Page 9 of 9 FirstFirst ... 6789
Results 129 to 144 of 144

Thread: Samsung vs Apple case moves to jury

  1. 20-09-2012, 09:39 PM #129
    Bunjiweb
    Bunjiweb is offline
    Ol' Timer Bunjiweb's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Gloucestershire
    Posts
    2,903
    Thanks
    166
    Thanked
    135 times in 97 posts
    • Bunjiweb's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Gigabyte UD
      • CPU:
      • AMD Phenom X4 955 @ 3.6GHZ
      • Memory:
      • 8GB
      • Storage:
      • 2950GB
      • Graphics card(s):
      • nVidia GTX 550 Ti OC
      • Case:
      • Alienware 7500
      • Operating System:
      • Win 7 Ultimate
      • Monitor(s):
      • 28" HannsG HG281D
      • Internet:
      • Virgin V.I.P. 60mb

    Re: Samsung vs Apple case moves to jury

    Well the same story is on CNET and BGR as well... If true then it only adds to my utter hatred of Apple's business practices.
    =========
    NOTHING TO BE SEE HERE, MOVE ALONG PLEASE....

    :: of all the things i've lost i miss my mind the most ::
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  2. 12-10-2012, 09:27 AM #130
    CAT-THE-FIFTH
    CAT-THE-FIFTH is offline
    Moosing about! CAT-THE-FIFTH's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Not here
    Posts
    32,042
    Thanks
    3,909
    Thanked
    5,213 times in 4,005 posts
    • CAT-THE-FIFTH's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Less E-PEEN
      • CPU:
      • Massive E-PEEN
      • Memory:
      • RGB E-PEEN
      • Storage:
      • Not in any order
      • Graphics card(s):
      • EVEN BIGGER E-PEEN
      • PSU:
      • OVERSIZED
      • Case:
      • UNDERSIZED
      • Operating System:
      • DOS 6.22
      • Monitor(s):
      • NOT USUALLY ON....WHEN I POST
      • Internet:
      • FUNCTIONAL

    Re: Samsung vs Apple case moves to jury

    http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-19919298
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  3. 12-10-2012, 10:17 AM #131
    Larkspeed
    Guest

    Re: Samsung vs Apple case moves to jury

    Looks like the courts are finally starting to realize what apple are really up to. Lets see if this trend continues
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  4. 12-10-2012, 10:17 AM #132
    CAT-THE-FIFTH
    CAT-THE-FIFTH is offline
    Moosing about! CAT-THE-FIFTH's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Not here
    Posts
    32,042
    Thanks
    3,909
    Thanked
    5,213 times in 4,005 posts
    • CAT-THE-FIFTH's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Less E-PEEN
      • CPU:
      • Massive E-PEEN
      • Memory:
      • RGB E-PEEN
      • Storage:
      • Not in any order
      • Graphics card(s):
      • EVEN BIGGER E-PEEN
      • PSU:
      • OVERSIZED
      • Case:
      • UNDERSIZED
      • Operating System:
      • DOS 6.22
      • Monitor(s):
      • NOT USUALLY ON....WHEN I POST
      • Internet:
      • FUNCTIONAL

    Re: Samsung vs Apple case moves to jury

    http://www.groklaw.net/article.php?s...21002201632770
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  5. 12-10-2012, 10:25 AM #133
    Larkspeed
    Guest

    Re: Samsung vs Apple case moves to jury

    ok that's a bit heady reading trying to read it just confused the hell out of me. care to put it in laymens terms for us
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  6. 12-10-2012, 10:32 AM #134
    kopite
    kopite is offline
    Senior Member kopite's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Liverpool
    Posts
    3,499
    Thanks
    81
    Thanked
    158 times in 127 posts
    • kopite's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Asus Maximus IV Gene-Z
      • CPU:
      • Intel Core i5 2500K
      • Memory:
      • 8GB DDR3 1600 MHz Corsair Memory Vengeance Black
      • Storage:
      • 128GB Crucial m4 for main drive. 3.5 TB of storage space over western Digital Drives
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Gigabyte NVIDIA GTX 970 G1 Gaming Edition
      • PSU:
      • 750W ANTEC TRUEPOWER
      • Case:
      • Silverstone Fortress FT03
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 10
      • Monitor(s):
      • 1 x 27 inch dell Monitor 1 x 20 inch Dell monitor
      • Internet:
      • Virgin media 150MB

