Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst 1234
Results 49 to 54 of 54

Thread: Airlines to charge by Weight???

  1. #49
    Account closed at user request
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    Elephant watch camp
    Posts
    2,150
    Thanks
    56
    Thanked
    115 times in 103 posts
    • wasabi's system
      • Motherboard:
      • MSI B85M-G43
      • CPU:
      • i3-4130
      • Memory:
      • 8 gig DDR3 Crucial Rendition 1333 - cheap!
      • Storage:
      • 128 gig Agility 3, 240GB Corsair Force 3
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Zotac GTX 750Ti
      • PSU:
      • Silver Power SP-S460FL
      • Case:
      • Lian Li T60 testbanch
      • Operating System:
      • Win7 64bit
      • Monitor(s):
      • First F301GD Live
      • Internet:
      • Virgin cable 100 meg

    Re: Airlines to charge by Weight???

    Quote Originally Posted by melon View Post
    Emotive language is what you are resorting too by labeling my explanation because you have none yourself.

    To judge every wheelchair as fat because of necessary added weight they cant reduce
    No. You've simply set up a straw man. Then repeat your attack on it, even though it is meaningless as you are the one who made it in the first place.

  2. #50
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Posts
    6,587
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    246 times in 208 posts

    Re: Airlines to charge by Weight???

    It's not just the check-in luggage that is subject to weight restriction. Carry on are subject to weight limit too on most, if not all airlines. Though rarely, if ever enforced, it is there and one would have little room to argue if airliners decide to enforce it. So the perceived unfairness is there regardless of the airline's bottom line since the airline treats it as something relevant (to either charge for it, or provide as discretionary favour, or frequent mileage benefit). If loading luggage on board is such an expensive endeavour, yet the total weight relatively negligible, then at the very least make it so that one can hand carry any amount of weight (one can comfortably hand carry) within the size constraint. Not at discretion (the present norm), but by policy.

  3. #51
    Banned
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    points down
    Posts
    3,223
    Thanks
    467
    Thanked
    132 times in 111 posts

    Re: Airlines to charge by Weight???

    Quote Originally Posted by wasabi View Post
    No. You've simply set up a straw man. Then repeat your attack on it, even though it is meaningless as you are the one who made it in the first place.
    The only thing meaningless are these projections of yourself, I never setup anything other than presenting the evidence as fact , you on the other hand have done nothing but accused me of doing things to influence people while forgetting most people are free too choose ( including you ) whatever they want to believe themselves.

  4. #52
    Account closed at user request
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    Elephant watch camp
    Posts
    2,150
    Thanks
    56
    Thanked
    115 times in 103 posts
    • wasabi's system
      • Motherboard:
      • MSI B85M-G43
      • CPU:
      • i3-4130
      • Memory:
      • 8 gig DDR3 Crucial Rendition 1333 - cheap!
      • Storage:
      • 128 gig Agility 3, 240GB Corsair Force 3
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Zotac GTX 750Ti
      • PSU:
      • Silver Power SP-S460FL
      • Case:
      • Lian Li T60 testbanch
      • Operating System:
      • Win7 64bit
      • Monitor(s):
      • First F301GD Live
      • Internet:
      • Virgin cable 100 meg

    Re: Airlines to charge by Weight???

    Quote Originally Posted by melon View Post
    The only thing meaningless are these projections of yourself.
    And..... ignore list.

  5. #53
    Banned
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    points down
    Posts
    3,223
    Thanks
    467
    Thanked
    132 times in 111 posts

    Re: Airlines to charge by Weight???

    Quote Originally Posted by wasabi View Post
    And..... ignore list.
    Im touched .

    Cya

  6. #54
    Seething Cauldron of Hatred TheAnimus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    17,168
    Thanks
    803
    Thanked
    2,152 times in 1,408 posts

    Re: Airlines to charge by Weight???

    Quote Originally Posted by TooNice View Post
    It's not just the check-in luggage that is subject to weight restriction. Carry on are subject to weight limit too on most, if not all airlines. Though rarely, if ever enforced, it is there and one would have little room to argue if airliners decide to enforce it. So the perceived unfairness is there regardless of the airline's bottom line since the airline treats it as something relevant (to either charge for it, or provide as discretionary favour, or frequent mileage benefit). If loading luggage on board is such an expensive endeavour, yet the total weight relatively negligible, then at the very least make it so that one can hand carry any amount of weight (one can comfortably hand carry) within the size constraint. Not at discretion (the present norm), but by policy.
    Ah but the problem with carry on, is that after it's carried on, it has to be stowed, the overhead bins have piratical limits, these are very important because they can burst open, turbulence, defective lock etc.

    You have to make sure that the objects aren't so heavy they would create serious issues in an emergency (ie couldn't be moved by someone average) or so heavy they will damage the bin locking mechanism. Most airlines don't charge that much if you tell them upfront about the luggage, and how many people here have actually been fined for excess luggage?

    The thing is it doesn't matter so long as everyone is relatively close the norm, that is why most don't care about the odd 1 or 2kg.

    However if EVERYONE suddenly took on an extra 20kg, that could then matter a great deal, this is why they normally limit it. In the same way an airline can happily let 1 or 2% of a flight be disabled persons, without effecting the safety or their bottom line, they can let 10% fly with excess baggage without any real issue.

    This isn't too say all airlines are like this. I think that WizzAir in particular use the fines for terrible profit, they limit the hold bag weight just so you buy more hold bags (a nuclear family can't share just 2 or 3).

    But most of the airlines are really decent about it. It just exists to stop everyone doing it as this might make the plane be outside of limits. That is why excess baggage fees are in effect a kind of fine, to try and persuade you not to just turn up. One reason I often don't fly WizzAir or Easyjet or Ryainair is that when you add in the cost of some baggage, transit costs to the further away airport, they aren't cheaper.
    throw new ArgumentException (String, String, Exception)

Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst 1234

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •