The rset can be a tatol mses and you can sitll raed it wouthit a porbelm. This is bcuseae the huamn mnid deos not raed ervey lteter by istlef, but the wrod as a wlohe.


I think this explains why fellow Hexites have been able to read my posts without much difficulty.

[Singh400]

This has been done to death many a time. Very old, but still interesting

[Lucio]

And AFAIK it's not any research done by Cambridge University

[Jay]

looks like leet txt talk to me

[AD-15]

I didn't think it was real research at Cambridge, but copying and pasting into google churned out a Cambridge link at teh top, meh.

[jim]

The thing I find strange about this is that if I think about it, I can't understand it. But if I just glance over the words, as I normally would when reading, it all makes perfect sense.

[kalniel]

In other research, the same post will appear at least 10 times in a couple of years on a reasonably active forum...

[j.col]

this is soooooo old now.
but as mentioned already, still interesting

[santa claus]

Hmmm, my research, based on nothing, would suggest that most men will probably only see a 3-letter word here: Sexupercalifragilisticpialidocious

[kalniel]

Hmmm, my research, based on nothing, would suggest that most men will probably only see a 3-letter word here: Sexupercalifragilisticpialidocious

Frag has four letters doesn't it?

[Blastuk]

Well, I'll respond with a video http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TNStNUizxhE

[santa claus]

Frag has four letters doesn't it?

Hrhrhr! You need to get out more

[jim]

Hrhrhr! You need to get out more

Or in.

[g8ina]

I did some "work" on this a few yrsea ago. If you use words which make anagrams, it's almost impossible to read - fired/fried, filed/field etc. I wrote a short story, Ill see if I can find it.