    Re: Samsung vs Apple case moves to jury

    The more that comes out about this the more it does look like he wanted to get back at samsung..
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  7. 12-10-2012, 10:36 AM #135
    CAT-THE-FIFTH
    CAT-THE-FIFTH is offline
    Moosing about! CAT-THE-FIFTH's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Not here
    Posts
    32,042
    Thanks
    3,909
    Thanked
    5,213 times in 4,005 posts
    • CAT-THE-FIFTH's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Less E-PEEN
      • CPU:
      • Massive E-PEEN
      • Memory:
      • RGB E-PEEN
      • Storage:
      • Not in any order
      • Graphics card(s):
      • EVEN BIGGER E-PEEN
      • PSU:
      • OVERSIZED
      • Case:
      • UNDERSIZED
      • Operating System:
      • DOS 6.22
      • Monitor(s):
      • NOT USUALLY ON....WHEN I POST
      • Internet:
      • FUNCTIONAL

    Re: Samsung vs Apple case moves to jury

    Quote Originally Posted by Larkspeed View Post
    ok that's a bit heady reading trying to read it just confused the hell out of me. care to put it in laymens terms for us
    Basically, the foreman might have had bad blood with Seagate and Samsung is a big shareholder in Seagate. One of the lawyers who sued the foreman on behalf of Seagate, is married to one of the Samsung lawyers in the current case. It seems he did not mention this before the trial.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  8. 12-10-2012, 10:59 AM #136
    Andeh13
    Andeh13 is offline
    Formerly known as Andehh Andeh13's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Northampton
    Posts
    3,354
    Thanks
    855
    Thanked
    258 times in 153 posts
    • Andeh13's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Gigabyte GA-P35
      • CPU:
      • Intel Q6600
      • Memory:
      • 4gb Corsair XMS2 800mhz
      • Storage:
      • 1 x 250gb Western Digital AAKS, 2 x 500gb Western Digital AAKS, 1TB WD Caviar Green
      • Graphics card(s):
      • BFG Geforce 8800GTS 512mb
      • PSU:
      • Corsair HX520
      • Case:
      • Antec 900
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 7 64bit
      • Monitor(s):
      • Samsung 24" & Sony 17"
      • Internet:
      • Virgin 10mb... hate them!
    How about that, does sound suitably suspicious to me! Foreman clearly exerted bias, as he admitted in numerous news is outlets!
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  9. 12-10-2012, 11:25 AM #137
    Larkspeed
    Guest

    Re: Samsung vs Apple case moves to jury

    Quote Originally Posted by CAT-THE-FIFTH View Post
    Basically, the foreman might have had bad blood with Seagate and Samsung is a big shareholder in Seagate. One of the lawyers who sued the foreman on behalf of Seagate, is married to one of the Samsung lawyers in the current case. It seems he did not mention this before the trial.
    Thanks for that

    Put that way it certainly does sound dodgey and grounds for a retrial
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  10. 12-10-2012, 01:43 PM #138
    peterb
    peterb is offline
    The late but legendary peterb - Onward and Upward peterb's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Looking down & checking on swearing
    Posts
    19,378
    Thanks
    2,892
    Thanked
    3,403 times in 2,693 posts

    Re: Samsung vs Apple case moves to jury

    Good news - means I can get my iphone 4 with a clear conscience - although finding mt way bqack from the store might be a problem...






    /dons fire proof clothing and tin hat.
    (\__/)
    (='.'=)
    (")_(")

    Been helped or just 'Like' a post? Use the Thanks button!
    My broadband speed - 750 Meganibbles/minute
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  11. 12-10-2012, 01:55 PM #139
    CAT-THE-FIFTH
    CAT-THE-FIFTH is offline
    Moosing about! CAT-THE-FIFTH's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Not here
    Posts
    32,042
    Thanks
    3,909
    Thanked
    5,213 times in 4,005 posts
    • CAT-THE-FIFTH's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Less E-PEEN
      • CPU:
      • Massive E-PEEN
      • Memory:
      • RGB E-PEEN
      • Storage:
      • Not in any order
      • Graphics card(s):
      • EVEN BIGGER E-PEEN
      • PSU:
      • OVERSIZED
      • Case:
      • UNDERSIZED
      • Operating System:
      • DOS 6.22
      • Monitor(s):
      • NOT USUALLY ON....WHEN I POST
      • Internet:
      • FUNCTIONAL

    Re: Samsung vs Apple case moves to jury

    Quote Originally Posted by peterb View Post
    /dons fire proof clothing and tin hat.


