Not unless it's changed very recently and slipped past me.
The slippery bit is that copyright is a curious blend of national legislation reflecting the bits that are agreed in international treaty and conventions, and national legislation reflecting local preferences.
Format shifting isn't illegal in some jurisdictions, but unless it's changed, it still is here. Changes were recommended in the copyright white paper about 5 years ago, but IIRC, the provisions were taken out when the Act was rammed through right before the last election.
What makes sense, in my opinion, is that if you own the original, legit media, format-shifting to a convenient media for personal convenience is so widespread that its' common practice, and enforcing a ban is utterly unenforceable. I wonder who buys a CD, then buys again for their MP3 player? Probably about the same percentage that, 40 years ago, would buy an LP for the home, and then buy a cassette tape for the car. That is, almost nobody.
Format-shifting, for those that have a legitimate version, should be legal and it's patently daft, ridiculous, idiotic, moronic and stupid, not to mention unenforceable, for it to not be .... but as far as I know, it still isn't legal. Which says something about the state of some laws, and lawmakers.