    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  12. 24-10-2012, 07:39 PM #140
    CAT-THE-FIFTH
    CAT-THE-FIFTH is offline
    Moosing about! CAT-THE-FIFTH's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Not here
    Posts
    32,042
    Thanks
    3,909
    Thanked
    5,213 times in 4,005 posts
    • CAT-THE-FIFTH's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Less E-PEEN
      • CPU:
      • Massive E-PEEN
      • Memory:
      • RGB E-PEEN
      • Storage:
      • Not in any order
      • Graphics card(s):
      • EVEN BIGGER E-PEEN
      • PSU:
      • OVERSIZED
      • Case:
      • UNDERSIZED
      • Operating System:
      • DOS 6.22
      • Monitor(s):
      • NOT USUALLY ON....WHEN I POST
      • Internet:
      • FUNCTIONAL

    Re: Samsung vs Apple case moves to jury

    http://www.dailytech.com/article.aspx?newsid=29027
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  13. 24-10-2012, 07:46 PM #141
    watercooled
    watercooled is offline
    Senior Member watercooled's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    11,478
    Thanks
    1,541
    Thanked
    1,029 times in 872 posts

    Re: Samsung vs Apple case moves to jury

    Interesting, maybe they've read up on common sense?
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  14. 01-11-2012, 04:07 PM #142
    CAT-THE-FIFTH
    CAT-THE-FIFTH is offline
    Moosing about! CAT-THE-FIFTH's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Not here
    Posts
    32,042
    Thanks
    3,909
    Thanked
    5,213 times in 4,005 posts
    • CAT-THE-FIFTH's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Less E-PEEN
      • CPU:
      • Massive E-PEEN
      • Memory:
      • RGB E-PEEN
      • Storage:
      • Not in any order
      • Graphics card(s):
      • EVEN BIGGER E-PEEN
      • PSU:
      • OVERSIZED
      • Case:
      • UNDERSIZED
      • Operating System:
      • DOS 6.22
      • Monitor(s):
      • NOT USUALLY ON....WHEN I POST
      • Internet:
      • FUNCTIONAL

    Re: Samsung vs Apple case moves to jury

    http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-20165664
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote

  15. Received thanks from:

    watercooled (01-11-2012)
  16. 01-11-2012, 04:52 PM #143
    watercooled
    watercooled is offline
    Senior Member watercooled's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    11,478
    Thanks
    1,541
    Thanked
    1,029 times in 872 posts

    Re: Samsung vs Apple case moves to jury

    Well I didn't see that one coming.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  17. 16-11-2012, 08:07 PM #144
    CAT-THE-FIFTH
    CAT-THE-FIFTH is offline
    Moosing about! CAT-THE-FIFTH's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Not here
    Posts
    32,042
    Thanks
    3,909
    Thanked
    5,213 times in 4,005 posts
    • CAT-THE-FIFTH's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Less E-PEEN
      • CPU:
      • Massive E-PEEN
      • Memory:
      • RGB E-PEEN
      • Storage:
      • Not in any order
      • Graphics card(s):
      • EVEN BIGGER E-PEEN
      • PSU:
      • OVERSIZED
      • Case:
      • UNDERSIZED
      • Operating System:
      • DOS 6.22
      • Monitor(s):
      • NOT USUALLY ON....WHEN I POST
      • Internet:
      • FUNCTIONAL

    Re: Samsung vs Apple case moves to jury

    Oops:

    http://www.theverge.com/2012/11/10/3...-false-apology

    Also:

    http://blog.gsmarena.com/apple-pays-...face-in-ios-6/
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
Page 9 of 9 FirstFirst ... 6789
« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 2 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 2 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Forum Rules